国际人道法下军事人工智能技术对战斗员地位的归因

IF 1.7 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Global Society Pub Date : 2023-09-11 DOI:10.1080/13600826.2023.2251509

Mustafa Can Sati

{"title":"国际人道法下军事人工智能技术对战斗员地位的归因","authors":"Mustafa Can Sati","doi":"10.1080/13600826.2023.2251509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concepts of means of warfare and combatants are not comparable or on the same scale in IHL. Yet the human-like performances of AI technologies, such as independent decision-making, may blur the line between these two concepts. This may also lead one to compare the technology with a human combatant rather than with other means of warfare. In this context, this paper questions the attributability of combatant status to military AI technologies by concentrating on the scope of the combatant concept. Contrary to some existing studies that found combatant status insufficient for machines based on ethics or behavioural human-machine differences, this study examines why combatant status is unsuitable for military AI technologies from a legal conceptual perspective, even in their most intelligent and independent forms by visiting terms—membership to armed forces, armed forces and prisoners of war (POW)—that are relevant to disclose the scope of the term combatant.","PeriodicalId":46197,"journal":{"name":"Global Society","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Attributability of Combatant Status to Military AI Technologies under International Humanitarian Law\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Can Sati\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13600826.2023.2251509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concepts of means of warfare and combatants are not comparable or on the same scale in IHL. Yet the human-like performances of AI technologies, such as independent decision-making, may blur the line between these two concepts. This may also lead one to compare the technology with a human combatant rather than with other means of warfare. In this context, this paper questions the attributability of combatant status to military AI technologies by concentrating on the scope of the combatant concept. Contrary to some existing studies that found combatant status insufficient for machines based on ethics or behavioural human-machine differences, this study examines why combatant status is unsuitable for military AI technologies from a legal conceptual perspective, even in their most intelligent and independent forms by visiting terms—membership to armed forces, armed forces and prisoners of war (POW)—that are relevant to disclose the scope of the term combatant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Society\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2023.2251509\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2023.2251509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在国际人道法中，作战手段和战斗人员的概念没有可比性，也没有相同的尺度。然而，人工智能技术的类似人类的表现，比如独立决策，可能会模糊这两个概念之间的界限。这也可能导致人们将这项技术与人类战斗人员进行比较，而不是与其他战争手段进行比较。在此背景下，本文通过关注战斗人员概念的范围，质疑战斗人员状态对军事人工智能技术的归因性。现有的一些研究发现，基于伦理或行为的人机差异，战斗人员的身份不足以适用于机器，与此相反，本研究从法律概念的角度审视了为什么战斗人员的身份不适合军事人工智能技术，即使是在最智能和独立的形式下，通过访问条款——武装部队成员、武装部队成员和战俘(POW)——这些条款与披露战斗人员一词的范围有关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Attributability of Combatant Status to Military AI Technologies under International Humanitarian Law

The concepts of means of warfare and combatants are not comparable or on the same scale in IHL. Yet the human-like performances of AI technologies, such as independent decision-making, may blur the line between these two concepts. This may also lead one to compare the technology with a human combatant rather than with other means of warfare. In this context, this paper questions the attributability of combatant status to military AI technologies by concentrating on the scope of the combatant concept. Contrary to some existing studies that found combatant status insufficient for machines based on ethics or behavioural human-machine differences, this study examines why combatant status is unsuitable for military AI technologies from a legal conceptual perspective, even in their most intelligent and independent forms by visiting terms—membership to armed forces, armed forces and prisoners of war (POW)—that are relevant to disclose the scope of the term combatant.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Global Society INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

6.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Global Society covers the new agenda in global and international relations and encourages innovative approaches to the study of global and international issues from a range of disciplines. It promotes the analysis of transactions at multiple levels, and in particular, the way in which these transactions blur the distinction between the sub-national, national, transnational, international and global levels. An ever integrating global society raises a number of issues for global and international relations which do not fit comfortably within established "Paradigms" Among these are the international and global consequences of nationalism and struggles for identity, migration, racism, religious fundamentalism, terrorism and criminal activities.