教会作为机构:天主教期刊《大公会议》与《公报》之争

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
Aleksei Chernyi
{"title":"教会作为机构:天主教期刊《大公会议》与《公报》之争","authors":"Aleksei Chernyi","doi":"10.15382/sturi2023109.46-66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses the polemics on the institutional and authoritative aspects of life of the Catholic Church in the international Catholic journals “Concilium” and “Communio”, created in the first few years following the Second Vatican Council. The former welcomed reforms and sought to extend the conciliar innovations to various spheres of Catholic Church life; the latter was represented mainly by conservative authors. These journals, which numbered among their authors the most prominent theologians of their time, express different views on the post-conciliar development of Catholicism, illustrate the long-standing conflict between modernism and traditionalism, reveal the specific make-up of the modern Catholic academic community as well as a new phase in the development of Catholic mass-media. The author concludes that the institutional aspect of the life of the Catholic Church constituted an important part of the discussion in these journals, especially in the 1970-ies - the early 1980-ies. Whereas the authors of “Concilium” advocated for democratization of Church life, the limitation of authoritative powers of the bearers of the Church office and the distribution of authority in the Catholic Church, “Communio” attempted to protect the authority of Catholic magisterium, warn against a hasty reinterpretation of the institutional power and emphasize its inextricable connection with the nature of the Church itself. At the same time, “Communio” took care to meet the requirements of the academic genre, while “Concilium” expressed a high degree of critical anti-institutional pathos, which the declared intention to accept Church reform does not directly imply. The texts published in the journals demonstrate a deep-rooted conflict, which dates back to the period of fighting modernism, and, being still unresolved, continues to determine the life of the Catholic Church. The contrasting editorial policies reflect, on the one hand, the intensifying polarization and the pluralistic character of Catholic theology after the Second Vatican Council, on the other hand – a close interaction between the religious and the socio-political life spheres of modern Catholics, which renders the analysis of religious communication even more relevant.","PeriodicalId":40777,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo Gumanitarnogo Universiteta-Seriya I-Bogoslovie-Filosofiya-Religiovedenie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Church as institution: polemics between catholic journals \\\"Concilium\\\" and \\\"Communio\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Aleksei Chernyi\",\"doi\":\"10.15382/sturi2023109.46-66\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyses the polemics on the institutional and authoritative aspects of life of the Catholic Church in the international Catholic journals “Concilium” and “Communio”, created in the first few years following the Second Vatican Council. The former welcomed reforms and sought to extend the conciliar innovations to various spheres of Catholic Church life; the latter was represented mainly by conservative authors. These journals, which numbered among their authors the most prominent theologians of their time, express different views on the post-conciliar development of Catholicism, illustrate the long-standing conflict between modernism and traditionalism, reveal the specific make-up of the modern Catholic academic community as well as a new phase in the development of Catholic mass-media. The author concludes that the institutional aspect of the life of the Catholic Church constituted an important part of the discussion in these journals, especially in the 1970-ies - the early 1980-ies. Whereas the authors of “Concilium” advocated for democratization of Church life, the limitation of authoritative powers of the bearers of the Church office and the distribution of authority in the Catholic Church, “Communio” attempted to protect the authority of Catholic magisterium, warn against a hasty reinterpretation of the institutional power and emphasize its inextricable connection with the nature of the Church itself. At the same time, “Communio” took care to meet the requirements of the academic genre, while “Concilium” expressed a high degree of critical anti-institutional pathos, which the declared intention to accept Church reform does not directly imply. The texts published in the journals demonstrate a deep-rooted conflict, which dates back to the period of fighting modernism, and, being still unresolved, continues to determine the life of the Catholic Church. The contrasting editorial policies reflect, on the one hand, the intensifying polarization and the pluralistic character of Catholic theology after the Second Vatican Council, on the other hand – a close interaction between the religious and the socio-political life spheres of modern Catholics, which renders the analysis of religious communication even more relevant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo Gumanitarnogo Universiteta-Seriya I-Bogoslovie-Filosofiya-Religiovedenie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo Gumanitarnogo Universiteta-Seriya I-Bogoslovie-Filosofiya-Religiovedenie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15382/sturi2023109.46-66\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo Gumanitarnogo Universiteta-Seriya I-Bogoslovie-Filosofiya-Religiovedenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15382/sturi2023109.46-66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章分析了在梵蒂冈第二届大公会议之后的最初几年里,国际天主教期刊《Concilium》和《communion》上关于天主教会生活的体制和权威方面的争论。前者欢迎改革,并设法将大公会议的革新扩大到天主教会生活的各个领域;后者主要由保守派作家代表。这些期刊的作者中有当时最杰出的神学家,他们对大公会议后天主教的发展表达了不同的看法,说明了现代主义与传统主义之间长期存在的冲突,揭示了现代天主教学术界的具体构成以及天主教大众媒体发展的新阶段。作者的结论是,天主教会生活的体制方面构成了这些期刊讨论的重要部分,特别是在1970年代- 1980年代初。《大公会议》的作者主张教会生活民主化,限制教会职务人员的权威权力和在天主教会内分配权力,而《公报》则试图保护天主教训诫的权威,警告不要草率地重新解释机构权力,并强调其与教会本身的性质有着不可分割的联系。同时,《公报》小心地满足了学术流派的要求,而《大公会议》则表达了高度的批判反体制的悲怆,而这种悲怆并不直接意味着它宣称要接受教会改革。发表在期刊上的文章显示了一种根深蒂固的冲突,这种冲突可以追溯到与现代主义作斗争的时期,目前仍未得到解决,继续决定着天主教会的生活。这种截然不同的编辑政策,一方面反映了梵蒂冈第二次大公会议后天主教神学两极分化的加剧和多元化特征,另一方面也反映了现代天主教徒的宗教与社会政治生活领域的密切互动,这使得对宗教传播的分析更具现实意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Church as institution: polemics between catholic journals "Concilium" and "Communio"
The article analyses the polemics on the institutional and authoritative aspects of life of the Catholic Church in the international Catholic journals “Concilium” and “Communio”, created in the first few years following the Second Vatican Council. The former welcomed reforms and sought to extend the conciliar innovations to various spheres of Catholic Church life; the latter was represented mainly by conservative authors. These journals, which numbered among their authors the most prominent theologians of their time, express different views on the post-conciliar development of Catholicism, illustrate the long-standing conflict between modernism and traditionalism, reveal the specific make-up of the modern Catholic academic community as well as a new phase in the development of Catholic mass-media. The author concludes that the institutional aspect of the life of the Catholic Church constituted an important part of the discussion in these journals, especially in the 1970-ies - the early 1980-ies. Whereas the authors of “Concilium” advocated for democratization of Church life, the limitation of authoritative powers of the bearers of the Church office and the distribution of authority in the Catholic Church, “Communio” attempted to protect the authority of Catholic magisterium, warn against a hasty reinterpretation of the institutional power and emphasize its inextricable connection with the nature of the Church itself. At the same time, “Communio” took care to meet the requirements of the academic genre, while “Concilium” expressed a high degree of critical anti-institutional pathos, which the declared intention to accept Church reform does not directly imply. The texts published in the journals demonstrate a deep-rooted conflict, which dates back to the period of fighting modernism, and, being still unresolved, continues to determine the life of the Catholic Church. The contrasting editorial policies reflect, on the one hand, the intensifying polarization and the pluralistic character of Catholic theology after the Second Vatican Council, on the other hand – a close interaction between the religious and the socio-political life spheres of modern Catholics, which renders the analysis of religious communication even more relevant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信