银行竞争和流动性囤积

IF 2.5 Q2 ECONOMICS
Japan Huynh
{"title":"银行竞争和流动性囤积","authors":"Japan Huynh","doi":"10.1007/s40822-023-00240-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the in-depth effect of bank competition on liquidity hoarding by using a comprehensive strategy for empirical measurement. More precisely, we include all asset-, liability-, and off-balance-sheet items when generating our measures of bank liquidity hoarding. For a multiple-aspect assessment of banking market structure, we simultaneously employ non-structural proxies (Lerner index, Boone indicator, and H-statistic index) and structural measures (top-bank market concentration ratio and Herfindahl–Hirschman index). Through bank-level financial data from 30 Vietnamese banks during 2007–2021, we find strong and consistent evidence that higher bank competition increases total liquidity hoarding. Disaggregate analysis reveals that the increased accumulation in total liquidity hoarding is driven by asset and liability items on the balance sheet, though our findings indicate that bank competition reduces liquidity hoarding off balance sheets. We further shed light on how the impact of competition on liquidity hoarding depends on bank-level heterogeneity. The results suggest that the link is less pronounced for banks that are larger in size, hold more equity capital, and yield better profitability. Our set of results consistently supports the view that financially healthier banks are more effective in handling competitive pressures in the banking market, and thus they may have a better position to mitigate the liquidity hoarding effect from bank competition. Multiple robustness checks are employed to lend further strength to our conclusions.","PeriodicalId":45064,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Economic Review","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bank competition and liquidity hoarding\",\"authors\":\"Japan Huynh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40822-023-00240-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores the in-depth effect of bank competition on liquidity hoarding by using a comprehensive strategy for empirical measurement. More precisely, we include all asset-, liability-, and off-balance-sheet items when generating our measures of bank liquidity hoarding. For a multiple-aspect assessment of banking market structure, we simultaneously employ non-structural proxies (Lerner index, Boone indicator, and H-statistic index) and structural measures (top-bank market concentration ratio and Herfindahl–Hirschman index). Through bank-level financial data from 30 Vietnamese banks during 2007–2021, we find strong and consistent evidence that higher bank competition increases total liquidity hoarding. Disaggregate analysis reveals that the increased accumulation in total liquidity hoarding is driven by asset and liability items on the balance sheet, though our findings indicate that bank competition reduces liquidity hoarding off balance sheets. We further shed light on how the impact of competition on liquidity hoarding depends on bank-level heterogeneity. The results suggest that the link is less pronounced for banks that are larger in size, hold more equity capital, and yield better profitability. Our set of results consistently supports the view that financially healthier banks are more effective in handling competitive pressures in the banking market, and thus they may have a better position to mitigate the liquidity hoarding effect from bank competition. Multiple robustness checks are employed to lend further strength to our conclusions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasian Economic Review\",\"volume\":\"135 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasian Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00240-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00240-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用综合的实证度量策略,深入探讨了银行竞争对流动性囤积的影响。更准确地说,我们在衡量银行流动性囤积时,包括了所有的资产、负债和表外项目。为了对银行市场结构进行多方面评估,我们同时采用了非结构性指标(Lerner指数、Boone指标和h统计指数)和结构性指标(顶级银行市场集中度和Herfindahl-Hirschman指数)。通过30家越南银行2007-2021年的银行级财务数据,我们发现了强有力且一致的证据,表明银行竞争加剧会增加流动性囤积总量。分类分析表明,总流动性囤积的增加是由资产负债表上的资产和负债项目驱动的,尽管我们的研究结果表明,银行竞争减少了资产负债表外的流动性囤积。我们进一步阐明了竞争对流动性囤积的影响如何取决于银行层面的异质性。结果表明,对于规模较大、持有更多权益资本、盈利能力较好的银行,这种联系不那么明显。我们的一组结果一致支持这样的观点,即财务状况较好的银行在应对银行市场的竞争压力方面更有效,因此它们可能更有能力缓解银行竞争带来的流动性囤积效应。采用了多个稳健性检查,以进一步加强我们的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bank competition and liquidity hoarding
This paper explores the in-depth effect of bank competition on liquidity hoarding by using a comprehensive strategy for empirical measurement. More precisely, we include all asset-, liability-, and off-balance-sheet items when generating our measures of bank liquidity hoarding. For a multiple-aspect assessment of banking market structure, we simultaneously employ non-structural proxies (Lerner index, Boone indicator, and H-statistic index) and structural measures (top-bank market concentration ratio and Herfindahl–Hirschman index). Through bank-level financial data from 30 Vietnamese banks during 2007–2021, we find strong and consistent evidence that higher bank competition increases total liquidity hoarding. Disaggregate analysis reveals that the increased accumulation in total liquidity hoarding is driven by asset and liability items on the balance sheet, though our findings indicate that bank competition reduces liquidity hoarding off balance sheets. We further shed light on how the impact of competition on liquidity hoarding depends on bank-level heterogeneity. The results suggest that the link is less pronounced for banks that are larger in size, hold more equity capital, and yield better profitability. Our set of results consistently supports the view that financially healthier banks are more effective in handling competitive pressures in the banking market, and thus they may have a better position to mitigate the liquidity hoarding effect from bank competition. Multiple robustness checks are employed to lend further strength to our conclusions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The mission of Eurasian Economic Review is to publish peer-reviewed empirical research papers that test, extend, or build theory and contribute to practice. All empirical methods - including, but not limited to, qualitative, quantitative, field, laboratory, and any combination of methods - are welcome. Empirical, theoretical and methodological articles from all fields of finance and applied macroeconomics are featured in the journal. Theoretical and/or review articles that integrate existing bodies of research and that provide new insights into the field are highly encouraged. The journal has a broad scope, addressing such issues as: financial systems and regulation, corporate and start-up finance, macro and sustainable finance, finance and innovation, consumer finance, public policies on financial markets within local, regional, national and international contexts, money and banking, and the interface of labor and financial economics. The macroeconomics coverage includes topics from monetary economics, labor economics, international economics and development economics. Eurasian Economic Review is published quarterly. To be published in Eurasian Economic Review, a manuscript must make strong empirical and/or theoretical contributions and highlight the significance of those contributions to our field. Consequently, preference is given to submissions that test, extend, or build strong theoretical frameworks while empirically examining issues with high importance for theory and practice. Eurasian Economic Review is not tied to any national context. Although it focuses on Europe and Asia, all papers from related fields on any region or country are highly encouraged. Single country studies, cross-country or regional studies can be submitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信