加重偏心载荷对杠铃和单杠反动作跳跃的影响

Christopher Taber, Calin Butler, Victoria Dabek, Benjamin Kochan, Kyle McCormick, Emily Petro, Timothy Suchomel, Justin Merrigan
{"title":"加重偏心载荷对杠铃和单杠反动作跳跃的影响","authors":"Christopher Taber, Calin Butler, Victoria Dabek, Benjamin Kochan, Kyle McCormick, Emily Petro, Timothy Suchomel, Justin Merrigan","doi":"10.47206/ijsc.v3i1.213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined effects of accentuated eccentric loading (AEL) on barbell and trap bar loaded countermovement jumps (LCMJ). Twenty-one subjects (16 male, 5 female; Age: 23.5 ± 1.8 years; Body mass: 81.4 ± 10.6 kg; Height: 176.9 ± 7.2 cm; Training age: 7.1 ± 2.6 years) participated in this study. Upon establishing one repetition maximum and baseline jumping conditions, three experimental loading sessions were completed in random order. Barbell and trap bar LCMJ were performed with a spectrum of fixed loads from 20-50 kg during control conditions and with additional AEL loads of 10, 20, or 30 kg for experimental conditions. According to coefficients of variation (<10%), jump height, modified reactive strength index (mRSI), force, impulse, and duration measures were considered reliable across conditions. Mixed effect models analyzed effects of AEL against fixed loading in trap bar and barbell LCMJ (p < 0.05). Compared to the control condition, AEL produced negligible reductions in jump height during barbell LCMJ and small reductions during trap bar LCMJ. Modified reactive strength indexes were reduced by AEL during barbell LCMJ but not trap bar LCMJ. Average braking forces were greater in AEL conditions, while propulsive impulse was lower in the AEL conditions. The barbell LCMJ with AEL resulted in longer propulsive durations and unchanged braking durations, while propulsive and braking durations were lower during trap bar LCMJ with AEL compared to control conditions. This investigation revealed that use of AEL increases eccentric braking forces but decreases propulsive phase outputs, which subsequently may result in negligible to small acute decreases in LCMJ height. Implementing AEL during LCMJ may be an effective strategy to improve deceleration / eccentric abilities. Future research should explore longitudinal power and deceleration adaptations, while concomitantly improving acutely altered movement mechanics from AEL.","PeriodicalId":170948,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Strength and Conditioning","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Accentuated Eccentric Loading on Barbell and Trap Bar Countermovement Jumps\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Taber, Calin Butler, Victoria Dabek, Benjamin Kochan, Kyle McCormick, Emily Petro, Timothy Suchomel, Justin Merrigan\",\"doi\":\"10.47206/ijsc.v3i1.213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examined effects of accentuated eccentric loading (AEL) on barbell and trap bar loaded countermovement jumps (LCMJ). Twenty-one subjects (16 male, 5 female; Age: 23.5 ± 1.8 years; Body mass: 81.4 ± 10.6 kg; Height: 176.9 ± 7.2 cm; Training age: 7.1 ± 2.6 years) participated in this study. Upon establishing one repetition maximum and baseline jumping conditions, three experimental loading sessions were completed in random order. Barbell and trap bar LCMJ were performed with a spectrum of fixed loads from 20-50 kg during control conditions and with additional AEL loads of 10, 20, or 30 kg for experimental conditions. According to coefficients of variation (<10%), jump height, modified reactive strength index (mRSI), force, impulse, and duration measures were considered reliable across conditions. Mixed effect models analyzed effects of AEL against fixed loading in trap bar and barbell LCMJ (p < 0.05). Compared to the control condition, AEL produced negligible reductions in jump height during barbell LCMJ and small reductions during trap bar LCMJ. Modified reactive strength indexes were reduced by AEL during barbell LCMJ but not trap bar LCMJ. Average braking forces were greater in AEL conditions, while propulsive impulse was lower in the AEL conditions. The barbell LCMJ with AEL resulted in longer propulsive durations and unchanged braking durations, while propulsive and braking durations were lower during trap bar LCMJ with AEL compared to control conditions. This investigation revealed that use of AEL increases eccentric braking forces but decreases propulsive phase outputs, which subsequently may result in negligible to small acute decreases in LCMJ height. Implementing AEL during LCMJ may be an effective strategy to improve deceleration / eccentric abilities. Future research should explore longitudinal power and deceleration adaptations, while concomitantly improving acutely altered movement mechanics from AEL.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Strength and Conditioning\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Strength and Conditioning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v3i1.213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Strength and Conditioning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v3i1.213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了加重偏心载荷(AEL)对杠铃和陷杆载荷反向运动跳跃(LCMJ)的影响。21例受试者(男16例,女5例;年龄:23.5±1.8岁;体重:81.4±10.6 kg;高度:176.9±7.2 cm;训练年龄:7.1±2.6岁)参加本研究。在确定一次最大重复和基线跳跃条件后,按随机顺序完成3次实验加载。在控制条件下,杠铃和夹杆LCMJ在20-50 kg的固定负荷范围内进行,在实验条件下,额外的AEL负荷为10、20或30 kg。根据变异系数(<10%),跳跃高度、修正反应强度指数(mRSI)、力、冲量和持续时间测量被认为是可靠的。混合效应模型分析了AEL对陷阱杆和杠铃固定载荷的影响[p <];0.05)。与对照条件相比,AEL在杠铃LCMJ期间对跳跃高度的降低可以忽略不计,在陷阱杆LCMJ期间对跳跃高度的降低很小。在杠铃LCMJ过程中,AEL降低了改良反应强度指标,但对陷阱杆LCMJ没有影响。平均制动力在AEL条件下较大,而推进冲量在AEL条件下较低。杠铃LCMJ与AEL导致了更长的推进持续时间和不变的制动持续时间,而在陷阱杆LCMJ与AEL相比,推进和制动持续时间较低。这项研究表明,AEL的使用增加了偏心制动力,但减少了推进相输出,这随后可能导致LCMJ高度的可忽略不计到小的急性下降。在LCMJ期间实施AEL可能是提高减速/偏心能力的有效策略。未来的研究应该探索纵向力量和减速适应,同时改善AEL引起的剧烈改变的运动力学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effects of Accentuated Eccentric Loading on Barbell and Trap Bar Countermovement Jumps
This study examined effects of accentuated eccentric loading (AEL) on barbell and trap bar loaded countermovement jumps (LCMJ). Twenty-one subjects (16 male, 5 female; Age: 23.5 ± 1.8 years; Body mass: 81.4 ± 10.6 kg; Height: 176.9 ± 7.2 cm; Training age: 7.1 ± 2.6 years) participated in this study. Upon establishing one repetition maximum and baseline jumping conditions, three experimental loading sessions were completed in random order. Barbell and trap bar LCMJ were performed with a spectrum of fixed loads from 20-50 kg during control conditions and with additional AEL loads of 10, 20, or 30 kg for experimental conditions. According to coefficients of variation (<10%), jump height, modified reactive strength index (mRSI), force, impulse, and duration measures were considered reliable across conditions. Mixed effect models analyzed effects of AEL against fixed loading in trap bar and barbell LCMJ (p < 0.05). Compared to the control condition, AEL produced negligible reductions in jump height during barbell LCMJ and small reductions during trap bar LCMJ. Modified reactive strength indexes were reduced by AEL during barbell LCMJ but not trap bar LCMJ. Average braking forces were greater in AEL conditions, while propulsive impulse was lower in the AEL conditions. The barbell LCMJ with AEL resulted in longer propulsive durations and unchanged braking durations, while propulsive and braking durations were lower during trap bar LCMJ with AEL compared to control conditions. This investigation revealed that use of AEL increases eccentric braking forces but decreases propulsive phase outputs, which subsequently may result in negligible to small acute decreases in LCMJ height. Implementing AEL during LCMJ may be an effective strategy to improve deceleration / eccentric abilities. Future research should explore longitudinal power and deceleration adaptations, while concomitantly improving acutely altered movement mechanics from AEL.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信