现在一起:建立一个共享访问司法研究框架的理论见解和可操作的情报

IF 0.5 Q3 LAW
Rebecca Sandefur, Matthew Burnett
{"title":"现在一起:建立一个共享访问司法研究框架的理论见解和可操作的情报","authors":"Rebecca Sandefur, Matthew Burnett","doi":"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As empirical research into access to justice burgeons around the world, contemporary work offers opportunities for integration and synthesis, generating insights that can inform both policy priorities and practical decisions about program design and implementation. Access to justice is historically a problem-focused research field, but an important strand of contemporary access to justice research focuses on solutions, or a deeper understanding “what works.” This paper offers a three-part framework for thinking about how research about “what works” in one jurisdiction can inform understanding of what might work in others. We propose a common core of research questions; a framework for conceptualizing the objects of study (in the example here, programs); and a framework for conceptualizing the contexts in which those programs might operate.","PeriodicalId":36457,"journal":{"name":"Onati Socio-Legal Series","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"All together now: Building a shared access to justice research framework for theoretical insight and actionable intelligence\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Sandefur, Matthew Burnett\",\"doi\":\"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As empirical research into access to justice burgeons around the world, contemporary work offers opportunities for integration and synthesis, generating insights that can inform both policy priorities and practical decisions about program design and implementation. Access to justice is historically a problem-focused research field, but an important strand of contemporary access to justice research focuses on solutions, or a deeper understanding “what works.” This paper offers a three-part framework for thinking about how research about “what works” in one jurisdiction can inform understanding of what might work in others. We propose a common core of research questions; a framework for conceptualizing the objects of study (in the example here, programs); and a framework for conceptualizing the contexts in which those programs might operate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Onati Socio-Legal Series\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Onati Socio-Legal Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onati Socio-Legal Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着对司法公正的实证研究在世界各地迅速发展,当代工作为整合和综合提供了机会,从而产生见解,可以为有关方案设计和实施的政策重点和实际决策提供信息。从历史上看,诉诸司法是一个以问题为重点的研究领域,但当代诉诸司法研究的一个重要组成部分侧重于解决方案,或更深入地理解“什么有效”。本文提供了一个由三部分组成的框架,用于思考如何研究在一个司法管辖区“有效”的方法,从而了解在其他司法管辖区可能有效的方法。我们提出了一个共同的核心研究问题;概念化研究对象的框架(在这里的例子中是程序);以及一个将这些程序可能运行的环境概念化的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
All together now: Building a shared access to justice research framework for theoretical insight and actionable intelligence
As empirical research into access to justice burgeons around the world, contemporary work offers opportunities for integration and synthesis, generating insights that can inform both policy priorities and practical decisions about program design and implementation. Access to justice is historically a problem-focused research field, but an important strand of contemporary access to justice research focuses on solutions, or a deeper understanding “what works.” This paper offers a three-part framework for thinking about how research about “what works” in one jurisdiction can inform understanding of what might work in others. We propose a common core of research questions; a framework for conceptualizing the objects of study (in the example here, programs); and a framework for conceptualizing the contexts in which those programs might operate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Onati Socio-Legal Series
Onati Socio-Legal Series Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信