液相色谱-质谱联用多种消化方法鉴定糖果基质中猪明胶标记物的应用

Kifayati Rosiyanti Dewi, Feri Kusnandar, Nancy Dewi Yuliana, Maya Ismayati, Nissa Nurfajrin Solihat, Handy Riantana, Heryani Heryani
{"title":"液相色谱-质谱联用多种消化方法鉴定糖果基质中猪明胶标记物的应用","authors":"Kifayati Rosiyanti Dewi, Feri Kusnandar, Nancy Dewi Yuliana, Maya Ismayati, Nissa Nurfajrin Solihat, Handy Riantana, Heryani Heryani","doi":"10.15575/ijhar.v5i2.21191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gelatin is a high-risk ingredient in terms of its halal status. Liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to identify the source of gelatin based on marker peptides and proved to deliver higher reliability than other methods. However, the digestion method is essential before LC-MS/MS analysis. This research evaluated different digestion methods against selected porcine gelatin marker peptides and assessed LC-MS/MS sensitivity through adulteration experiments in various mixed matrices. The study involved three digestion methods (conventional, microwave, and ultrasound) before LC-MS/MS analysis to determine the most effective method for detecting marker peptide targets from porcine gelatin. The appropriate method was applied to isolate porcine gelatin peptides in the matrices of bovine gelatin and confectionery products (lozenges, marshmallows, and soft candy) at concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, and 1% (w/w). Relative detection limit values were determined. The results showed that conventional digestion treatment yielded a higher marker peptide detection rate than microwave and ultrasound digestion. Meanwhile, the detection limit of porcine gelatin in bovine gelatin ranged from 0.09 to 0.89%, depending on the marker peptide used, and could be significantly detected at a concentration of 1% in the confectionery product. The marker peptide TGQPGAVGPAGIR exhibited the highest stability, as it was detectable at the lowest concentration across all mixed matrices. The LC-MS/MS method has been proven to afford sensitive results and has the potential to serve as an alternative for detection of halal status.","PeriodicalId":410025,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Halal Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of LC-MS/MS Coupled with Various Digestion Methods for the Identification of Porcine Gelatin Markers in Confectionery Matrices\",\"authors\":\"Kifayati Rosiyanti Dewi, Feri Kusnandar, Nancy Dewi Yuliana, Maya Ismayati, Nissa Nurfajrin Solihat, Handy Riantana, Heryani Heryani\",\"doi\":\"10.15575/ijhar.v5i2.21191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gelatin is a high-risk ingredient in terms of its halal status. Liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to identify the source of gelatin based on marker peptides and proved to deliver higher reliability than other methods. However, the digestion method is essential before LC-MS/MS analysis. This research evaluated different digestion methods against selected porcine gelatin marker peptides and assessed LC-MS/MS sensitivity through adulteration experiments in various mixed matrices. The study involved three digestion methods (conventional, microwave, and ultrasound) before LC-MS/MS analysis to determine the most effective method for detecting marker peptide targets from porcine gelatin. The appropriate method was applied to isolate porcine gelatin peptides in the matrices of bovine gelatin and confectionery products (lozenges, marshmallows, and soft candy) at concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, and 1% (w/w). Relative detection limit values were determined. The results showed that conventional digestion treatment yielded a higher marker peptide detection rate than microwave and ultrasound digestion. Meanwhile, the detection limit of porcine gelatin in bovine gelatin ranged from 0.09 to 0.89%, depending on the marker peptide used, and could be significantly detected at a concentration of 1% in the confectionery product. The marker peptide TGQPGAVGPAGIR exhibited the highest stability, as it was detectable at the lowest concentration across all mixed matrices. The LC-MS/MS method has been proven to afford sensitive results and has the potential to serve as an alternative for detection of halal status.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of Halal Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of Halal Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15575/ijhar.v5i2.21191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Halal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15575/ijhar.v5i2.21191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

就其清真身份而言,明胶是一种高风险成分。采用液相色谱-质谱联用技术(LC-MS/MS)对明胶进行了标记肽来源鉴定,其可靠性高于其他方法。然而,在LC-MS/MS分析之前,消化法是必不可少的。本研究对猪明胶标记肽的不同消化方法进行了评价,并通过掺假实验对不同混合基质的LC-MS/MS敏感性进行了评价。在LC-MS/MS分析之前,研究了三种消化方法(常规、微波和超声),以确定检测猪明胶中标记肽目标的最有效方法。采用合适的方法,分别在0.01、0.1和1% (w/w)的浓度下,从牛明胶和糖果产品(含片、棉花糖和软糖)的基质中分离猪明胶肽。确定了相对检测极限值。结果表明,常规消化处理对标记肽的检出率高于微波和超声消化处理。同时,牛明胶中猪明胶的检出限在0.09% ~ 0.89%之间,根据所使用的标记肽的不同,在糖果产品中浓度为1%时可以显著检出。标记肽TGQPGAVGPAGIR表现出最高的稳定性,因为它在所有混合基质中的浓度最低。LC-MS/MS方法已被证明能够提供敏感的结果,并且有潜力作为清真状态检测的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of LC-MS/MS Coupled with Various Digestion Methods for the Identification of Porcine Gelatin Markers in Confectionery Matrices
Gelatin is a high-risk ingredient in terms of its halal status. Liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to identify the source of gelatin based on marker peptides and proved to deliver higher reliability than other methods. However, the digestion method is essential before LC-MS/MS analysis. This research evaluated different digestion methods against selected porcine gelatin marker peptides and assessed LC-MS/MS sensitivity through adulteration experiments in various mixed matrices. The study involved three digestion methods (conventional, microwave, and ultrasound) before LC-MS/MS analysis to determine the most effective method for detecting marker peptide targets from porcine gelatin. The appropriate method was applied to isolate porcine gelatin peptides in the matrices of bovine gelatin and confectionery products (lozenges, marshmallows, and soft candy) at concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, and 1% (w/w). Relative detection limit values were determined. The results showed that conventional digestion treatment yielded a higher marker peptide detection rate than microwave and ultrasound digestion. Meanwhile, the detection limit of porcine gelatin in bovine gelatin ranged from 0.09 to 0.89%, depending on the marker peptide used, and could be significantly detected at a concentration of 1% in the confectionery product. The marker peptide TGQPGAVGPAGIR exhibited the highest stability, as it was detectable at the lowest concentration across all mixed matrices. The LC-MS/MS method has been proven to afford sensitive results and has the potential to serve as an alternative for detection of halal status.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信