国际法院判例中的赔偿:走向公平的途径

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW
Yang Liu
{"title":"国际法院判例中的赔偿:走向公平的途径","authors":"Yang Liu","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idad023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Article 36(2) of the International Law Commission’s Article on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (ARSIWA) provides that the responsible state shall compensate for all financially assessable damage. However, ARSIWA provides no guidance as to how such a broad rule should be applied in practice, which creates significant ambiguities for adjudicators in charge of adjudicating compensation claims in international law. In the past decade, the International Court of Justice has adjudicated three important compensation cases wherein it has exhibited a visible turn to equitable considerations in compensation determination. This article conducts an analysis of such an emerging equitable approach to compensation and argues that it is a welcome development, given the flexibility it provides to the Court for balancing different factors, with the aim of achieving an equitable determination of compensation. This article also addresses the justifications and predictability concerns of this approach.","PeriodicalId":44660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","volume":"279 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compensation in the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice: towards an equitable approach\",\"authors\":\"Yang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jnlids/idad023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Article 36(2) of the International Law Commission’s Article on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (ARSIWA) provides that the responsible state shall compensate for all financially assessable damage. However, ARSIWA provides no guidance as to how such a broad rule should be applied in practice, which creates significant ambiguities for adjudicators in charge of adjudicating compensation claims in international law. In the past decade, the International Court of Justice has adjudicated three important compensation cases wherein it has exhibited a visible turn to equitable considerations in compensation determination. This article conducts an analysis of such an emerging equitable approach to compensation and argues that it is a welcome development, given the flexibility it provides to the Court for balancing different factors, with the aim of achieving an equitable determination of compensation. This article also addresses the justifications and predictability concerns of this approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Dispute Settlement\",\"volume\":\"279 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Dispute Settlement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idad023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idad023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际法委员会《国家对国际不法行为的责任条款》(ARSIWA)第36条第2款规定,责任国应赔偿所有可在经济上评估的损害。但是,《国际仲裁和评估法》没有就如何在实践中应用这一广泛规则提供指导,这对负责裁决国际法赔偿要求的裁决人员造成了严重的含糊不清。在过去十年中,国际法院裁决了三个重要的赔偿案件,其中它在确定赔偿方面明显转向公平考虑。本文对这种正在出现的公平赔偿办法进行了分析,并认为这是一个值得欢迎的发展,因为它为法院提供了平衡不同因素的灵活性,目的是实现公平确定赔偿。本文还讨论了这种方法的合理性和可预测性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compensation in the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice: towards an equitable approach
Abstract Article 36(2) of the International Law Commission’s Article on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (ARSIWA) provides that the responsible state shall compensate for all financially assessable damage. However, ARSIWA provides no guidance as to how such a broad rule should be applied in practice, which creates significant ambiguities for adjudicators in charge of adjudicating compensation claims in international law. In the past decade, the International Court of Justice has adjudicated three important compensation cases wherein it has exhibited a visible turn to equitable considerations in compensation determination. This article conducts an analysis of such an emerging equitable approach to compensation and argues that it is a welcome development, given the flexibility it provides to the Court for balancing different factors, with the aim of achieving an equitable determination of compensation. This article also addresses the justifications and predictability concerns of this approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信