策略制定:工件的使用和误用,以达到共同的理解

IF 3.8 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Ole Friis, John Bang Mathiasen
{"title":"策略制定:工件的使用和误用,以达到共同的理解","authors":"Ole Friis, John Bang Mathiasen","doi":"10.1177/23409444231202808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Strategists intentionally use artifacts to promote their perception of a prudent strategic choice. Separating artifacts and strategists’ intentionality blurs our understanding of how strategy-making unfolds. Our study addresses the dynamics of strategists’ intentionality and their use of artifacts in strategy-making. The study provides empirical evidence that artifacts act as stand-ins for the strategists’ intentionality, used to guide or misused to curb the strategy-making. The implications of our study contribute to the understanding that (1) we can neither assume that the individuals’ intentionality is predictable nor that the involved strategists achieve a common understanding, (2) strategist–artifact relationships are pivotal to align or misalign different strategists’ interests, (3) the mediating role of artifacts is mutable entailing strategists materializing artifacts and adding text and symbols to intentionally manage the strategy-making, and (4) strategists deliberately use many artifacts to reach the intended strategy, not necessarily implementing the optimal strategy choice. JEL CLASSIFICATION: L190","PeriodicalId":46891,"journal":{"name":"Brq-Business Research Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategy-making: The use and misuse of artifacts to achieve common understanding\",\"authors\":\"Ole Friis, John Bang Mathiasen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23409444231202808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Strategists intentionally use artifacts to promote their perception of a prudent strategic choice. Separating artifacts and strategists’ intentionality blurs our understanding of how strategy-making unfolds. Our study addresses the dynamics of strategists’ intentionality and their use of artifacts in strategy-making. The study provides empirical evidence that artifacts act as stand-ins for the strategists’ intentionality, used to guide or misused to curb the strategy-making. The implications of our study contribute to the understanding that (1) we can neither assume that the individuals’ intentionality is predictable nor that the involved strategists achieve a common understanding, (2) strategist–artifact relationships are pivotal to align or misalign different strategists’ interests, (3) the mediating role of artifacts is mutable entailing strategists materializing artifacts and adding text and symbols to intentionally manage the strategy-making, and (4) strategists deliberately use many artifacts to reach the intended strategy, not necessarily implementing the optimal strategy choice. JEL CLASSIFICATION: L190\",\"PeriodicalId\":46891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brq-Business Research Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brq-Business Research Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444231202808\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brq-Business Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444231202808","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

战略家故意使用人工制品来促进他们对谨慎战略选择的看法。将人为因素和战略家的意向性分开,模糊了我们对战略制定如何展开的理解。我们的研究解决了战略家的意向性和他们在战略制定中使用人工制品的动态。该研究提供了经验证据,表明人工制品充当战略家意向性的替身,用于指导或滥用来抑制战略制定。本研究的启示有助于理解:(1)我们既不能假设个体的意向性是可预测的,也不能假设参与的战略家达成共同的理解;(2)战略家与人工制品的关系对于调整或不调整不同战略家的利益至关重要;(3)人工制品的中介作用是可变的,需要战略家将人工制品物化并添加文本和符号来有意地管理战略制定。(4)战略家故意使用许多工件来达到预期的战略,而不一定实现最优的战略选择。凝胶分类:l190
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategy-making: The use and misuse of artifacts to achieve common understanding
Strategists intentionally use artifacts to promote their perception of a prudent strategic choice. Separating artifacts and strategists’ intentionality blurs our understanding of how strategy-making unfolds. Our study addresses the dynamics of strategists’ intentionality and their use of artifacts in strategy-making. The study provides empirical evidence that artifacts act as stand-ins for the strategists’ intentionality, used to guide or misused to curb the strategy-making. The implications of our study contribute to the understanding that (1) we can neither assume that the individuals’ intentionality is predictable nor that the involved strategists achieve a common understanding, (2) strategist–artifact relationships are pivotal to align or misalign different strategists’ interests, (3) the mediating role of artifacts is mutable entailing strategists materializing artifacts and adding text and symbols to intentionally manage the strategy-making, and (4) strategists deliberately use many artifacts to reach the intended strategy, not necessarily implementing the optimal strategy choice. JEL CLASSIFICATION: L190
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信