夫妻财产授予纠纷中家庭医疗保险与家庭医疗保险之比较:法官观点分析

Muhamad Subhi Apriantoro, M. Naufal Ibnu Alis, Sendy Septianozakia, Dadang Setiana
{"title":"夫妻财产授予纠纷中家庭医疗保险与家庭医疗保险之比较:法官观点分析","authors":"Muhamad Subhi Apriantoro, M. Naufal Ibnu Alis, Sendy Septianozakia, Dadang Setiana","doi":"10.29240/jhi.v8i1.6464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to assess how judges make decisions regarding disputes over grants on marital property from the perspectives of two legal systems, KHI and KHES. Specifically, the study examines a case (numbered 145/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Slk) that was heard at the Solok City, West Sumatera Religious Court and involved a communal property grant dispute. The research methodology used was normative juridical, a quantitative approach that uses secondary legal principles, and a qualitative system that relies on library research data. The study's findings indicate that comparing grant arrangements by Compilation of Islamic Law and Compilation of Sharia Economic Law, specifically in terms of the pillars mentioned in KHI and KHES, is closer to the consensus of scholars but not identical because KHI has additional witnesses and KHES has qabd.","PeriodicalId":33101,"journal":{"name":"AlIstinbath Jurnal Hukum Islam","volume":"298 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing KHI and KHES in Marital Property Grant Disputes: An Analysis of Judges' Views\",\"authors\":\"Muhamad Subhi Apriantoro, M. Naufal Ibnu Alis, Sendy Septianozakia, Dadang Setiana\",\"doi\":\"10.29240/jhi.v8i1.6464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to assess how judges make decisions regarding disputes over grants on marital property from the perspectives of two legal systems, KHI and KHES. Specifically, the study examines a case (numbered 145/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Slk) that was heard at the Solok City, West Sumatera Religious Court and involved a communal property grant dispute. The research methodology used was normative juridical, a quantitative approach that uses secondary legal principles, and a qualitative system that relies on library research data. The study's findings indicate that comparing grant arrangements by Compilation of Islamic Law and Compilation of Sharia Economic Law, specifically in terms of the pillars mentioned in KHI and KHES, is closer to the consensus of scholars but not identical because KHI has additional witnesses and KHES has qabd.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AlIstinbath Jurnal Hukum Islam\",\"volume\":\"298 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AlIstinbath Jurnal Hukum Islam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v8i1.6464\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlIstinbath Jurnal Hukum Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v8i1.6464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估法官如何从两种法律制度的角度对夫妻财产授予纠纷作出裁决。具体而言,该研究审查了在西苏门答腊索洛克市宗教法院审理的一起涉及公共财产授予纠纷的案件(编号145/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Slk)。所使用的研究方法是规范的司法,定量的方法,使用二级法律原则,和一个定性的系统,依赖于图书馆的研究数据。研究结果表明,比较《伊斯兰教法汇编》和《伊斯兰教法汇编》的资助安排,特别是在《伊斯兰教法汇编》和《伊斯兰教法汇编》中提到的支柱方面,更接近学者的共识,但并不相同,因为《伊斯兰教法汇编》有更多的证人,而《伊斯兰教法汇编》有qabd。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing KHI and KHES in Marital Property Grant Disputes: An Analysis of Judges' Views
This study aims to assess how judges make decisions regarding disputes over grants on marital property from the perspectives of two legal systems, KHI and KHES. Specifically, the study examines a case (numbered 145/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Slk) that was heard at the Solok City, West Sumatera Religious Court and involved a communal property grant dispute. The research methodology used was normative juridical, a quantitative approach that uses secondary legal principles, and a qualitative system that relies on library research data. The study's findings indicate that comparing grant arrangements by Compilation of Islamic Law and Compilation of Sharia Economic Law, specifically in terms of the pillars mentioned in KHI and KHES, is closer to the consensus of scholars but not identical because KHI has additional witnesses and KHES has qabd.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信