高危险行业管理水平的应急风险管理和复原力工程评估

IF 0.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Leila Omidi, Hossein Karimi, Gholamreza Moradi
{"title":"高危险行业管理水平的应急风险管理和复原力工程评估","authors":"Leila Omidi, Hossein Karimi, Gholamreza Moradi","doi":"10.1080/09617353.2023.2263728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe current study aimed to, firstly, assess the roles of crisis management systems, resilience engineering, and proactive risk management in emergency management of high-risk manufacturing industry and, secondly, to compute the relative contribution of each factor by the entropy approach. Data were collected using three questionnaires. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was administered to rank study alternatives, which include managers at different hierarchical levels encompassing senior managers, middle‐level managers, and operating-level managers. The results of the entropy method considering crisis management data suggested that human and organisational aspects had the highest impact on emergency management. The highest percentages of influence considering resilience engineering factors were associated with flexibility and management commitment to safety. Among proactive risk management dimensions, training and communication about safety and risks were the most influential dimensions. TOPSIS results demonstrated that there are some gaps in the emergency management system of the plant from the operating managers’ perspectives. This means that operating managers believed that the emergency management system and resilience level should be improved in the plant to enhance the levels of safety and emergency risk management of the industry.Keywords: Emergency managementresilience engineeringproactive risk managemententropyTOPSIS AcknowledgementsThe authors would also like to thank the management of the study industry for their participation.Disclosure statementThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.Additional informationFundingThis research was funded by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences [grant number: 65781; the ethical code: IR.TBZMED.REC.1399.716].Notes on contributorsLeila OmidiLeila Omidi is an assistant professor at the Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Her research focuses on process safety, safety behaviour, and human factors influencing safety.Hossein KarimiHossein Karimi holds an MSc in Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE) from Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran. His research interests include organizational safety, occupational safety, and safety behavior.Gholamreza MoradiGholamreza Moradi is an assistant professor at the Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran. His research interests include occupational health and safety.","PeriodicalId":45573,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Reliability Quality and Safety Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of emergency risk management and resilience engineering at management levels of a high hazard industry\",\"authors\":\"Leila Omidi, Hossein Karimi, Gholamreza Moradi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09617353.2023.2263728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThe current study aimed to, firstly, assess the roles of crisis management systems, resilience engineering, and proactive risk management in emergency management of high-risk manufacturing industry and, secondly, to compute the relative contribution of each factor by the entropy approach. Data were collected using three questionnaires. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was administered to rank study alternatives, which include managers at different hierarchical levels encompassing senior managers, middle‐level managers, and operating-level managers. The results of the entropy method considering crisis management data suggested that human and organisational aspects had the highest impact on emergency management. The highest percentages of influence considering resilience engineering factors were associated with flexibility and management commitment to safety. Among proactive risk management dimensions, training and communication about safety and risks were the most influential dimensions. TOPSIS results demonstrated that there are some gaps in the emergency management system of the plant from the operating managers’ perspectives. This means that operating managers believed that the emergency management system and resilience level should be improved in the plant to enhance the levels of safety and emergency risk management of the industry.Keywords: Emergency managementresilience engineeringproactive risk managemententropyTOPSIS AcknowledgementsThe authors would also like to thank the management of the study industry for their participation.Disclosure statementThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.Additional informationFundingThis research was funded by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences [grant number: 65781; the ethical code: IR.TBZMED.REC.1399.716].Notes on contributorsLeila OmidiLeila Omidi is an assistant professor at the Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Her research focuses on process safety, safety behaviour, and human factors influencing safety.Hossein KarimiHossein Karimi holds an MSc in Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE) from Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran. His research interests include organizational safety, occupational safety, and safety behavior.Gholamreza MoradiGholamreza Moradi is an assistant professor at the Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran. His research interests include occupational health and safety.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Reliability Quality and Safety Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Reliability Quality and Safety Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09617353.2023.2263728\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Reliability Quality and Safety Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09617353.2023.2263728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究首先评估危机管理系统、弹性工程和前瞻性风险管理在高风险制造业应急管理中的作用,然后利用熵值法计算各因素的相对贡献度。数据通过三份问卷收集。采用理想解决方案相似性排序偏好技术(TOPSIS)对研究备选方案进行排序,研究备选方案包括不同层次的管理人员,包括高级管理人员、中层管理人员和运营级管理人员。考虑危机管理数据的熵值法的结果表明,人和组织方面对应急管理的影响最大。考虑弹性工程因素的最高影响百分比与灵活性和管理对安全的承诺有关。在主动风险管理方面,有关安全和风险的培训和沟通是最具影响力的方面。TOPSIS结果表明,从运营管理者的角度来看,该工厂的应急管理体系存在一定的差距。这意味着运营管理者认为工厂的应急管理体系和应变能力水平有待提高,以提升行业的安全和应急风险管理水平。关键词:应急管理弹性工程主动风险管理熵熵topsis致谢作者也要感谢研究行业管理层的参与。披露声明作者声明,他们没有已知的竞争经济利益或个人关系,可能会影响本文所报道的工作。本研究由大不里士医学科学大学资助[资助号:65781;伦理准则:IR.TBZMED.REC.1399.716]。作者简介:sleila Omidi,伊朗德黑兰医科大学职业健康工程系助理教授。她的研究重点是过程安全、安全行为和影响安全的人为因素。Hossein Karimi拥有伊朗大不里士医科大学健康、安全和环境(HSE)硕士学位。他的研究兴趣包括组织安全、职业安全和安全行为。Gholamreza Moradi是伊朗大不里士医科大学职业健康工程系的助理教授。主要研究方向为职业健康与安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of emergency risk management and resilience engineering at management levels of a high hazard industry
AbstractThe current study aimed to, firstly, assess the roles of crisis management systems, resilience engineering, and proactive risk management in emergency management of high-risk manufacturing industry and, secondly, to compute the relative contribution of each factor by the entropy approach. Data were collected using three questionnaires. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was administered to rank study alternatives, which include managers at different hierarchical levels encompassing senior managers, middle‐level managers, and operating-level managers. The results of the entropy method considering crisis management data suggested that human and organisational aspects had the highest impact on emergency management. The highest percentages of influence considering resilience engineering factors were associated with flexibility and management commitment to safety. Among proactive risk management dimensions, training and communication about safety and risks were the most influential dimensions. TOPSIS results demonstrated that there are some gaps in the emergency management system of the plant from the operating managers’ perspectives. This means that operating managers believed that the emergency management system and resilience level should be improved in the plant to enhance the levels of safety and emergency risk management of the industry.Keywords: Emergency managementresilience engineeringproactive risk managemententropyTOPSIS AcknowledgementsThe authors would also like to thank the management of the study industry for their participation.Disclosure statementThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.Additional informationFundingThis research was funded by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences [grant number: 65781; the ethical code: IR.TBZMED.REC.1399.716].Notes on contributorsLeila OmidiLeila Omidi is an assistant professor at the Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Her research focuses on process safety, safety behaviour, and human factors influencing safety.Hossein KarimiHossein Karimi holds an MSc in Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE) from Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran. His research interests include organizational safety, occupational safety, and safety behavior.Gholamreza MoradiGholamreza Moradi is an assistant professor at the Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran. His research interests include occupational health and safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: IJRQSE is a refereed journal focusing on both the theoretical and practical aspects of reliability, quality, and safety in engineering. The journal is intended to cover a broad spectrum of issues in manufacturing, computing, software, aerospace, control, nuclear systems, power systems, communication systems, and electronics. Papers are sought in the theoretical domain as well as in such practical fields as industry and laboratory research. The journal is published quarterly, March, June, September and December. It is intended to bridge the gap between the theoretical experts and practitioners in the academic, scientific, government, and business communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信