橄榄石-尖晶石铝交换温度计的扩展校准:在大火成岩省熔融条件和地幔岩性上的应用

IF 3.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Yishen Zhang, Olivier Namur, Weiran Li, Oliver Shorttle, Esteban Gazel, Eleanor Jennings, Peter Thy, Timothy L Grove, Bernard Charlier
{"title":"橄榄石-尖晶石铝交换温度计的扩展校准:在大火成岩省熔融条件和地幔岩性上的应用","authors":"Yishen Zhang, Olivier Namur, Weiran Li, Oliver Shorttle, Esteban Gazel, Eleanor Jennings, Peter Thy, Timothy L Grove, Bernard Charlier","doi":"10.1093/petrology/egad077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The application of the olivine–spinel aluminum exchange thermometer to natural samples is limited by the restricted experimental dataset on which it was calibrated. Here, we present a new dataset of 46 high-temperature crystallization experiments and 21 reanalyzed published experiments, which we used to extend the calibration to higher and lower temperatures. The final calibration dataset spans a range of conditions relevant to crustal and upper mantle processes: 1174–1606 °C, 0.1–1350 MPa, QFM−2.5 to QFM+7.2 (oxygen fugacity, fO2, reported in log units relative to the quartz–fayalite–magnetite buffer, QFM), and 0–7.4 wt.% H2Omelt. We propose three new models. The first is thermodynamically self-consistent, based on spinel Fe, Mg, Al, and Cr compositions and Al exchange between olivine and spinel. The second and third are empirical models that consider fewer elemental exchanges: the second uses only Al exchange and spinel compositions, whereas the third considers olivine–spinel Al and Cr exchange. All models include the modest effect of pressure on olivine-spinel equilibrium chemistry, whereas fO2 and water content have negligible effects. In general, as fewer elements are considered in the olivine–spinel exchange, the fit to experimental data worsens. Conversely, the associated decrease in model complexity improves their robustness against systematic errors when applied to natural crystal pairs: the thermodynamic model may underestimate crystallization temperatures in natural samples due to spinel subsolidus re-equilibration, whereas the empirical models (independent of Fe and Mg in spinel) are less sensitive to re-equilibration but yield temperatures with larger uncertainties. We applied a statistical test to select the most appropriate model for application to natural samples. When applied to lavas from mid-ocean ridges, Iceland, Skye, Emeishan, Etendeka, and Tortugal, our new temperature estimates are 30–100 °C lower than previously proposed. The lower temperature estimates cause a lower mantle melting temperature and significant impacts on the mantle lithology constraints.","PeriodicalId":16751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petrology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An extended calibration of the olivine–spinel aluminum exchange thermometer: Application to the melting conditions and mantle lithologies of large igneous provinces\",\"authors\":\"Yishen Zhang, Olivier Namur, Weiran Li, Oliver Shorttle, Esteban Gazel, Eleanor Jennings, Peter Thy, Timothy L Grove, Bernard Charlier\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/petrology/egad077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The application of the olivine–spinel aluminum exchange thermometer to natural samples is limited by the restricted experimental dataset on which it was calibrated. Here, we present a new dataset of 46 high-temperature crystallization experiments and 21 reanalyzed published experiments, which we used to extend the calibration to higher and lower temperatures. The final calibration dataset spans a range of conditions relevant to crustal and upper mantle processes: 1174–1606 °C, 0.1–1350 MPa, QFM−2.5 to QFM+7.2 (oxygen fugacity, fO2, reported in log units relative to the quartz–fayalite–magnetite buffer, QFM), and 0–7.4 wt.% H2Omelt. We propose three new models. The first is thermodynamically self-consistent, based on spinel Fe, Mg, Al, and Cr compositions and Al exchange between olivine and spinel. The second and third are empirical models that consider fewer elemental exchanges: the second uses only Al exchange and spinel compositions, whereas the third considers olivine–spinel Al and Cr exchange. All models include the modest effect of pressure on olivine-spinel equilibrium chemistry, whereas fO2 and water content have negligible effects. In general, as fewer elements are considered in the olivine–spinel exchange, the fit to experimental data worsens. Conversely, the associated decrease in model complexity improves their robustness against systematic errors when applied to natural crystal pairs: the thermodynamic model may underestimate crystallization temperatures in natural samples due to spinel subsolidus re-equilibration, whereas the empirical models (independent of Fe and Mg in spinel) are less sensitive to re-equilibration but yield temperatures with larger uncertainties. We applied a statistical test to select the most appropriate model for application to natural samples. When applied to lavas from mid-ocean ridges, Iceland, Skye, Emeishan, Etendeka, and Tortugal, our new temperature estimates are 30–100 °C lower than previously proposed. The lower temperature estimates cause a lower mantle melting temperature and significant impacts on the mantle lithology constraints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Petrology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Petrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egad077\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egad077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

橄榄石-尖晶石铝交换温度计在天然样品中的应用受到校准实验数据的限制。在这里,我们提供了一个新的数据集,包括46个高温结晶实验和21个重新分析的已发表实验,我们使用它来扩展校准到更高和更低的温度。最终校准数据集涵盖了与地壳和上地幔过程相关的一系列条件:1174-1606°C, 0.1-1350 MPa, QFM - 2.5至QFM+7.2(氧逸度,fO2,相对于石英-费长石-磁铁矿缓冲带,QFM), 0-7.4 wt.% H2Omelt。我们提出了三种新模式。第一种是热力学自一致的,基于尖晶石铁、镁、铝和铬的组成以及橄榄石和尖晶石之间的铝交换。第二种和第三种是经验模型,考虑较少的元素交换:第二种只使用Al交换和尖晶石成分,而第三种考虑橄榄石-尖晶石Al和Cr交换。所有模型都包括压力对橄榄石-尖晶石平衡化学的适度影响,而fO2和水含量的影响可以忽略不计。一般来说,由于在橄榄石-尖晶石交换中考虑的元素较少,与实验数据的拟合就会变差。相反,当应用于天然晶体对时,模型复杂性的降低提高了它们对系统误差的鲁棒性:由于尖晶石亚固态再平衡,热力学模型可能低估了天然样品中的结晶温度,而经验模型(独立于尖晶石中的铁和镁)对再平衡不太敏感,但产生的温度具有更大的不确定性。我们应用统计检验来选择最适合应用于自然样本的模型。当应用于大洋中脊、冰岛、斯凯、峨眉山、Etendeka和Tortugal的熔岩时,我们的新温度估计比以前提出的低30-100°C。较低的温度估计导致较低的地幔熔融温度,并对地幔岩性约束产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An extended calibration of the olivine–spinel aluminum exchange thermometer: Application to the melting conditions and mantle lithologies of large igneous provinces
Abstract The application of the olivine–spinel aluminum exchange thermometer to natural samples is limited by the restricted experimental dataset on which it was calibrated. Here, we present a new dataset of 46 high-temperature crystallization experiments and 21 reanalyzed published experiments, which we used to extend the calibration to higher and lower temperatures. The final calibration dataset spans a range of conditions relevant to crustal and upper mantle processes: 1174–1606 °C, 0.1–1350 MPa, QFM−2.5 to QFM+7.2 (oxygen fugacity, fO2, reported in log units relative to the quartz–fayalite–magnetite buffer, QFM), and 0–7.4 wt.% H2Omelt. We propose three new models. The first is thermodynamically self-consistent, based on spinel Fe, Mg, Al, and Cr compositions and Al exchange between olivine and spinel. The second and third are empirical models that consider fewer elemental exchanges: the second uses only Al exchange and spinel compositions, whereas the third considers olivine–spinel Al and Cr exchange. All models include the modest effect of pressure on olivine-spinel equilibrium chemistry, whereas fO2 and water content have negligible effects. In general, as fewer elements are considered in the olivine–spinel exchange, the fit to experimental data worsens. Conversely, the associated decrease in model complexity improves their robustness against systematic errors when applied to natural crystal pairs: the thermodynamic model may underestimate crystallization temperatures in natural samples due to spinel subsolidus re-equilibration, whereas the empirical models (independent of Fe and Mg in spinel) are less sensitive to re-equilibration but yield temperatures with larger uncertainties. We applied a statistical test to select the most appropriate model for application to natural samples. When applied to lavas from mid-ocean ridges, Iceland, Skye, Emeishan, Etendeka, and Tortugal, our new temperature estimates are 30–100 °C lower than previously proposed. The lower temperature estimates cause a lower mantle melting temperature and significant impacts on the mantle lithology constraints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Petrology
Journal of Petrology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Petrology provides an international forum for the publication of high quality research in the broad field of igneous and metamorphic petrology and petrogenesis. Papers published cover a vast range of topics in areas such as major element, trace element and isotope geochemistry and geochronology applied to petrogenesis; experimental petrology; processes of magma generation, differentiation and emplacement; quantitative studies of rock-forming minerals and their paragenesis; regional studies of igneous and meta morphic rocks which contribute to the solution of fundamental petrological problems; theoretical modelling of petrogenetic processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信