编者注

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES
Kimberly M. Jew, Wanda S. Pillow, Darius Bost
{"title":"编者注","authors":"Kimberly M. Jew, Wanda S. Pillow, Darius Bost","doi":"10.1353/fro.2023.a902523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Editors’ Note Kimberly M. Jew, Wanda S. Pillow, and Darius Bost A little over twenty years ago, the Carnegie Museum of Art in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, presented “Panopticon: An Art Spectacular.” This newsworthy exhibit featured an array of art pieces designed to attract and surprise the patrons’ all-seeing eyes, with paintings, sculptures, and decorative arts chairs arranged everywhere—from floor-to-ceiling, in non-traditional visual patterns. The essence of a Frontiers general volume embraces the dynamism and immediacy of the artistic panopticon, inviting readers to experience a diversity of feminist and gendered-centered methods, theories, and forms of expression. The essays in this volume demonstrate the discursive nature of women’s and gender studies, revealing the multiple and interactive layers of inquiry by which feminist scholarship emerges. Just as an ink rendering might speak to a designer chair, which also speaks to an abstract sculpture, these diverse essays engage in the critical conversations that define today’s past and emerging models of feminist scholarship. Of note, these essays further contribute to a darker Foucauldian interpretation of the panopticon as a tool of pervasive institutional power and surveillance. Though diverse in scope, these texts are firmly united in their commitment to exposing societal inequities and forms of intersectional oppression. They ask us to not only see everything but to see critically. This general volume is divided among three sections. The first section explores Audre Lorde’s groundbreaking work on Black, lesbian, and women’s studies through the lens of labor. The practice of labor manifests in multiple forms, including paid or unpaid, domestic or worldly, emotionally felt or object-driven, local or world changing. The two essays on Lorde’s work explore how contrasting forms of labor thread through women’s lives and experiences. In “Audre Lorde, Labor Theorist: Rethinking Integrity within Late Capitalism,” Kristina Popiel approaches Audre Lorde’s scholarship and writings through the framework of labor theory. She argues that Lorde viewed the social construction of “woman” as intimately connected to work, which [End Page xi] potential leads to “a radical notion of wholeness that is based in the fullness of women’s labor (often social justice labor).” In “Metabolize Hate or Die of It: Lorde, Labor, and Critical Affect Theory,” Molly Benitez explores affect theory in light of the physical experiences and legacies of women and queer identities of color. This essay seeks to put Lorde’s theory of metabolization “in conversation with Judith Butler’s theory of performativity to analyze ‘the affects of labor’—the stress, trauma, and emotions.” Benitez offers a critique of capitalism’s oppressive methods, demonstrating how marginalized subjects are forced to meet capitalism’s demands. The second section of this volume presents two essays that focus on global feminist critiques, suggesting an expansive, and yet connective, vision of feminist conversations beyond the United States. In “Domestic Touchpoints between British and Chinese Women’s Art,” Virginia Yiqing Yang and Adrienne Evans extend the conversation about women’s lives, domesticity, and labor by seeking transcultural “touchpoints” among British and Chinese artists. The authors focus their comparative examination on how artists have approached “women’s work” through creative explorations of distraction, time, absurdity, and ordinariness. In “Gadji Feminism(s) in Serbia: Racial Privilege and ‘Intersectional’ Solidarity in an Eastern European Semiperiphery,” Ivana Pražić and Ana Vilenica discuss the work of Jelena Savić, who they note as “the only Romani critical race theoretician, poet, and decolonial activist in Serbia,” one who calls “for unpacking the colonial legacy and whiteness behind the feminist politics.” In their essay, they detail Savić’s sharp critique of gadji (non-Roma and conciliatory Roma) feminism and its savior approach to Roma women, an approach that typically ignores the legacy of racism and sexism that faces their community. The third section of this volume expands upon feminist concepts of time, imaginaries, women’s politics, and reproductive rights. First, in “Specter(s) of Care: A Symposium on Midwifery, Relationality, and Reproductive Justice To-Come,” Rodante van der Waal offers readers the opportunity to consider how the Platonic symposium and the legacy of Socrates’ mother’s labor as a midwife combine to house a dramatic commentary on midwives and the lack of relational...","PeriodicalId":46007,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers-A Journal of Women Studies","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editors’ Note\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly M. Jew, Wanda S. Pillow, Darius Bost\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/fro.2023.a902523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Editors’ Note Kimberly M. Jew, Wanda S. Pillow, and Darius Bost A little over twenty years ago, the Carnegie Museum of Art in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, presented “Panopticon: An Art Spectacular.” This newsworthy exhibit featured an array of art pieces designed to attract and surprise the patrons’ all-seeing eyes, with paintings, sculptures, and decorative arts chairs arranged everywhere—from floor-to-ceiling, in non-traditional visual patterns. The essence of a Frontiers general volume embraces the dynamism and immediacy of the artistic panopticon, inviting readers to experience a diversity of feminist and gendered-centered methods, theories, and forms of expression. The essays in this volume demonstrate the discursive nature of women’s and gender studies, revealing the multiple and interactive layers of inquiry by which feminist scholarship emerges. Just as an ink rendering might speak to a designer chair, which also speaks to an abstract sculpture, these diverse essays engage in the critical conversations that define today’s past and emerging models of feminist scholarship. Of note, these essays further contribute to a darker Foucauldian interpretation of the panopticon as a tool of pervasive institutional power and surveillance. Though diverse in scope, these texts are firmly united in their commitment to exposing societal inequities and forms of intersectional oppression. They ask us to not only see everything but to see critically. This general volume is divided among three sections. The first section explores Audre Lorde’s groundbreaking work on Black, lesbian, and women’s studies through the lens of labor. The practice of labor manifests in multiple forms, including paid or unpaid, domestic or worldly, emotionally felt or object-driven, local or world changing. The two essays on Lorde’s work explore how contrasting forms of labor thread through women’s lives and experiences. In “Audre Lorde, Labor Theorist: Rethinking Integrity within Late Capitalism,” Kristina Popiel approaches Audre Lorde’s scholarship and writings through the framework of labor theory. She argues that Lorde viewed the social construction of “woman” as intimately connected to work, which [End Page xi] potential leads to “a radical notion of wholeness that is based in the fullness of women’s labor (often social justice labor).” In “Metabolize Hate or Die of It: Lorde, Labor, and Critical Affect Theory,” Molly Benitez explores affect theory in light of the physical experiences and legacies of women and queer identities of color. This essay seeks to put Lorde’s theory of metabolization “in conversation with Judith Butler’s theory of performativity to analyze ‘the affects of labor’—the stress, trauma, and emotions.” Benitez offers a critique of capitalism’s oppressive methods, demonstrating how marginalized subjects are forced to meet capitalism’s demands. The second section of this volume presents two essays that focus on global feminist critiques, suggesting an expansive, and yet connective, vision of feminist conversations beyond the United States. In “Domestic Touchpoints between British and Chinese Women’s Art,” Virginia Yiqing Yang and Adrienne Evans extend the conversation about women’s lives, domesticity, and labor by seeking transcultural “touchpoints” among British and Chinese artists. The authors focus their comparative examination on how artists have approached “women’s work” through creative explorations of distraction, time, absurdity, and ordinariness. In “Gadji Feminism(s) in Serbia: Racial Privilege and ‘Intersectional’ Solidarity in an Eastern European Semiperiphery,” Ivana Pražić and Ana Vilenica discuss the work of Jelena Savić, who they note as “the only Romani critical race theoretician, poet, and decolonial activist in Serbia,” one who calls “for unpacking the colonial legacy and whiteness behind the feminist politics.” In their essay, they detail Savić’s sharp critique of gadji (non-Roma and conciliatory Roma) feminism and its savior approach to Roma women, an approach that typically ignores the legacy of racism and sexism that faces their community. The third section of this volume expands upon feminist concepts of time, imaginaries, women’s politics, and reproductive rights. First, in “Specter(s) of Care: A Symposium on Midwifery, Relationality, and Reproductive Justice To-Come,” Rodante van der Waal offers readers the opportunity to consider how the Platonic symposium and the legacy of Socrates’ mother’s labor as a midwife combine to house a dramatic commentary on midwives and the lack of relational...\",\"PeriodicalId\":46007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers-A Journal of Women Studies\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers-A Journal of Women Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/fro.2023.a902523\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers-A Journal of Women Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/fro.2023.a902523","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

编辑注:金伯利M. Jew, Wanda S. Pillow和Darius Bost二十多年前,宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡的卡内基艺术博物馆展出了“圆形监狱:一场艺术奇观”。这个具有新闻价值的展览展示了一系列旨在吸引和惊喜顾客的艺术作品,从地板到天花板,以非传统的视觉模式排列着绘画,雕塑和装饰艺术椅子。前沿一般卷的本质包含了艺术全景监狱的活力和即时性,邀请读者体验女权主义和以性别为中心的方法,理论和表达形式的多样性。本卷中的文章展示了女性和性别研究的话语性质,揭示了女权主义奖学金出现的多重和互动层次。就像水墨渲染可以与设计师椅子对话,也可以与抽象雕塑对话一样,这些不同的文章参与了批判性的对话,这些对话定义了今天的过去和新兴的女权主义学术模式。值得注意的是,这些文章进一步促成了福柯式的更黑暗的解释,即圆形监狱是无处不在的机构权力和监视的工具。虽然这些文本的范围各不相同,但它们坚定地一致致力于揭露社会不平等和各种形式的交叉压迫。他们要求我们不仅要看一切,而且要批判地看。这本总卷分为三个部分。第一部分通过劳动的视角探讨奥德丽·洛德在黑人、女同性恋和女性研究方面的开创性工作。劳动实践表现为多种形式,包括有偿或无偿,家庭或世俗,情感感受或对象驱动,地方或世界变化。这两篇关于洛德作品的文章探讨了不同形式的劳动如何贯穿女性的生活和经历。在《劳动理论家奥德丽·洛德:重新思考晚期资本主义的完整性》一书中,克里斯蒂娜·波皮尔通过劳动理论的框架来探讨奥德丽·洛德的学术成就和著作。她认为,洛德认为“女性”的社会建构与工作密切相关,这可能导致“一种基于女性劳动(通常是社会正义劳动)的完整性的激进概念”。在《代谢仇恨或为此而死:洛德、劳动和批判性情感理论》一书中,莫莉·贝尼特斯(Molly Benitez)从女性的身体经历和遗产以及有色人种的酷儿身份出发,探讨了情感理论。这篇文章试图将洛德的新陈代谢理论“与朱迪思·巴特勒的表演性理论进行对话,以分析‘劳动的影响’——压力、创伤和情绪。”贝尼特斯对资本主义的压迫方式进行了批判,展示了边缘化的主体是如何被迫满足资本主义的要求的。本卷的第二部分介绍了两篇关注全球女权主义批评的文章,提出了一种广泛的、但又相互联系的、超越美国的女权主义对话的视野。在“英国和中国女性艺术的家庭接触点”中,杨奕清和艾德丽安·埃文斯通过在英国和中国艺术家中寻找跨文化的“接触点”,扩展了关于女性生活、家庭生活和劳动的对话。作者将他们的比较研究集中在艺术家如何通过对分心、时间、荒谬和平凡的创造性探索来接近“女性作品”。在“塞尔维亚的Gadji女权主义:东欧半边缘地区的种族特权和“跨部门”团结”一文中,Ivana Pražić和Ana Vilenica讨论了耶莱娜·萨维奇的作品,她们认为耶莱娜·萨维奇是“塞尔维亚唯一的罗姆批判种族理论家、诗人和非殖民化活动家”,她呼吁“拆解女权主义政治背后的殖民遗产和白人”。在他们的文章中,他们详细描述了萨维维奇对gadji(非罗姆人和和解的罗姆人)女权主义的尖锐批评,以及它对罗姆妇女的拯救方法,这种方法通常忽略了他们社区面临的种族主义和性别歧视的遗产。本卷的第三部分扩展了时间,想象,妇女政治和生殖权利的女权主义概念。首先,在《关怀的幽灵:关于助产、关系和生育正义的研讨会》一书中,罗丹特·范德瓦尔为读者提供了一个机会,让他们思考柏拉图式的研讨会和苏格拉底母亲作为助产士的劳动遗产如何结合起来,对助产士和缺乏关系进行了戏剧性的评论……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editors’ Note
Editors’ Note Kimberly M. Jew, Wanda S. Pillow, and Darius Bost A little over twenty years ago, the Carnegie Museum of Art in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, presented “Panopticon: An Art Spectacular.” This newsworthy exhibit featured an array of art pieces designed to attract and surprise the patrons’ all-seeing eyes, with paintings, sculptures, and decorative arts chairs arranged everywhere—from floor-to-ceiling, in non-traditional visual patterns. The essence of a Frontiers general volume embraces the dynamism and immediacy of the artistic panopticon, inviting readers to experience a diversity of feminist and gendered-centered methods, theories, and forms of expression. The essays in this volume demonstrate the discursive nature of women’s and gender studies, revealing the multiple and interactive layers of inquiry by which feminist scholarship emerges. Just as an ink rendering might speak to a designer chair, which also speaks to an abstract sculpture, these diverse essays engage in the critical conversations that define today’s past and emerging models of feminist scholarship. Of note, these essays further contribute to a darker Foucauldian interpretation of the panopticon as a tool of pervasive institutional power and surveillance. Though diverse in scope, these texts are firmly united in their commitment to exposing societal inequities and forms of intersectional oppression. They ask us to not only see everything but to see critically. This general volume is divided among three sections. The first section explores Audre Lorde’s groundbreaking work on Black, lesbian, and women’s studies through the lens of labor. The practice of labor manifests in multiple forms, including paid or unpaid, domestic or worldly, emotionally felt or object-driven, local or world changing. The two essays on Lorde’s work explore how contrasting forms of labor thread through women’s lives and experiences. In “Audre Lorde, Labor Theorist: Rethinking Integrity within Late Capitalism,” Kristina Popiel approaches Audre Lorde’s scholarship and writings through the framework of labor theory. She argues that Lorde viewed the social construction of “woman” as intimately connected to work, which [End Page xi] potential leads to “a radical notion of wholeness that is based in the fullness of women’s labor (often social justice labor).” In “Metabolize Hate or Die of It: Lorde, Labor, and Critical Affect Theory,” Molly Benitez explores affect theory in light of the physical experiences and legacies of women and queer identities of color. This essay seeks to put Lorde’s theory of metabolization “in conversation with Judith Butler’s theory of performativity to analyze ‘the affects of labor’—the stress, trauma, and emotions.” Benitez offers a critique of capitalism’s oppressive methods, demonstrating how marginalized subjects are forced to meet capitalism’s demands. The second section of this volume presents two essays that focus on global feminist critiques, suggesting an expansive, and yet connective, vision of feminist conversations beyond the United States. In “Domestic Touchpoints between British and Chinese Women’s Art,” Virginia Yiqing Yang and Adrienne Evans extend the conversation about women’s lives, domesticity, and labor by seeking transcultural “touchpoints” among British and Chinese artists. The authors focus their comparative examination on how artists have approached “women’s work” through creative explorations of distraction, time, absurdity, and ordinariness. In “Gadji Feminism(s) in Serbia: Racial Privilege and ‘Intersectional’ Solidarity in an Eastern European Semiperiphery,” Ivana Pražić and Ana Vilenica discuss the work of Jelena Savić, who they note as “the only Romani critical race theoretician, poet, and decolonial activist in Serbia,” one who calls “for unpacking the colonial legacy and whiteness behind the feminist politics.” In their essay, they detail Savić’s sharp critique of gadji (non-Roma and conciliatory Roma) feminism and its savior approach to Roma women, an approach that typically ignores the legacy of racism and sexism that faces their community. The third section of this volume expands upon feminist concepts of time, imaginaries, women’s politics, and reproductive rights. First, in “Specter(s) of Care: A Symposium on Midwifery, Relationality, and Reproductive Justice To-Come,” Rodante van der Waal offers readers the opportunity to consider how the Platonic symposium and the legacy of Socrates’ mother’s labor as a midwife combine to house a dramatic commentary on midwives and the lack of relational...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信