{"title":"用三种方法计算圆柱矢量光束尖锐焦点处的强度","authors":"A.G. Nalimov, V.V. Kotlyar, Yu.V. Khanenko","doi":"10.18287/2412-6179-co-1346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We conduct a comparative analysis of diffraction fields upon sharply focusing vortex and non-vortex incident beams, calculated using three non-paraxial methods. The methods employed are a finite difference time domain (FDTD) method, a Rayleigh–Sommerfeld integral, and a Richards–Wolf transformation. The Richards–Wolf transformation is used with two apodization functions of the exit pupil, for a spherical lens and a thin diffractive lens. The numerical simulation shows that the Rayleigh–Sommerfeld integral and the Richards–Wolf transformation can produce almost the same result and save time significantly. Meanwhile, the root-mean-square deviation of the results of both methods from the FDTD method can be as low as 2%. If an ultra-short focal length is used, the Richards–Wolf transformation is found to be more accurate, whereas with increasing distance from the initial plane and outside the focal plane, the Rayleigh-Sommerfeld integral is more accurate.","PeriodicalId":46692,"journal":{"name":"Computer Optics","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calculation of the intensity at the sharp focus of a cylindrical vector beam by three methods\",\"authors\":\"A.G. Nalimov, V.V. Kotlyar, Yu.V. Khanenko\",\"doi\":\"10.18287/2412-6179-co-1346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We conduct a comparative analysis of diffraction fields upon sharply focusing vortex and non-vortex incident beams, calculated using three non-paraxial methods. The methods employed are a finite difference time domain (FDTD) method, a Rayleigh–Sommerfeld integral, and a Richards–Wolf transformation. The Richards–Wolf transformation is used with two apodization functions of the exit pupil, for a spherical lens and a thin diffractive lens. The numerical simulation shows that the Rayleigh–Sommerfeld integral and the Richards–Wolf transformation can produce almost the same result and save time significantly. Meanwhile, the root-mean-square deviation of the results of both methods from the FDTD method can be as low as 2%. If an ultra-short focal length is used, the Richards–Wolf transformation is found to be more accurate, whereas with increasing distance from the initial plane and outside the focal plane, the Rayleigh-Sommerfeld integral is more accurate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Optics\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Optics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18287/2412-6179-co-1346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Optics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18287/2412-6179-co-1346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Calculation of the intensity at the sharp focus of a cylindrical vector beam by three methods
We conduct a comparative analysis of diffraction fields upon sharply focusing vortex and non-vortex incident beams, calculated using three non-paraxial methods. The methods employed are a finite difference time domain (FDTD) method, a Rayleigh–Sommerfeld integral, and a Richards–Wolf transformation. The Richards–Wolf transformation is used with two apodization functions of the exit pupil, for a spherical lens and a thin diffractive lens. The numerical simulation shows that the Rayleigh–Sommerfeld integral and the Richards–Wolf transformation can produce almost the same result and save time significantly. Meanwhile, the root-mean-square deviation of the results of both methods from the FDTD method can be as low as 2%. If an ultra-short focal length is used, the Richards–Wolf transformation is found to be more accurate, whereas with increasing distance from the initial plane and outside the focal plane, the Rayleigh-Sommerfeld integral is more accurate.
期刊介绍:
The journal is intended for researchers and specialists active in the following research areas: Diffractive Optics; Information Optical Technology; Nanophotonics and Optics of Nanostructures; Image Analysis & Understanding; Information Coding & Security; Earth Remote Sensing Technologies; Hyperspectral Data Analysis; Numerical Methods for Optics and Image Processing; Intelligent Video Analysis. The journal "Computer Optics" has been published since 1987. Published 6 issues per year.