低收入和中等收入国家预防和控制非传染性疾病的护士主导干预措施:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
GK Mini
{"title":"低收入和中等收入国家预防和控制非传染性疾病的护士主导干预措施:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"GK Mini","doi":"10.4103/jncd.jncd_36_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To the Editor, We read with pleasure the article by Kavita et al. “Nurse-led interventions for prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis”[1] and would like to appreciate the efforts done by the authors in addressing the nurse-based interventions on noncommunicable disease prevention. However, we would like to seek your attention to the missing studies on nurse-led intervention for noncommunicable disease prevention in India. Our earlier study on the effectiveness of a school-based educational intervention to improve hypertension control among school teachers in Kerala state of India[2] evaluated the effects of a nurse-facilitated educational intervention in improving hypertension control rate. The study concluded that the nurse-facilitated educational intervention was effective in improving the control and treatment rates of hypertension and reducing systolic blood pressure. However, there was no information on the above study in the systematic review and meta-analysis by Kavita et al.[1] The reason for the authors’ exclusion of these types of publications is not clear. Moreover, the above article is an open-access, and the role of nurses in the intervention can be clearly distinguished. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.","PeriodicalId":52935,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Noncommunicable Diseases","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurse-led interventions for prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"GK Mini\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jncd.jncd_36_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To the Editor, We read with pleasure the article by Kavita et al. “Nurse-led interventions for prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis”[1] and would like to appreciate the efforts done by the authors in addressing the nurse-based interventions on noncommunicable disease prevention. However, we would like to seek your attention to the missing studies on nurse-led intervention for noncommunicable disease prevention in India. Our earlier study on the effectiveness of a school-based educational intervention to improve hypertension control among school teachers in Kerala state of India[2] evaluated the effects of a nurse-facilitated educational intervention in improving hypertension control rate. The study concluded that the nurse-facilitated educational intervention was effective in improving the control and treatment rates of hypertension and reducing systolic blood pressure. However, there was no information on the above study in the systematic review and meta-analysis by Kavita et al.[1] The reason for the authors’ exclusion of these types of publications is not clear. Moreover, the above article is an open-access, and the role of nurses in the intervention can be clearly distinguished. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Noncommunicable Diseases\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Noncommunicable Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jncd.jncd_36_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Noncommunicable Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jncd.jncd_36_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

致编辑:我们愉快地阅读了Kavita等人的文章《低收入和中等收入国家护士主导的非传染性疾病预防和控制干预措施:系统回顾和荟萃分析》[1],并感谢作者在解决以护士为基础的非传染性疾病预防干预方面所做的努力。然而,我们想请您关注印度关于护士主导的非传染性疾病预防干预的缺失研究。我们早期对印度喀拉拉邦学校教师以学校为基础的教育干预改善高血压控制率的有效性的研究b[2]评估了护士促进的教育干预在改善高血压控制率方面的效果。结果表明,护士辅助教育干预对提高高血压的控制率和治愈率,降低收缩压是有效的。然而,Kavita等人的系统评价和meta分析中均未发现上述研究的相关信息。[1]作者排除这些类型的出版物的原因尚不清楚。而且,上述文章是开放获取的,护士在干预中的作用可以明确区分。财政支持及赞助无。利益冲突没有利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nurse-led interventions for prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis
To the Editor, We read with pleasure the article by Kavita et al. “Nurse-led interventions for prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis”[1] and would like to appreciate the efforts done by the authors in addressing the nurse-based interventions on noncommunicable disease prevention. However, we would like to seek your attention to the missing studies on nurse-led intervention for noncommunicable disease prevention in India. Our earlier study on the effectiveness of a school-based educational intervention to improve hypertension control among school teachers in Kerala state of India[2] evaluated the effects of a nurse-facilitated educational intervention in improving hypertension control rate. The study concluded that the nurse-facilitated educational intervention was effective in improving the control and treatment rates of hypertension and reducing systolic blood pressure. However, there was no information on the above study in the systematic review and meta-analysis by Kavita et al.[1] The reason for the authors’ exclusion of these types of publications is not clear. Moreover, the above article is an open-access, and the role of nurses in the intervention can be clearly distinguished. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信