利多卡因40 mg与芬太尼100 ug预处理预防异丙酚静脉注射相关疼痛的比较

Syed Adnan Alam, Rashid Ullah Khan, Muhammad Bilal, Khurram Liaqat, Afia Rahna, Javed Iqbal
{"title":"利多卡因40 mg与芬太尼100 ug预处理预防异丙酚静脉注射相关疼痛的比较","authors":"Syed Adnan Alam, Rashid Ullah Khan, Muhammad Bilal, Khurram Liaqat, Afia Rahna, Javed Iqbal","doi":"10.35787/jimdc.v12i3.1048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract&#x0D; Background: Propofol (2,6-di-isopropylphenol) is one of the most favored drugs used for induction of anesthesia. Pain on injection is a common problem. Various methods have been tried to alleviate this pain but with conflicting results.&#x0D; Objective: To compare effectiveness of lignocaine versus fentanyl in patients receiving propofol for general anesthesia in population of Pakistan who come to PIMS hospital in Islamabad.&#x0D; Materials and Methods: 120 participants of either sex, between 18 and 40 years of age, belonging to ASA physical status I and II, undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, were randomized into two equal groups of 60 participants. They received, intravenously, either lignocaine 2 ml (20 mg/ml )or fentanyl 2 ml (50 mcg/mL) as a pretreatment before propofol injection.&#x0D; Results: The efficacy of lignocaine as a pretreatment drug injection was higher (96.7%) compared to fentanyl (85.0%). In the lignocaine group, 2.3% of the participants experienced pain as compared with 15% in the fentanyl group (P<0.05).&#x0D; Conclusion: Compared with fentanyl, lignocaine pretreatment was more effective in preventing pain on propofol injection.&#x0D; KEY WORDS: Comparison, Fentanyl, LIgnocaine, Propofol, Pain.","PeriodicalId":33701,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamabad Medical and Dental College","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Pretreatment with Lignocaine 40 mg and Fentanyl 100 ug as an Adjuvant for Preclusion of Pain Associated with Intravenous Propofol Injection\",\"authors\":\"Syed Adnan Alam, Rashid Ullah Khan, Muhammad Bilal, Khurram Liaqat, Afia Rahna, Javed Iqbal\",\"doi\":\"10.35787/jimdc.v12i3.1048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract&#x0D; Background: Propofol (2,6-di-isopropylphenol) is one of the most favored drugs used for induction of anesthesia. Pain on injection is a common problem. Various methods have been tried to alleviate this pain but with conflicting results.&#x0D; Objective: To compare effectiveness of lignocaine versus fentanyl in patients receiving propofol for general anesthesia in population of Pakistan who come to PIMS hospital in Islamabad.&#x0D; Materials and Methods: 120 participants of either sex, between 18 and 40 years of age, belonging to ASA physical status I and II, undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, were randomized into two equal groups of 60 participants. They received, intravenously, either lignocaine 2 ml (20 mg/ml )or fentanyl 2 ml (50 mcg/mL) as a pretreatment before propofol injection.&#x0D; Results: The efficacy of lignocaine as a pretreatment drug injection was higher (96.7%) compared to fentanyl (85.0%). In the lignocaine group, 2.3% of the participants experienced pain as compared with 15% in the fentanyl group (P<0.05).&#x0D; Conclusion: Compared with fentanyl, lignocaine pretreatment was more effective in preventing pain on propofol injection.&#x0D; KEY WORDS: Comparison, Fentanyl, LIgnocaine, Propofol, Pain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Islamabad Medical and Dental College\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Islamabad Medical and Dental College\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35787/jimdc.v12i3.1048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamabad Medical and Dental College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35787/jimdc.v12i3.1048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要# x0D;背景:异丙酚(2,6-二异丙酚)是最常用的麻醉诱导药物之一。注射时疼痛是一个常见的问题。人们尝试了各种方法来减轻这种痛苦,但结果却相互矛盾。 目的:比较利多卡因与芬太尼在巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡PIMS医院接受异丙酚全身麻醉患者中的疗效。材料与方法:在全麻下行择期手术,年龄在18 ~ 40岁,ASA身体状态为I和II的患者120例,男女不限,随机分为两组,每组60例。他们在注射异丙酚前静脉注射利多卡因2ml (20mg /ml)或芬太尼2ml (50mcg /ml)作为预处理。结果:利多卡因作为注射前用药的疗效(96.7%)高于芬太尼(85.0%)。在利多卡因组中,2.3%的参与者经历了疼痛,而芬太尼组为15% (P<0.05)。结论:与芬太尼相比,利多卡因预处理对异丙酚注射疼痛的预防效果更好。关键词:比较,芬太尼,利ignocaine,异丙酚,疼痛
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the Pretreatment with Lignocaine 40 mg and Fentanyl 100 ug as an Adjuvant for Preclusion of Pain Associated with Intravenous Propofol Injection
Abstract Background: Propofol (2,6-di-isopropylphenol) is one of the most favored drugs used for induction of anesthesia. Pain on injection is a common problem. Various methods have been tried to alleviate this pain but with conflicting results. Objective: To compare effectiveness of lignocaine versus fentanyl in patients receiving propofol for general anesthesia in population of Pakistan who come to PIMS hospital in Islamabad. Materials and Methods: 120 participants of either sex, between 18 and 40 years of age, belonging to ASA physical status I and II, undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, were randomized into two equal groups of 60 participants. They received, intravenously, either lignocaine 2 ml (20 mg/ml )or fentanyl 2 ml (50 mcg/mL) as a pretreatment before propofol injection. Results: The efficacy of lignocaine as a pretreatment drug injection was higher (96.7%) compared to fentanyl (85.0%). In the lignocaine group, 2.3% of the participants experienced pain as compared with 15% in the fentanyl group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with fentanyl, lignocaine pretreatment was more effective in preventing pain on propofol injection. KEY WORDS: Comparison, Fentanyl, LIgnocaine, Propofol, Pain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信