一些判别分析技术的性能

Q4 Decision Sciences
Michael O. Olusola, Sidney I. Onyeagu
{"title":"一些判别分析技术的性能","authors":"Michael O. Olusola, Sidney I. Onyeagu","doi":"10.1504/ijor.2023.132816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper re-appraises the use of the minimised sum of deviations by the proportion method (MSDP), the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) embodied in Minitab and the logit discriminant analysis (LoDA), for allocating observations into one of two mutually exclusive groups using some examples. In a recent paper, the MSDP was proposed as a means of generating a discriminant function that separates observations in a training sample (or development sample) of known group membership into specified groups. In the MSDP formulation, the sum of the proportion of exterior deviations is minimised subject to the group separation constraints, the normalisation constraint, the upper bound constraints on proportions of exterior deviations and the sign unrestriction vis-à-vis the non-negativity constraints. The decision rule on group-membership prediction is constructed using the apparent error rate. This study compares the performance of the MSDP with the LDA and LoDA based on their classification accuracy. The obtained results indicate that the LoDA is not suitable for the examples considered and that the MSDP is an appropriate alternative to the LDA.","PeriodicalId":35451,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Operational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of some discriminant analysis techniques\",\"authors\":\"Michael O. Olusola, Sidney I. Onyeagu\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/ijor.2023.132816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper re-appraises the use of the minimised sum of deviations by the proportion method (MSDP), the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) embodied in Minitab and the logit discriminant analysis (LoDA), for allocating observations into one of two mutually exclusive groups using some examples. In a recent paper, the MSDP was proposed as a means of generating a discriminant function that separates observations in a training sample (or development sample) of known group membership into specified groups. In the MSDP formulation, the sum of the proportion of exterior deviations is minimised subject to the group separation constraints, the normalisation constraint, the upper bound constraints on proportions of exterior deviations and the sign unrestriction vis-à-vis the non-negativity constraints. The decision rule on group-membership prediction is constructed using the apparent error rate. This study compares the performance of the MSDP with the LDA and LoDA based on their classification accuracy. The obtained results indicate that the LoDA is not suitable for the examples considered and that the MSDP is an appropriate alternative to the LDA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Operational Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Operational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijor.2023.132816\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Operational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijor.2023.132816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过一些例子,重新评价了比例法(MSDP)、Minitab中体现的线性判别分析(LDA)和logit判别分析(LoDA)对最小偏差和的使用,用于将观测值分配到两个互斥组之一。在最近的一篇论文中,MSDP被提出作为一种生成判别函数的手段,该判别函数将已知组成员的训练样本(或开发样本)中的观察结果分离到指定组中。在MSDP公式中,外部偏差比例的总和受到组分离约束、归一化约束、外部偏差比例的上界约束以及相对于-à-vis的非负性约束的符号不限制的约束而最小化。利用表观错误率构造了组成员预测的决策规则。本研究基于分类精度比较了MSDP与LDA和LoDA的性能。得到的结果表明,LDA不适合考虑的例子,MSDP是LDA的合适替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of some discriminant analysis techniques
This paper re-appraises the use of the minimised sum of deviations by the proportion method (MSDP), the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) embodied in Minitab and the logit discriminant analysis (LoDA), for allocating observations into one of two mutually exclusive groups using some examples. In a recent paper, the MSDP was proposed as a means of generating a discriminant function that separates observations in a training sample (or development sample) of known group membership into specified groups. In the MSDP formulation, the sum of the proportion of exterior deviations is minimised subject to the group separation constraints, the normalisation constraint, the upper bound constraints on proportions of exterior deviations and the sign unrestriction vis-à-vis the non-negativity constraints. The decision rule on group-membership prediction is constructed using the apparent error rate. This study compares the performance of the MSDP with the LDA and LoDA based on their classification accuracy. The obtained results indicate that the LoDA is not suitable for the examples considered and that the MSDP is an appropriate alternative to the LDA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Operational Research
International Journal of Operational Research Decision Sciences-Management Science and Operations Research
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: IJOR is a fully refereed journal generally covering new theory and application of operations research (OR) techniques and models that include inventory, queuing, transportation, game theory, scheduling, project management, mathematical programming, decision-support systems, multi-criteria decision making, artificial intelligence, neural network, fuzzy logic, expert systems, and simulation. New theories and applications of operations research models are welcome to IJOR. Modelling and optimisation have become an essential function of researchers and practitioners in a networked global economy. New theory development in operations research and their applications in new economy and society have been limited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信