schiotz压痕与goldmann压痕眼压计测量眼压的横断面比较研究

StutiV Juneja, Tanima Bansal, Isha Gandhi, Moninder Bhati
{"title":"schiotz压痕与goldmann压痕眼压计测量眼压的横断面比较研究","authors":"StutiV Juneja, Tanima Bansal, Isha Gandhi, Moninder Bhati","doi":"10.4103/tjosr.tjosr_40_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This cross-sectional study was aimed to compare Schiotz indentation tonometer (ST) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) readings (in different ranges of IOP) in general population and also to determine the reliability of ST as a tool for mass screening of glaucoma. Material and Methods: This study was conducted on 200 patients who attended the OPD of Ophthalmology in tertiary centre of central Gujarat. The selected population was subjected to detailed anterior segment examination, ocular fundus for optic nerve head and objective determination of IOP of two eyes of the patients. Results: In our study, both GAT and ST showed no statistical difference in IOP between males and females. IOP increased with age. There was no statistical difference between GAT and ST in measuring IOP in range of 7-15 mmHg but ST overestimated GAT in pressure range of 7-15 mmHg. ST underestimated GAT in pressure range of 16-25 mmHg, there was significant difference between GAT and ST in measuring IOP in range of 16-25 mmHg.ST underestimated GAT in IOP reading above 26 mm Hg. Conclusion: In glaucoma screening where we want to detect minor difference between the high normal and abnormal IOP, measurement with ST would be rendered ineffective and it is therefore wise to re-estimate the IOP with GAT and also repeat reading with different weights of ST. But ST being an affordable, easy to maintain, and portable instrument can be used as mass screening tool for glaucoma though at borderline tension between 17 to 23 mmHg it is wise to re-estimate IOP with GAT.","PeriodicalId":34180,"journal":{"name":"TNOA Journal of Ophthalmic Science and Research","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by schiotz indentation and goldmann applanation tonometer: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"StutiV Juneja, Tanima Bansal, Isha Gandhi, Moninder Bhati\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/tjosr.tjosr_40_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: This cross-sectional study was aimed to compare Schiotz indentation tonometer (ST) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) readings (in different ranges of IOP) in general population and also to determine the reliability of ST as a tool for mass screening of glaucoma. Material and Methods: This study was conducted on 200 patients who attended the OPD of Ophthalmology in tertiary centre of central Gujarat. The selected population was subjected to detailed anterior segment examination, ocular fundus for optic nerve head and objective determination of IOP of two eyes of the patients. Results: In our study, both GAT and ST showed no statistical difference in IOP between males and females. IOP increased with age. There was no statistical difference between GAT and ST in measuring IOP in range of 7-15 mmHg but ST overestimated GAT in pressure range of 7-15 mmHg. ST underestimated GAT in pressure range of 16-25 mmHg, there was significant difference between GAT and ST in measuring IOP in range of 16-25 mmHg.ST underestimated GAT in IOP reading above 26 mm Hg. Conclusion: In glaucoma screening where we want to detect minor difference between the high normal and abnormal IOP, measurement with ST would be rendered ineffective and it is therefore wise to re-estimate the IOP with GAT and also repeat reading with different weights of ST. But ST being an affordable, easy to maintain, and portable instrument can be used as mass screening tool for glaucoma though at borderline tension between 17 to 23 mmHg it is wise to re-estimate IOP with GAT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TNOA Journal of Ophthalmic Science and Research\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TNOA Journal of Ophthalmic Science and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjosr.tjosr_40_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TNOA Journal of Ophthalmic Science and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjosr.tjosr_40_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本横断面研究旨在比较普通人群中(不同眼压范围)Schiotz压痕眼压计(ST)和Goldmann压痕眼压计(GAT)的读数,并确定ST作为青光眼大规模筛查工具的可靠性。材料和方法:本研究对古吉拉特邦中部三级中心眼科门诊就诊的200例患者进行了研究。选择的人群进行详细的前节检查、视神经头眼底检查和两眼IOP的客观测定。结果:在我们的研究中,GAT和ST的IOP在男女之间没有统计学差异。眼压随年龄增长而增加。GAT和ST在7 ~ 15 mmHg范围内测量IOP无统计学差异,但ST在7 ~ 15 mmHg压力范围内高估了GAT。ST在16-25 mmHg血压范围内低估了GAT, GAT和ST在16-25 mmHg血压范围内测量IOP有显著差异。ST在IOP高于26 mm Hg时低估了GAT。青光眼筛查,我们想要发现小调区别正常和不正常眼压高,测量与圣会呈现无效,因此明智的重新评估的IOP手枪也重复阅读不同权重的圣圣是一个负担得起的,但易于维护、质量和便携式仪器可以作为筛选工具青光眼虽然在边缘之间的紧张关系17到23毫米汞柱是明智的重新评估与手枪眼压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by schiotz indentation and goldmann applanation tonometer: A cross-sectional study
Aim: This cross-sectional study was aimed to compare Schiotz indentation tonometer (ST) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) readings (in different ranges of IOP) in general population and also to determine the reliability of ST as a tool for mass screening of glaucoma. Material and Methods: This study was conducted on 200 patients who attended the OPD of Ophthalmology in tertiary centre of central Gujarat. The selected population was subjected to detailed anterior segment examination, ocular fundus for optic nerve head and objective determination of IOP of two eyes of the patients. Results: In our study, both GAT and ST showed no statistical difference in IOP between males and females. IOP increased with age. There was no statistical difference between GAT and ST in measuring IOP in range of 7-15 mmHg but ST overestimated GAT in pressure range of 7-15 mmHg. ST underestimated GAT in pressure range of 16-25 mmHg, there was significant difference between GAT and ST in measuring IOP in range of 16-25 mmHg.ST underestimated GAT in IOP reading above 26 mm Hg. Conclusion: In glaucoma screening where we want to detect minor difference between the high normal and abnormal IOP, measurement with ST would be rendered ineffective and it is therefore wise to re-estimate the IOP with GAT and also repeat reading with different weights of ST. But ST being an affordable, easy to maintain, and portable instrument can be used as mass screening tool for glaucoma though at borderline tension between 17 to 23 mmHg it is wise to re-estimate IOP with GAT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信