全计数与谐波计数对多作者导向研究领域研究者排名差异的影响

Q3 Social Sciences

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1002/pra2.898

Tung‐Wen Cheng, Yu‐Wei Chang

{"title":"全计数与谐波计数对多作者导向研究领域研究者排名差异的影响","authors":"Tung‐Wen Cheng, Yu‐Wei Chang","doi":"10.1002/pra2.898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study explored whether harmonic counting, which emphasizes the position and role of authors in the author byline, produces researcher rankings (based on the number of articles published) that differ from those produced through full counting in multiple authorship–oriented research fields. An analysis of articles published during a 10‐year period (2012–2021) by 377 chemical engineering professors or associate professors revealed a significant and positive correlation between full counting rankings and harmonic counting rankings. This finding indicates that when multiple authorship is the predominant trend for researchers within a given field, full counting can be performed to quickly determine researcher productivity rankings because it is more straightforward than harmonic counting. Future research should explore other research fields with diverse publishing trends.","PeriodicalId":37833,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Researcher Rankings in Multiple Authorship–Oriented Research Fields Determined by Full Counting and Harmonic Counting\",\"authors\":\"Tung‐Wen Cheng, Yu‐Wei Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pra2.898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study explored whether harmonic counting, which emphasizes the position and role of authors in the author byline, produces researcher rankings (based on the number of articles published) that differ from those produced through full counting in multiple authorship–oriented research fields. An analysis of articles published during a 10‐year period (2012–2021) by 377 chemical engineering professors or associate professors revealed a significant and positive correlation between full counting rankings and harmonic counting rankings. This finding indicates that when multiple authorship is the predominant trend for researchers within a given field, full counting can be performed to quickly determine researcher productivity rankings because it is more straightforward than harmonic counting. Future research should explore other research fields with diverse publishing trends.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.898\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究探讨了谐波计数(谐波计数强调作者在作者署名中的地位和作用)是否会导致研究者排名(基于发表文章的数量)与在多个以作者身份为导向的研究领域中通过完全计数产生的排名不同。对377名化学工程教授或副教授在10年(2012-2021)期间发表的文章进行的分析显示，全计数排名和谐波计数排名之间存在显著的正相关关系。这一发现表明，当多个作者是给定领域内研究人员的主要趋势时，可以执行完整计数来快速确定研究人员的生产力排名，因为它比谐波计数更直接。未来的研究应探索其他具有不同出版趋势的研究领域。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Differences in Researcher Rankings in Multiple Authorship–Oriented Research Fields Determined by Full Counting and Harmonic Counting

ABSTRACT This study explored whether harmonic counting, which emphasizes the position and role of authors in the author byline, produces researcher rankings (based on the number of articles published) that differ from those produced through full counting in multiple authorship–oriented research fields. An analysis of articles published during a 10‐year period (2012–2021) by 377 chemical engineering professors or associate professors revealed a significant and positive correlation between full counting rankings and harmonic counting rankings. This finding indicates that when multiple authorship is the predominant trend for researchers within a given field, full counting can be performed to quickly determine researcher productivity rankings because it is more straightforward than harmonic counting. Future research should explore other research fields with diverse publishing trends.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

164

期刊介绍： Information not localized