通过发展援助在个人和社区两级实现可持续性

Jisun Kim, Yoon Ah Shin
{"title":"通过发展援助在个人和社区两级实现可持续性","authors":"Jisun Kim, Yoon Ah Shin","doi":"10.1080/12294659.2023.2265120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis study uses a Saemaul Undong overseas development assistance (ODA) project in Rwanda as a case study to develop a new theory regarding aid recipients achieving sustainability. Although sustainability has emerged as a major concern in the international development community, there is still limited research on the sustainability of development interventions and means of practically achieving sustainability. This study fills this gap in the literature by exploring the process of achieving sustainability and assessing the dynamics among the factors that contribute to this process. Our findings reveal that sustainability is an accumulative continuum from the individual level to the community level, with different interventions and governance structures required to advance from one level to another. This study offers practical lessons for donor governments and agencies regarding the types of interventions that they should provide and the roles that they should play depending on the relevant level of sustainability.KEYWORDS: Aid dependencymulti-level sustainabilitysustainabilitySaemaul Undong ODAgovernance AcknowledgmentsWe thank the interviewees for sharing their stories with us and Dr. Tonghee Park for his feedback on and assistance with the analysis, which greatly improved the research.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. There are three prevailing interpretations of social sustainability in relation to two other pillars: environmental sustainability and economic sustainability (Chiu, Citation2003, Vallance et al., Citation2011). One interpretation equates social sustainability with environmental sustainability. The second interpretation considers social sustainability to be a social precondition for environmental sustainability. The third interpretation – a people-centered approach – is related to improving equity and social justice for this and future generations.2. The following impacts of Saemaul Undong have been reported: 1) an increase in rural household income from KRW 360,000 in 1971 to KRW 2,230,000 in 1979; 2) improvements in social infrastructure, including upgraded village paths and housing, the construction of community facilities, and electrification; 3) the accumulation of social capital and the empowerment of communities; and 4) the growth of civil society through villagers’ participation (Asian Development Bank, Citation2012).3. Glaser’s (Citation2005) pure inductive approach has been criticized for delaying the literature review until the end of the data-analysis process, preventing the researcher from having prior knowledge and perceptions. This is important, as GT researchers can achieve the following benefits by conducting an early and ongoing literature review (Dunne, Citation2011; Thornberg, Citation2012; Thornberg & Dunne, Citation2019): 1) a defensible rationale for the selection of a research subject, 2) avoidance of conceptual and methodological pitfalls, and 3) theoretical sensitivity, which helps to develop sensitizing concepts and contextualize the study in the literature.4. Observations and in-depth interviews are important methods of data collection for GT (Strauss, Citation1987). The majority of the interviewees are both participants in and observers of the changes driving sustainability. Interviewing participant observers could increase the validity of the research because 1) they can directly learn about events and people’s behaviors in natural settings (Dewalt & DeWalt, Citation2002, Lecompte, Citation2000, Marshall & Rossman, Citation1989), and 2) they can perceive non-verbal expressions of feelings through close communication with informants who may be unwilling to vocalize those feelings (Schmuck, Citation1997).5. Rwanda has been dependent on foreign aid since 1980, with aid being the country’s main source of capital flow, investment finance, and national budgetary funds (Ezemenari et al., Citation2008).6. Baseline and endline surveys show that 1) the incomes of the villages of Kigarama, Mushimba, and Gihogwe increased by factors of 2, 16, and 18, respectively; 2) income from various sources other than casual farm labor also increased; 3) the amount of money saved at formal institutions, such as local banks, increased by factors from 2 to 12: 4) the percentage of people with medical insurance increased from less than 85% to more than 95% in all three villages; and 5) the percentage of people who graduated from primary school increased from 19% to 34% (Saemaul Foundation, Citation2017). The shift in people’s general mind-set toward self-reliance is also supported by Joo (Citation2015).7. From 2013 to Citation2018, rice field acreage increased from 5.5 ha to 126 ha, and the number of members in the rice cooperatives increased from 114 to 2,321 (Saemaul Foundation, Citation2018).8. After Gyeongsangbuk-do selected pilot countries and villages, the Saemaul Foundation and KOICA finalized the selections through dialogue with national governments and field investigations. Eight selection criteria were applied in this process, including criteria to identify countries with strong demand for poverty reduction, safety, and political stability as well as a commitment by the government (Lim et al., Citation2014).Additional informationNotes on contributorsJisun KimJisun Kim has a master’s degree in public administration at Ewha University. She was involved in the rural development project in Rwanda funded by Korea International Cooperation Agency and is currently working as a Climate Change Programme Assistant at UN-Habitat. Her research interests include community development, sustainable development, and Monitoring and Evaluation.Yoon Ah ShinYoon Ah Shin is a post-doc fellow of ASU-NCEC Sloan fellowship at Global Futures Laboratory in Arizona State University. Her research interests include sustainable development, low carbon governance, emergency management policy, and international development. She is the associate editor of Natural Hazards Review. She has published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, International Review of Public Administration, Policy Sciences, and Ecology and Society.","PeriodicalId":39993,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Public Administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Achieving sustainability at the individual and community levels through development assistance\",\"authors\":\"Jisun Kim, Yoon Ah Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/12294659.2023.2265120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis study uses a Saemaul Undong overseas development assistance (ODA) project in Rwanda as a case study to develop a new theory regarding aid recipients achieving sustainability. Although sustainability has emerged as a major concern in the international development community, there is still limited research on the sustainability of development interventions and means of practically achieving sustainability. This study fills this gap in the literature by exploring the process of achieving sustainability and assessing the dynamics among the factors that contribute to this process. Our findings reveal that sustainability is an accumulative continuum from the individual level to the community level, with different interventions and governance structures required to advance from one level to another. This study offers practical lessons for donor governments and agencies regarding the types of interventions that they should provide and the roles that they should play depending on the relevant level of sustainability.KEYWORDS: Aid dependencymulti-level sustainabilitysustainabilitySaemaul Undong ODAgovernance AcknowledgmentsWe thank the interviewees for sharing their stories with us and Dr. Tonghee Park for his feedback on and assistance with the analysis, which greatly improved the research.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. There are three prevailing interpretations of social sustainability in relation to two other pillars: environmental sustainability and economic sustainability (Chiu, Citation2003, Vallance et al., Citation2011). One interpretation equates social sustainability with environmental sustainability. The second interpretation considers social sustainability to be a social precondition for environmental sustainability. The third interpretation – a people-centered approach – is related to improving equity and social justice for this and future generations.2. The following impacts of Saemaul Undong have been reported: 1) an increase in rural household income from KRW 360,000 in 1971 to KRW 2,230,000 in 1979; 2) improvements in social infrastructure, including upgraded village paths and housing, the construction of community facilities, and electrification; 3) the accumulation of social capital and the empowerment of communities; and 4) the growth of civil society through villagers’ participation (Asian Development Bank, Citation2012).3. Glaser’s (Citation2005) pure inductive approach has been criticized for delaying the literature review until the end of the data-analysis process, preventing the researcher from having prior knowledge and perceptions. This is important, as GT researchers can achieve the following benefits by conducting an early and ongoing literature review (Dunne, Citation2011; Thornberg, Citation2012; Thornberg & Dunne, Citation2019): 1) a defensible rationale for the selection of a research subject, 2) avoidance of conceptual and methodological pitfalls, and 3) theoretical sensitivity, which helps to develop sensitizing concepts and contextualize the study in the literature.4. Observations and in-depth interviews are important methods of data collection for GT (Strauss, Citation1987). The majority of the interviewees are both participants in and observers of the changes driving sustainability. Interviewing participant observers could increase the validity of the research because 1) they can directly learn about events and people’s behaviors in natural settings (Dewalt & DeWalt, Citation2002, Lecompte, Citation2000, Marshall & Rossman, Citation1989), and 2) they can perceive non-verbal expressions of feelings through close communication with informants who may be unwilling to vocalize those feelings (Schmuck, Citation1997).5. Rwanda has been dependent on foreign aid since 1980, with aid being the country’s main source of capital flow, investment finance, and national budgetary funds (Ezemenari et al., Citation2008).6. Baseline and endline surveys show that 1) the incomes of the villages of Kigarama, Mushimba, and Gihogwe increased by factors of 2, 16, and 18, respectively; 2) income from various sources other than casual farm labor also increased; 3) the amount of money saved at formal institutions, such as local banks, increased by factors from 2 to 12: 4) the percentage of people with medical insurance increased from less than 85% to more than 95% in all three villages; and 5) the percentage of people who graduated from primary school increased from 19% to 34% (Saemaul Foundation, Citation2017). The shift in people’s general mind-set toward self-reliance is also supported by Joo (Citation2015).7. From 2013 to Citation2018, rice field acreage increased from 5.5 ha to 126 ha, and the number of members in the rice cooperatives increased from 114 to 2,321 (Saemaul Foundation, Citation2018).8. After Gyeongsangbuk-do selected pilot countries and villages, the Saemaul Foundation and KOICA finalized the selections through dialogue with national governments and field investigations. Eight selection criteria were applied in this process, including criteria to identify countries with strong demand for poverty reduction, safety, and political stability as well as a commitment by the government (Lim et al., Citation2014).Additional informationNotes on contributorsJisun KimJisun Kim has a master’s degree in public administration at Ewha University. She was involved in the rural development project in Rwanda funded by Korea International Cooperation Agency and is currently working as a Climate Change Programme Assistant at UN-Habitat. Her research interests include community development, sustainable development, and Monitoring and Evaluation.Yoon Ah ShinYoon Ah Shin is a post-doc fellow of ASU-NCEC Sloan fellowship at Global Futures Laboratory in Arizona State University. Her research interests include sustainable development, low carbon governance, emergency management policy, and international development. She is the associate editor of Natural Hazards Review. She has published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, International Review of Public Administration, Policy Sciences, and Ecology and Society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Public Administration\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Public Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2023.2265120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2023.2265120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

庆尚北道选定试点国家和村庄后,新村财团和KOICA通过与各国政府的对话和实地调查,最终选定了试点国家和村庄。在这一过程中采用了八项选择标准,包括确定对减贫、安全和政治稳定以及政府承诺有强烈需求的国家的标准(Lim等人,Citation2014)。附加信息撰稿人注:jisun Kim拥有梨花大学公共管理硕士学位。她曾参与韩国国际协力团资助的卢旺达农村发展项目,目前在联合国人居署担任气候变化项目助理。主要研究方向为社区发展、可持续发展、监测与评估。Yoon Ah Shin是亚利桑那州立大学全球期货实验室ASU-NCEC斯隆奖学金博士后研究员。她的研究兴趣包括可持续发展、低碳治理、应急管理政策和国际发展。她是《自然灾害评论》的副主编。她曾在《国际环境研究与公共卫生杂志》、《国际公共管理评论》、《政策科学》和《生态与社会》上发表文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Achieving sustainability at the individual and community levels through development assistance
ABSTRACTThis study uses a Saemaul Undong overseas development assistance (ODA) project in Rwanda as a case study to develop a new theory regarding aid recipients achieving sustainability. Although sustainability has emerged as a major concern in the international development community, there is still limited research on the sustainability of development interventions and means of practically achieving sustainability. This study fills this gap in the literature by exploring the process of achieving sustainability and assessing the dynamics among the factors that contribute to this process. Our findings reveal that sustainability is an accumulative continuum from the individual level to the community level, with different interventions and governance structures required to advance from one level to another. This study offers practical lessons for donor governments and agencies regarding the types of interventions that they should provide and the roles that they should play depending on the relevant level of sustainability.KEYWORDS: Aid dependencymulti-level sustainabilitysustainabilitySaemaul Undong ODAgovernance AcknowledgmentsWe thank the interviewees for sharing their stories with us and Dr. Tonghee Park for his feedback on and assistance with the analysis, which greatly improved the research.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. There are three prevailing interpretations of social sustainability in relation to two other pillars: environmental sustainability and economic sustainability (Chiu, Citation2003, Vallance et al., Citation2011). One interpretation equates social sustainability with environmental sustainability. The second interpretation considers social sustainability to be a social precondition for environmental sustainability. The third interpretation – a people-centered approach – is related to improving equity and social justice for this and future generations.2. The following impacts of Saemaul Undong have been reported: 1) an increase in rural household income from KRW 360,000 in 1971 to KRW 2,230,000 in 1979; 2) improvements in social infrastructure, including upgraded village paths and housing, the construction of community facilities, and electrification; 3) the accumulation of social capital and the empowerment of communities; and 4) the growth of civil society through villagers’ participation (Asian Development Bank, Citation2012).3. Glaser’s (Citation2005) pure inductive approach has been criticized for delaying the literature review until the end of the data-analysis process, preventing the researcher from having prior knowledge and perceptions. This is important, as GT researchers can achieve the following benefits by conducting an early and ongoing literature review (Dunne, Citation2011; Thornberg, Citation2012; Thornberg & Dunne, Citation2019): 1) a defensible rationale for the selection of a research subject, 2) avoidance of conceptual and methodological pitfalls, and 3) theoretical sensitivity, which helps to develop sensitizing concepts and contextualize the study in the literature.4. Observations and in-depth interviews are important methods of data collection for GT (Strauss, Citation1987). The majority of the interviewees are both participants in and observers of the changes driving sustainability. Interviewing participant observers could increase the validity of the research because 1) they can directly learn about events and people’s behaviors in natural settings (Dewalt & DeWalt, Citation2002, Lecompte, Citation2000, Marshall & Rossman, Citation1989), and 2) they can perceive non-verbal expressions of feelings through close communication with informants who may be unwilling to vocalize those feelings (Schmuck, Citation1997).5. Rwanda has been dependent on foreign aid since 1980, with aid being the country’s main source of capital flow, investment finance, and national budgetary funds (Ezemenari et al., Citation2008).6. Baseline and endline surveys show that 1) the incomes of the villages of Kigarama, Mushimba, and Gihogwe increased by factors of 2, 16, and 18, respectively; 2) income from various sources other than casual farm labor also increased; 3) the amount of money saved at formal institutions, such as local banks, increased by factors from 2 to 12: 4) the percentage of people with medical insurance increased from less than 85% to more than 95% in all three villages; and 5) the percentage of people who graduated from primary school increased from 19% to 34% (Saemaul Foundation, Citation2017). The shift in people’s general mind-set toward self-reliance is also supported by Joo (Citation2015).7. From 2013 to Citation2018, rice field acreage increased from 5.5 ha to 126 ha, and the number of members in the rice cooperatives increased from 114 to 2,321 (Saemaul Foundation, Citation2018).8. After Gyeongsangbuk-do selected pilot countries and villages, the Saemaul Foundation and KOICA finalized the selections through dialogue with national governments and field investigations. Eight selection criteria were applied in this process, including criteria to identify countries with strong demand for poverty reduction, safety, and political stability as well as a commitment by the government (Lim et al., Citation2014).Additional informationNotes on contributorsJisun KimJisun Kim has a master’s degree in public administration at Ewha University. She was involved in the rural development project in Rwanda funded by Korea International Cooperation Agency and is currently working as a Climate Change Programme Assistant at UN-Habitat. Her research interests include community development, sustainable development, and Monitoring and Evaluation.Yoon Ah ShinYoon Ah Shin is a post-doc fellow of ASU-NCEC Sloan fellowship at Global Futures Laboratory in Arizona State University. Her research interests include sustainable development, low carbon governance, emergency management policy, and international development. She is the associate editor of Natural Hazards Review. She has published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, International Review of Public Administration, Policy Sciences, and Ecology and Society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Review of Public Administration
International Review of Public Administration Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The International Review of Public Administration (ISSN 1229-4659) is published biannually by the Korean Association for Public Administration (KAPA) to provide a worldwide audience with the opportunity for communication and further understanding on issues of public administration and policy. There will be a triple-blind peer review process for all submissions of articles of general interest. There are no particular limitations on subject areas as long as they are related to the field of public administration and policy or deal with public employees. Articles should be analytic and demonstrate the highest standards of excellence in conceptualization, craftsmanship, and methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信