肩袖疾病:土耳其当前物理治疗实践的调查

Bahar AYBERK, Bahar ÖZGÜL, Julie BURY, Mine Gülden POLAT
{"title":"肩袖疾病:土耳其当前物理治疗实践的调查","authors":"Bahar AYBERK, Bahar ÖZGÜL, Julie BURY, Mine Gülden POLAT","doi":"10.21653/tjpr.1233425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: One of the most important factors guiding the physiotherapy program for rotator cuff disorders (RCD) is the clinical preferences of the physiotherapist in light of the evidence. However, the management parameters are remarkably variable between physiotherapists. It was aimed to describe the current physiotherapy practice of Turkish physiotherapists for the management of RCD and to explore its parallelism with the research evidence, and with the clinical perspective in European Countries. 
 Methods: A cross-sectional online survey based on a clinical scenario that describes a typical patient with symptoms of RCD was conducted during July/August 2020. Descriptive responses of 104 physiotherapists were reported and analyzed by grouping physiotherapists with special interest (SI) who have further clinical experience or specialized training on RCD and no special interest (NSI). 
 Results: The most preferred approaches were mobilization (82), scapular stabilization exercises (82), advice/education (71), and taping (62) considering all the participants. The preference rate of cold therapy (χ2=4.303, p=0.038) and isometric exercises (χ2=4.248, p=0.039) were significantly higher for physiotherapists with SI rather than NSI group. 
 Conclusions: The most preferred management strategies of mobilization, exercise, and advice/education have been aligned with the preferences of physiotherapists from European countries and the current research evidence. However, passive modalities were also highly preferred. The management strategies differ between the physiotherapists who have SI and NSI. The high degree of practice variability and passive treatment preference of physiotherapists for the patients with RCD might be due to a lack of following the current literature evidence regularly.","PeriodicalId":289913,"journal":{"name":"Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ROTATOR CUFF DISORDERS: A SURVEY OF CURRENT PHYSIOTHERAPY PRACTICE IN TURKEY\",\"authors\":\"Bahar AYBERK, Bahar ÖZGÜL, Julie BURY, Mine Gülden POLAT\",\"doi\":\"10.21653/tjpr.1233425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: One of the most important factors guiding the physiotherapy program for rotator cuff disorders (RCD) is the clinical preferences of the physiotherapist in light of the evidence. However, the management parameters are remarkably variable between physiotherapists. It was aimed to describe the current physiotherapy practice of Turkish physiotherapists for the management of RCD and to explore its parallelism with the research evidence, and with the clinical perspective in European Countries. 
 Methods: A cross-sectional online survey based on a clinical scenario that describes a typical patient with symptoms of RCD was conducted during July/August 2020. Descriptive responses of 104 physiotherapists were reported and analyzed by grouping physiotherapists with special interest (SI) who have further clinical experience or specialized training on RCD and no special interest (NSI). 
 Results: The most preferred approaches were mobilization (82), scapular stabilization exercises (82), advice/education (71), and taping (62) considering all the participants. The preference rate of cold therapy (χ2=4.303, p=0.038) and isometric exercises (χ2=4.248, p=0.039) were significantly higher for physiotherapists with SI rather than NSI group. 
 Conclusions: The most preferred management strategies of mobilization, exercise, and advice/education have been aligned with the preferences of physiotherapists from European countries and the current research evidence. However, passive modalities were also highly preferred. The management strategies differ between the physiotherapists who have SI and NSI. The high degree of practice variability and passive treatment preference of physiotherapists for the patients with RCD might be due to a lack of following the current literature evidence regularly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":289913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.1233425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.1233425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:指导肩袖疾病(RCD)物理治疗方案的最重要因素之一是物理治疗师根据证据的临床偏好。然而,理疗师之间的管理参数差异很大。目的是描述当前土耳其物理治疗师对RCD管理的物理治疗实践,并探讨其与研究证据的相似性,以及与欧洲国家的临床观点。& # x0D;方法:在2020年7月/ 8月期间,基于描述RCD典型症状患者的临床场景进行横断面在线调查。对104名物理治疗师的描述性反应进行了报告和分析,并将具有特殊兴趣(SI)的物理治疗师分组,这些物理治疗师在RCD方面有进一步的临床经验或专门培训,而没有特殊兴趣(NSI)。& # x0D;结果:考虑到所有参与者,最受欢迎的方法是活动(82),肩胛骨稳定练习(82),建议/教育(71)和胶带(62)。自伤组物理治疗师对冷疗法的偏好率(χ2=4.303, p=0.038)和等长运动的偏好率(χ2=4.248, p=0.039)显著高于自伤组。& # x0D;结论:最受欢迎的管理策略是运动、锻炼和建议/教育,这些策略与欧洲国家物理治疗师的偏好和当前的研究证据一致。然而,被动模式也被高度推荐。有自伤和自伤的物理治疗师的治疗策略不同。物理治疗师对RCD患者的高度实践变异性和被动治疗偏好可能是由于缺乏对现有文献证据的定期跟踪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ROTATOR CUFF DISORDERS: A SURVEY OF CURRENT PHYSIOTHERAPY PRACTICE IN TURKEY
Purpose: One of the most important factors guiding the physiotherapy program for rotator cuff disorders (RCD) is the clinical preferences of the physiotherapist in light of the evidence. However, the management parameters are remarkably variable between physiotherapists. It was aimed to describe the current physiotherapy practice of Turkish physiotherapists for the management of RCD and to explore its parallelism with the research evidence, and with the clinical perspective in European Countries. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey based on a clinical scenario that describes a typical patient with symptoms of RCD was conducted during July/August 2020. Descriptive responses of 104 physiotherapists were reported and analyzed by grouping physiotherapists with special interest (SI) who have further clinical experience or specialized training on RCD and no special interest (NSI). Results: The most preferred approaches were mobilization (82), scapular stabilization exercises (82), advice/education (71), and taping (62) considering all the participants. The preference rate of cold therapy (χ2=4.303, p=0.038) and isometric exercises (χ2=4.248, p=0.039) were significantly higher for physiotherapists with SI rather than NSI group. Conclusions: The most preferred management strategies of mobilization, exercise, and advice/education have been aligned with the preferences of physiotherapists from European countries and the current research evidence. However, passive modalities were also highly preferred. The management strategies differ between the physiotherapists who have SI and NSI. The high degree of practice variability and passive treatment preference of physiotherapists for the patients with RCD might be due to a lack of following the current literature evidence regularly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信