“一带一路”地缘经济模拟与南亚地区安全综合体

IF 0.4 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Ambrish Dhaka
{"title":"“一带一路”地缘经济模拟与南亚地区安全综合体","authors":"Ambrish Dhaka","doi":"10.1080/10402659.2023.2268040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe Belt and Road Initiative rattled the South Asian security environment vigorously as it involved strong territorial sensitivities of India, which found itself engaged on two fronts with Pakistan and China. The BRI has been the geoeconomic drive projecting China’s peaceful rise. It has been welcomed with hope and suspicion as Western powers are equally interested in containing China in the Asian order. This paper examines BRI as a source of external transformation to the regional security complex model devised by Buzan. South Asia’s inadequacies in bringing internal transformation, as envisioned by Buzan, allow the BRI to be a source of cold peace in the region. The BRI looks at decentered region-building with an appeal of great power overlay. This tier is relevant in diluting the South Asia geopolitical polarities. The paper claims that BRI influences South Asian geopolitics, where India and Pakistan are no longer locked into bipolarities. The smaller states are bandwagoning with China, and that calibrates the South Asian regional security complex. The cold peace laced with geoeconomic transformation can render a regional transformation to the security complex such that the South Asian regional security complex might dissipate into two or more mini-complexes. DISCLOSURE STATEMENTThe author reports that there are no competing interests to declare.Additional informationNotes on contributorsAmbrish DhakaAmbrish Dhaka is a faculty for Afghanistan Studies in the School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He was a Visiting Professor of South Asian Studies at Fudan University, Shanghai, China, during March-April 2012. He did his Masters in Geography with a specialization in Political Geography. He gives Masters and PhD courses on South Asia and Afghanistan Studies at the SIS, JNU, namely, 1. Geopolitics of Afghanistan, and 2. Ethnicity, religion and politics of Afghanistan. He also gives the PhD scholars a specialized technical course on GIS for Area Studies. He has about 24 years of teaching experience. He has supervised 15 PhDs and 26 Mphils successfully. His areas of interest/specialization are 1. Political Geography, 2. Geopolitics, 3. International Relations, 3. Area Studies in South Asia, Central Asia, Eurasia and Afghanistan, 4. Energy Studies. He is an Information Technology enthusiast specializing in GIS software, Python and R Programming languages. He has developed a methodological approach to Social Media Analytics and Data Analytics in IR. He has nearly 20 years of exposure to Linux platforms. He has published 24 papers, 16 chapters, and a book to his credit. His publications are available on Academia.edu. E-mail: ambijat@gmail.com","PeriodicalId":51831,"journal":{"name":"Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Geoeconomic Simulacrum of BRI and the South Asian Regional Security Complex\",\"authors\":\"Ambrish Dhaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10402659.2023.2268040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThe Belt and Road Initiative rattled the South Asian security environment vigorously as it involved strong territorial sensitivities of India, which found itself engaged on two fronts with Pakistan and China. The BRI has been the geoeconomic drive projecting China’s peaceful rise. It has been welcomed with hope and suspicion as Western powers are equally interested in containing China in the Asian order. This paper examines BRI as a source of external transformation to the regional security complex model devised by Buzan. South Asia’s inadequacies in bringing internal transformation, as envisioned by Buzan, allow the BRI to be a source of cold peace in the region. The BRI looks at decentered region-building with an appeal of great power overlay. This tier is relevant in diluting the South Asia geopolitical polarities. The paper claims that BRI influences South Asian geopolitics, where India and Pakistan are no longer locked into bipolarities. The smaller states are bandwagoning with China, and that calibrates the South Asian regional security complex. The cold peace laced with geoeconomic transformation can render a regional transformation to the security complex such that the South Asian regional security complex might dissipate into two or more mini-complexes. DISCLOSURE STATEMENTThe author reports that there are no competing interests to declare.Additional informationNotes on contributorsAmbrish DhakaAmbrish Dhaka is a faculty for Afghanistan Studies in the School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He was a Visiting Professor of South Asian Studies at Fudan University, Shanghai, China, during March-April 2012. He did his Masters in Geography with a specialization in Political Geography. He gives Masters and PhD courses on South Asia and Afghanistan Studies at the SIS, JNU, namely, 1. Geopolitics of Afghanistan, and 2. Ethnicity, religion and politics of Afghanistan. He also gives the PhD scholars a specialized technical course on GIS for Area Studies. He has about 24 years of teaching experience. He has supervised 15 PhDs and 26 Mphils successfully. His areas of interest/specialization are 1. Political Geography, 2. Geopolitics, 3. International Relations, 3. Area Studies in South Asia, Central Asia, Eurasia and Afghanistan, 4. Energy Studies. He is an Information Technology enthusiast specializing in GIS software, Python and R Programming languages. He has developed a methodological approach to Social Media Analytics and Data Analytics in IR. He has nearly 20 years of exposure to Linux platforms. He has published 24 papers, 16 chapters, and a book to his credit. His publications are available on Academia.edu. E-mail: ambijat@gmail.com\",\"PeriodicalId\":51831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2023.2268040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2023.2268040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要“一带一路”倡议引起了南亚安全环境的强烈不安,因为它涉及印度强烈的领土敏感性,印度发现自己与巴基斯坦和中国在两条战线上交战。“一带一路”是中国和平崛起的地缘经济动力。由于西方列强同样对在亚洲秩序中遏制中国感兴趣,它受到了希望和怀疑的欢迎。本文将“一带一路”作为布赞设计的区域安全综合体模型的外部转型来源。正如布赞所设想的那样,南亚在实现内部转型方面的不足,使“一带一路”成为该地区冷和平的源泉。“一带一路”着眼于去中心化的区域建设,具有大国叠加的吸引力。这一层在淡化南亚地缘政治两极分化方面是相关的。该论文声称,“一带一路”影响着南亚的地缘政治,在那里,印度和巴基斯坦不再陷入两极分化。较小的国家正与中国为伍,这调整了南亚地区的安全格局。与地缘经济转型相结合的冷和平可能导致安全综合体的区域转型,从而使南亚区域安全综合体可能消散为两个或更多个微型综合体。披露声明作者报告无竞争利益需要申报。sambrish Dhaka是新德里贾瓦哈拉尔·尼赫鲁大学国际关系学院阿富汗研究专业的教员。2012年3月至4月,他在中国上海复旦大学担任南亚研究客座教授。他获得了地理学硕士学位,主修政治地理学。他在南亚和阿富汗研究中心开设硕士和博士课程。2.阿富汗的地缘政治;阿富汗的种族,宗教和政治。他还为博士学者开设了地理信息系统区域研究专业技术课程。他有大约24年的教学经验。他成功地指导了15名博士和26名硕士。他的兴趣/专业领域是1。政治地理,2;地缘政治,3。国际关系,3。南亚、中亚、欧亚和阿富汗的区域研究,第4期。能源研究。他是一名信息技术爱好者,擅长GIS软件、Python和R编程语言。他为IR中的社交媒体分析和数据分析开发了方法论方法。他接触Linux平台已有近20年。他已经发表了24篇论文,16章,并出版了一本书。他的出版物可以在Academia.edu上找到。电子邮件:ambijat@gmail.com
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Geoeconomic Simulacrum of BRI and the South Asian Regional Security Complex
AbstractThe Belt and Road Initiative rattled the South Asian security environment vigorously as it involved strong territorial sensitivities of India, which found itself engaged on two fronts with Pakistan and China. The BRI has been the geoeconomic drive projecting China’s peaceful rise. It has been welcomed with hope and suspicion as Western powers are equally interested in containing China in the Asian order. This paper examines BRI as a source of external transformation to the regional security complex model devised by Buzan. South Asia’s inadequacies in bringing internal transformation, as envisioned by Buzan, allow the BRI to be a source of cold peace in the region. The BRI looks at decentered region-building with an appeal of great power overlay. This tier is relevant in diluting the South Asia geopolitical polarities. The paper claims that BRI influences South Asian geopolitics, where India and Pakistan are no longer locked into bipolarities. The smaller states are bandwagoning with China, and that calibrates the South Asian regional security complex. The cold peace laced with geoeconomic transformation can render a regional transformation to the security complex such that the South Asian regional security complex might dissipate into two or more mini-complexes. DISCLOSURE STATEMENTThe author reports that there are no competing interests to declare.Additional informationNotes on contributorsAmbrish DhakaAmbrish Dhaka is a faculty for Afghanistan Studies in the School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He was a Visiting Professor of South Asian Studies at Fudan University, Shanghai, China, during March-April 2012. He did his Masters in Geography with a specialization in Political Geography. He gives Masters and PhD courses on South Asia and Afghanistan Studies at the SIS, JNU, namely, 1. Geopolitics of Afghanistan, and 2. Ethnicity, religion and politics of Afghanistan. He also gives the PhD scholars a specialized technical course on GIS for Area Studies. He has about 24 years of teaching experience. He has supervised 15 PhDs and 26 Mphils successfully. His areas of interest/specialization are 1. Political Geography, 2. Geopolitics, 3. International Relations, 3. Area Studies in South Asia, Central Asia, Eurasia and Afghanistan, 4. Energy Studies. He is an Information Technology enthusiast specializing in GIS software, Python and R Programming languages. He has developed a methodological approach to Social Media Analytics and Data Analytics in IR. He has nearly 20 years of exposure to Linux platforms. He has published 24 papers, 16 chapters, and a book to his credit. His publications are available on Academia.edu. E-mail: ambijat@gmail.com
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice
Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信