情色逻辑的基本方面与经验认知问题在教学研究中的作用

Danuta Urbaniak-Zając
{"title":"情色逻辑的基本方面与经验认知问题在教学研究中的作用","authors":"Danuta Urbaniak-Zając","doi":"10.12775/pbe.2023.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article approaches the basic aspects of the erotetic logic in order to highlight the complexity of the inquiry situation. This complexity is overshadowed by the patterns of everyday communication (after all, everyone has asked questions multiple times). In research practice, the linguistic question form is assumed by the research problem and/or research objectives, and – in cognition based on communication processes – by research tools. The author advocates a clear distinction between questions that determine the examined object and research objectives that justify the examination of this very object. In the context of research tools, she proposes a differentiation between questions about information and questions about experiences, which is relevant to the basic questioning intention specific to quantitative (standardised) and qualitative (non-standardised) research.","PeriodicalId":33219,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Badan Edukacyjnych","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Basic Aspects of the Erotetic Logic and the Role of Questions in Empirical Cognition in Pedagogical Research Practice\",\"authors\":\"Danuta Urbaniak-Zając\",\"doi\":\"10.12775/pbe.2023.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article approaches the basic aspects of the erotetic logic in order to highlight the complexity of the inquiry situation. This complexity is overshadowed by the patterns of everyday communication (after all, everyone has asked questions multiple times). In research practice, the linguistic question form is assumed by the research problem and/or research objectives, and – in cognition based on communication processes – by research tools. The author advocates a clear distinction between questions that determine the examined object and research objectives that justify the examination of this very object. In the context of research tools, she proposes a differentiation between questions about information and questions about experiences, which is relevant to the basic questioning intention specific to quantitative (standardised) and qualitative (non-standardised) research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przeglad Badan Edukacyjnych\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przeglad Badan Edukacyjnych\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12775/pbe.2023.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Badan Edukacyjnych","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/pbe.2023.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了情色逻辑的基本方面,以突出探究形势的复杂性。这种复杂性被日常交流的模式所掩盖(毕竟,每个人都问过很多次问题)。在研究实践中,语言问题的形式由研究问题和/或研究目标来假设,而在基于交流过程的认知中,则由研究工具来假设。作者主张明确区分决定被检查对象的问题和证明检查该对象的正当理由的研究目标。在研究工具的背景下,她提出了关于信息的问题和关于经验的问题的区别,这与定量(标准化)和定性(非标准化)研究特有的基本提问意图有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Basic Aspects of the Erotetic Logic and the Role of Questions in Empirical Cognition in Pedagogical Research Practice
The article approaches the basic aspects of the erotetic logic in order to highlight the complexity of the inquiry situation. This complexity is overshadowed by the patterns of everyday communication (after all, everyone has asked questions multiple times). In research practice, the linguistic question form is assumed by the research problem and/or research objectives, and – in cognition based on communication processes – by research tools. The author advocates a clear distinction between questions that determine the examined object and research objectives that justify the examination of this very object. In the context of research tools, she proposes a differentiation between questions about information and questions about experiences, which is relevant to the basic questioning intention specific to quantitative (standardised) and qualitative (non-standardised) research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
50 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信