不对称地下地铁车站地震反应的振动台试验

IF 1.2 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Guobo Wang, Yao Wang, Jianning Wang, Zhengfang Dong
{"title":"不对称地下地铁车站地震反应的振动台试验","authors":"Guobo Wang, Yao Wang, Jianning Wang, Zhengfang Dong","doi":"10.1680/jphmg.22.00071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, many subway stations are designed symmetrically and less attention has been paid to asymmetrical stations. The middle column of the asymmetric underground structure is offset to one side, which is not conducive to load-bearing in strong earthquakes and is prone to damage. In this study, shaking table tests of a soil-symmetrical station and a soil-asymmetrical station were designed and conducted. A numerical model of soil-structure interaction system was established, and the feasibility of the simulation method was verified. Then, the seismic responses of two kinds of stations were discussed and analyzed. The results show that the dynamic response of both symmetrical and asymmetrical stations increases with the increase of loading seismic intensity. Influenced by the size effect of the model test, there is less difference between the two models in their dynamic response. From the perspective of internal force and relative deformation, the response of asymmetrical station is greater than that of symmetrical station, which adequately reflects the disadvantage of asymmetrical structure in seismic design.","PeriodicalId":48816,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shaking table test on seismic responses of asymmetrical underground subway stations\",\"authors\":\"Guobo Wang, Yao Wang, Jianning Wang, Zhengfang Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jphmg.22.00071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, many subway stations are designed symmetrically and less attention has been paid to asymmetrical stations. The middle column of the asymmetric underground structure is offset to one side, which is not conducive to load-bearing in strong earthquakes and is prone to damage. In this study, shaking table tests of a soil-symmetrical station and a soil-asymmetrical station were designed and conducted. A numerical model of soil-structure interaction system was established, and the feasibility of the simulation method was verified. Then, the seismic responses of two kinds of stations were discussed and analyzed. The results show that the dynamic response of both symmetrical and asymmetrical stations increases with the increase of loading seismic intensity. Influenced by the size effect of the model test, there is less difference between the two models in their dynamic response. From the perspective of internal force and relative deformation, the response of asymmetrical station is greater than that of symmetrical station, which adequately reflects the disadvantage of asymmetrical structure in seismic design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.22.00071\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.22.00071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,很多地铁站的设计都是对称的,不对称地铁站的设计很少受到重视。非对称地下结构中柱向一侧偏移,在强震时不利于承重,易发生破坏。本文设计并进行了对称土台站和非对称土台站的振动台试验。建立了土-结构相互作用系统的数值模型,验证了模拟方法的可行性。然后,对两种台站的地震反应进行了讨论和分析。结果表明,对称和不对称台站的动力响应均随荷载地震烈度的增加而增大。受模型试验尺寸效应的影响,两种模型的动力响应差异较小。从内力和相对变形的角度来看,非对称结构的响应大于对称结构,充分反映了非对称结构在抗震设计中的劣势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shaking table test on seismic responses of asymmetrical underground subway stations
Currently, many subway stations are designed symmetrically and less attention has been paid to asymmetrical stations. The middle column of the asymmetric underground structure is offset to one side, which is not conducive to load-bearing in strong earthquakes and is prone to damage. In this study, shaking table tests of a soil-symmetrical station and a soil-asymmetrical station were designed and conducted. A numerical model of soil-structure interaction system was established, and the feasibility of the simulation method was verified. Then, the seismic responses of two kinds of stations were discussed and analyzed. The results show that the dynamic response of both symmetrical and asymmetrical stations increases with the increase of loading seismic intensity. Influenced by the size effect of the model test, there is less difference between the two models in their dynamic response. From the perspective of internal force and relative deformation, the response of asymmetrical station is greater than that of symmetrical station, which adequately reflects the disadvantage of asymmetrical structure in seismic design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
15.80%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics contains the latest research and analysis in all areas of physical modelling at any scale, including modelling at single gravity and at multiple gravities on a centrifuge, shaking table and pressure chamber testing and geoenvironmental experiments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信