全瘫性脊髓损伤患者中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停的患病率:研究和临床数据的回顾性分析

M Graco, W Ruehland, R Schembri, T Churchward, K Saravanan, N Sheers, D Berlowitz
{"title":"全瘫性脊髓损伤患者中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停的患病率:研究和临床数据的回顾性分析","authors":"M Graco, W Ruehland, R Schembri, T Churchward, K Saravanan, N Sheers, D Berlowitz","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Study Objectives Over 80% of people with tetraplegia have sleep disordered breathing, but whether this is predominantly obstructive or central is unclear. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of central sleep apnoea (CSA) in tetraplegia and the contributions of central, obstructive and hypopnoea respiratory events to sleep disordered breathing summary indices in tetraplegia. Methods Research and clinical data from 606 individuals with tetraplegia and full overnight polysomnography were collated. The proportions of different respiratory event types were calculated; overall and for mild, moderate, and severe disease. The prevalence of Predominant CSA (central apnoea index 5 and more central than obstructive apnoeas) and Any CSA (central apnoea index  5) was estimated. Prevalence of sleep-related hypoventilation was estimated in a clinical sub-cohort. Results Respiratory events were primarily hypopnoeas (71%), followed by obstructive (23%), central (4%) and mixed apnoeas (2%). As severity increased, the relative contribution of hypopnoeas and central apnoeas decreased, while that of obstructive apnoeas increased. The prevalence of Predominant CSA and Any CSA were 4.3% (26/606) and 8.4% (51/606) respectively. Being male, on opiates and having a high tetraplegic spinal cord injury were associated with CSA. Sleep-related hypoventilation was identified in 26% (26/113) of the clinical sub-cohort. Conclusions This is the largest study to characterize sleep disordered breathing in tetraplegia. It provides strong evidence that obstructive sleep apnoea is the predominant sleep disordered breathing type; 9-18 times more prevalent than CSA. The prevalence of CSA was estimated to be 4-8%, significantly lower than previously reported.","PeriodicalId":21861,"journal":{"name":"SLEEP Advances","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O070 Prevalence of central sleep apnoea in people with tetraplegic spinal cord injury: a retrospective analysis of research and clinical data\",\"authors\":\"M Graco, W Ruehland, R Schembri, T Churchward, K Saravanan, N Sheers, D Berlowitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Study Objectives Over 80% of people with tetraplegia have sleep disordered breathing, but whether this is predominantly obstructive or central is unclear. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of central sleep apnoea (CSA) in tetraplegia and the contributions of central, obstructive and hypopnoea respiratory events to sleep disordered breathing summary indices in tetraplegia. Methods Research and clinical data from 606 individuals with tetraplegia and full overnight polysomnography were collated. The proportions of different respiratory event types were calculated; overall and for mild, moderate, and severe disease. The prevalence of Predominant CSA (central apnoea index 5 and more central than obstructive apnoeas) and Any CSA (central apnoea index  5) was estimated. Prevalence of sleep-related hypoventilation was estimated in a clinical sub-cohort. Results Respiratory events were primarily hypopnoeas (71%), followed by obstructive (23%), central (4%) and mixed apnoeas (2%). As severity increased, the relative contribution of hypopnoeas and central apnoeas decreased, while that of obstructive apnoeas increased. The prevalence of Predominant CSA and Any CSA were 4.3% (26/606) and 8.4% (51/606) respectively. Being male, on opiates and having a high tetraplegic spinal cord injury were associated with CSA. Sleep-related hypoventilation was identified in 26% (26/113) of the clinical sub-cohort. Conclusions This is the largest study to characterize sleep disordered breathing in tetraplegia. It provides strong evidence that obstructive sleep apnoea is the predominant sleep disordered breathing type; 9-18 times more prevalent than CSA. The prevalence of CSA was estimated to be 4-8%, significantly lower than previously reported.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SLEEP Advances\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SLEEP Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLEEP Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

超过80%的四肢瘫痪患者有睡眠呼吸障碍,但这主要是阻塞性还是中枢性尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停(CSA)在四肢瘫痪患者中的患病率,以及中枢性、阻塞性和低通气呼吸事件对四肢瘫痪患者睡眠呼吸障碍总结指数的贡献。方法对606例四肢瘫痪患者的研究和临床资料进行整理。计算不同呼吸事件类型的比例;总的来说,适用于轻度、中度和重度疾病。主要CSA(中枢呼吸暂停指数大于阻塞性呼吸暂停)和任何CSA(中枢呼吸暂停指数)的患病率。在临床亚队列中估计睡眠相关低通气的患病率。结果呼吸事件以低呼吸为主(71%),其次为阻塞性(23%)、中枢性(4%)和混合性呼吸(2%)。随着严重程度的增加,低通气和中枢性呼吸暂停的相对贡献减少,而阻塞性呼吸暂停的相对贡献增加。显性CSA和任意CSA的患病率分别为4.3%(26/606)和8.4%(51/606)。服用阿片类药物的男性和高度四肢瘫痪的脊髓损伤与CSA相关。26%(26/113)的临床亚队列患者发现与睡眠相关的低通气。这是描述四肢瘫痪患者睡眠呼吸障碍的最大研究。它提供了强有力的证据,阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停是主要的睡眠呼吸障碍类型;发病率是CSA的9-18倍。CSA的患病率估计为4-8%,明显低于之前的报道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
O070 Prevalence of central sleep apnoea in people with tetraplegic spinal cord injury: a retrospective analysis of research and clinical data
Abstract Study Objectives Over 80% of people with tetraplegia have sleep disordered breathing, but whether this is predominantly obstructive or central is unclear. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of central sleep apnoea (CSA) in tetraplegia and the contributions of central, obstructive and hypopnoea respiratory events to sleep disordered breathing summary indices in tetraplegia. Methods Research and clinical data from 606 individuals with tetraplegia and full overnight polysomnography were collated. The proportions of different respiratory event types were calculated; overall and for mild, moderate, and severe disease. The prevalence of Predominant CSA (central apnoea index 5 and more central than obstructive apnoeas) and Any CSA (central apnoea index  5) was estimated. Prevalence of sleep-related hypoventilation was estimated in a clinical sub-cohort. Results Respiratory events were primarily hypopnoeas (71%), followed by obstructive (23%), central (4%) and mixed apnoeas (2%). As severity increased, the relative contribution of hypopnoeas and central apnoeas decreased, while that of obstructive apnoeas increased. The prevalence of Predominant CSA and Any CSA were 4.3% (26/606) and 8.4% (51/606) respectively. Being male, on opiates and having a high tetraplegic spinal cord injury were associated with CSA. Sleep-related hypoventilation was identified in 26% (26/113) of the clinical sub-cohort. Conclusions This is the largest study to characterize sleep disordered breathing in tetraplegia. It provides strong evidence that obstructive sleep apnoea is the predominant sleep disordered breathing type; 9-18 times more prevalent than CSA. The prevalence of CSA was estimated to be 4-8%, significantly lower than previously reported.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信