在激进的自我吞噬计划中识别革命性的力量

IF 8.2 1区社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY

Dialogues in Human Geography Pub Date : 2023-09-11 DOI:10.1177/20438206231200713

Brian M. Napoletano, Pedro S. Urquijo, Brett Clark, John Bellamy Foster

{"title":"在激进的自我吞噬计划中识别革命性的力量","authors":"Brian M. Napoletano, Pedro S. Urquijo, Brett Clark, John Bellamy Foster","doi":"10.1177/20438206231200713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In our article, ‘Henri Lefebvre's Conception of Nature-Society in the Revolutionary Project of Autogestion’, we sought to open an important dialog on the relation of autogestion to the ecological struggle for metabolic restoration. The four insightful commentaries in this dialog have taken up this argument and moved it forward substantially. Here, we briefly reflect on a central problem raised by these four interventions and Lefebvre's theory of autogestion more generally: The agent of radical social transformation.","PeriodicalId":47300,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in Human Geography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying the revolutionary agent in the radical project of autogestion\",\"authors\":\"Brian M. Napoletano, Pedro S. Urquijo, Brett Clark, John Bellamy Foster\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20438206231200713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In our article, ‘Henri Lefebvre's Conception of Nature-Society in the Revolutionary Project of Autogestion’, we sought to open an important dialog on the relation of autogestion to the ecological struggle for metabolic restoration. The four insightful commentaries in this dialog have taken up this argument and moved it forward substantially. Here, we briefly reflect on a central problem raised by these four interventions and Lefebvre's theory of autogestion more generally: The agent of radical social transformation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialogues in Human Geography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialogues in Human Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206231200713\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in Human Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206231200713","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在我们的文章“亨利·列斐伏尔的自然-社会概念在革命的自孕计划”中，我们试图开启一个关于自孕与新陈代谢恢复的生态斗争关系的重要对话。在这篇对话中，四篇有见地的评论对这一论点进行了阐述，并将其实质性地向前推进。在这里，我们简要地反思由这四种干预和列斐伏尔的自摄理论提出的一个中心问题:激进的社会转型的代理人。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Identifying the revolutionary agent in the radical project of autogestion

In our article, ‘Henri Lefebvre's Conception of Nature-Society in the Revolutionary Project of Autogestion’, we sought to open an important dialog on the relation of autogestion to the ecological struggle for metabolic restoration. The four insightful commentaries in this dialog have taken up this argument and moved it forward substantially. Here, we briefly reflect on a central problem raised by these four interventions and Lefebvre's theory of autogestion more generally: The agent of radical social transformation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Dialogues in Human Geography GEOGRAPHY-

CiteScore

8.00

自引率

4.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Dialogues in Human Geography aims to foster open and critical debate on the philosophical, methodological, and pedagogical underpinnings of geographic thought and practice. The journal publishes articles, accompanied by responses, that critique current thinking and practice while charting future directions for geographic thought, empirical research, and pedagogy. Dialogues is theoretically oriented, forward-looking, and seeks to publish original and innovative work that expands the boundaries of geographical theory, practice, and pedagogy through a unique format of open peer commentary. This format encourages engaged dialogue. The journal's scope encompasses the broader agenda of human geography within the context of social sciences, humanities, and environmental sciences, as well as specific ideas, debates, and practices within disciplinary subfields. It is relevant and useful to those interested in all aspects of the discipline.