确定迈向新兴创新的宽松因素(案例研究:政府组织)

Khalil Noruzi, Mohammad Hossein Shadmanfar
{"title":"确定迈向新兴创新的宽松因素(案例研究:政府组织)","authors":"Khalil Noruzi, Mohammad Hossein Shadmanfar","doi":"10.59615/ijie.3.2.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Purpose: The literature on novel and emerging innovations has typically focused on describing the hard and technological levels. The aim of the current research is to identify the effective factors in stagnation or uncontrollable delay in the movement of government research organizations in the direction of new and emerging innovations.
 Methodology: In terms of philosophy, interpretation and positivism, and in terms of the type of goal, in the category of applied research and research strategy, in the qualitative part, it has used thematic analysis with an inductive approach, and in the quantitative part, the method of partial least squares has been used. The data was collected in the qualitative part using in-depth semi-structured interviews with experts and in the quantitative part of the statistical population of employees of government research organizations, 269 samples were selected as statistical samples using Yamane's formula. In this research, a researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect data, and the technique of hierarchical component models using the partial least squares (PLS) method and SmartPLS4 software was used.
 Findings: Based on the analysis of the textual data of the interviews, after the integration of 148 primary identifiers, 35 basic themes, 7 organizing themes and 3 overarching themes were identified.
 Conclusion: Lack of supportive culture as the most important cause of lakhti Hanban, including cooperation and working group, fostering a culture of teamwork, sharing ideas and views, not valuing organizational culture, not encouraging the owners of innovative ideas and views, have formed structural indicators of the lack of supportive culture.","PeriodicalId":31435,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation in Mechanical Engineering and Advanced Materials","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying laxity factors in moving towards emerging innovations (Case study: government organizations)\",\"authors\":\"Khalil Noruzi, Mohammad Hossein Shadmanfar\",\"doi\":\"10.59615/ijie.3.2.39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background & Purpose: The literature on novel and emerging innovations has typically focused on describing the hard and technological levels. The aim of the current research is to identify the effective factors in stagnation or uncontrollable delay in the movement of government research organizations in the direction of new and emerging innovations.
 Methodology: In terms of philosophy, interpretation and positivism, and in terms of the type of goal, in the category of applied research and research strategy, in the qualitative part, it has used thematic analysis with an inductive approach, and in the quantitative part, the method of partial least squares has been used. The data was collected in the qualitative part using in-depth semi-structured interviews with experts and in the quantitative part of the statistical population of employees of government research organizations, 269 samples were selected as statistical samples using Yamane's formula. In this research, a researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect data, and the technique of hierarchical component models using the partial least squares (PLS) method and SmartPLS4 software was used.
 Findings: Based on the analysis of the textual data of the interviews, after the integration of 148 primary identifiers, 35 basic themes, 7 organizing themes and 3 overarching themes were identified.
 Conclusion: Lack of supportive culture as the most important cause of lakhti Hanban, including cooperation and working group, fostering a culture of teamwork, sharing ideas and views, not valuing organizational culture, not encouraging the owners of innovative ideas and views, have formed structural indicators of the lack of supportive culture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Innovation in Mechanical Engineering and Advanced Materials\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Innovation in Mechanical Engineering and Advanced Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59615/ijie.3.2.39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation in Mechanical Engineering and Advanced Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59615/ijie.3.2.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景,目的:关于新颖和新兴创新的文献通常侧重于描述硬件和技术层面。当前研究的目的是找出政府研究机构在新兴创新方向上的运动停滞或不可控延迟的有效因素。 方法论:在哲学、阐释和实证主义方面,在目标类型方面,在应用研究和研究策略的范畴上,在定性部分采用了归纳法的专题分析,在定量部分采用了偏最小二乘法。在定性部分采用专家深度半结构化访谈法收集数据,在定量部分采用政府研究机构雇员统计人群,采用Yamane公式选取269个样本作为统计样本。本研究采用自编问卷收集数据,采用偏最小二乘(PLS)方法和SmartPLS4软件构建分层成分模型技术。 结果:基于访谈文本数据分析,148个主要标识符整合后,共识别出35个基本主题、7个组织主题和3个总体主题。 结论:缺乏支持性文化是lakhti汉办最重要的原因,包括合作和工作组、培养团队文化、分享想法和观点、不重视组织文化、不鼓励创新想法和观点的所有者,这些都形成了缺乏支持性文化的结构性指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying laxity factors in moving towards emerging innovations (Case study: government organizations)
Background & Purpose: The literature on novel and emerging innovations has typically focused on describing the hard and technological levels. The aim of the current research is to identify the effective factors in stagnation or uncontrollable delay in the movement of government research organizations in the direction of new and emerging innovations. Methodology: In terms of philosophy, interpretation and positivism, and in terms of the type of goal, in the category of applied research and research strategy, in the qualitative part, it has used thematic analysis with an inductive approach, and in the quantitative part, the method of partial least squares has been used. The data was collected in the qualitative part using in-depth semi-structured interviews with experts and in the quantitative part of the statistical population of employees of government research organizations, 269 samples were selected as statistical samples using Yamane's formula. In this research, a researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect data, and the technique of hierarchical component models using the partial least squares (PLS) method and SmartPLS4 software was used. Findings: Based on the analysis of the textual data of the interviews, after the integration of 148 primary identifiers, 35 basic themes, 7 organizing themes and 3 overarching themes were identified. Conclusion: Lack of supportive culture as the most important cause of lakhti Hanban, including cooperation and working group, fostering a culture of teamwork, sharing ideas and views, not valuing organizational culture, not encouraging the owners of innovative ideas and views, have formed structural indicators of the lack of supportive culture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信