害羞的被调查者和参与调查的倾向:一项概念验证研究

John Boyle, James Dayton, Randy ZuWallack, Ronaldo Iachan
{"title":"害羞的被调查者和参与调查的倾向:一项概念验证研究","authors":"John Boyle, James Dayton, Randy ZuWallack, Ronaldo Iachan","doi":"10.29115/sp-2014-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Democratic presidential support among voters was overstated in 88% of national polls in 2016 and 93% in 2020. The \"shy voter\" phenomenon from British electoral politics was one explanation offered in the 2016 elections. Although a similar pattern occurred in 2020 election polls, the evidence does not support misrepresentation of voting intent by Trump supporters as the explanation. However, an alternative hypothesis of a self-selection bias against Trump voters in pre-election surveys has been proposed. Moreover, if these Trump voters were less likely to participate in surveys due to a psychosocial predisposition, then their absence might not be corrected by sample weighting based on demographics and party affiliation. This study explores whether there is a segment of the population with a personality or behavioral predisposition that makes them want to avoid polls (\"shy respondents\") and whether this affects their likelihood of survey participation and voting. As part of a national survey of motivators and barriers to survey participation, we had a proxy measure of survey shyness: \"I prefer to stay out of sight and not be counted in government surveys.\" We compare this stated predisposition to both willingness to participate in surveys and likelihood of voting. We find this \"shy respondent\" measure is related to stated willingness to participate in future surveys. Although \"shy respondents\" were less likely to vote than others, a majority \"always\" vote in presidential elections. Collectively, \"shy respondents\" who are unlikely to participate in surveys represent about 10% of \"likely voters\" in presidential elections. This survey shyness is also related to political alienation measures, which may lead to underrepresentation of more populist leaning respondents in pre-election surveys. The relationship of survey shyness to demographics is generally slight so demographic weighting is unlikely to correct for underrepresentation of \"shy respondents\" in pre-election polls.","PeriodicalId":74893,"journal":{"name":"Survey practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Shy Respondent and Propensity to Participate in Surveys: A Proof-of-Concept Study\",\"authors\":\"John Boyle, James Dayton, Randy ZuWallack, Ronaldo Iachan\",\"doi\":\"10.29115/sp-2014-0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Democratic presidential support among voters was overstated in 88% of national polls in 2016 and 93% in 2020. The \\\"shy voter\\\" phenomenon from British electoral politics was one explanation offered in the 2016 elections. Although a similar pattern occurred in 2020 election polls, the evidence does not support misrepresentation of voting intent by Trump supporters as the explanation. However, an alternative hypothesis of a self-selection bias against Trump voters in pre-election surveys has been proposed. Moreover, if these Trump voters were less likely to participate in surveys due to a psychosocial predisposition, then their absence might not be corrected by sample weighting based on demographics and party affiliation. This study explores whether there is a segment of the population with a personality or behavioral predisposition that makes them want to avoid polls (\\\"shy respondents\\\") and whether this affects their likelihood of survey participation and voting. As part of a national survey of motivators and barriers to survey participation, we had a proxy measure of survey shyness: \\\"I prefer to stay out of sight and not be counted in government surveys.\\\" We compare this stated predisposition to both willingness to participate in surveys and likelihood of voting. We find this \\\"shy respondent\\\" measure is related to stated willingness to participate in future surveys. Although \\\"shy respondents\\\" were less likely to vote than others, a majority \\\"always\\\" vote in presidential elections. Collectively, \\\"shy respondents\\\" who are unlikely to participate in surveys represent about 10% of \\\"likely voters\\\" in presidential elections. This survey shyness is also related to political alienation measures, which may lead to underrepresentation of more populist leaning respondents in pre-election surveys. The relationship of survey shyness to demographics is generally slight so demographic weighting is unlikely to correct for underrepresentation of \\\"shy respondents\\\" in pre-election polls.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Survey practice\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Survey practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29115/sp-2014-0026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29115/sp-2014-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2016年88%的全国民调和2020年93%的全国民调中,选民对民主党总统候选人的支持被夸大了。英国选举政治中的“害羞选民”现象是2016年选举中出现的一种解释。虽然在2020年的选举民意调查中也出现了类似的模式,但证据并不支持特朗普支持者歪曲投票意图的解释。然而,有人提出了另一种假设,即在选前调查中对特朗普选民存在自我选择偏见。此外,如果这些特朗普选民由于心理社会倾向而不太可能参与调查,那么他们的缺席可能无法通过基于人口统计学和党派关系的样本加权来纠正。这项研究探讨了是否有一部分人的性格或行为倾向使他们想要避免投票(“害羞的受访者”),以及这是否会影响他们参与调查和投票的可能性。作为一项关于参与调查的动机和障碍的全国性调查的一部分,我们有一个调查羞怯的代理衡量标准:“我宁愿远离人们的视线,不被计入政府调查。”我们将这种陈述倾向与参与调查的意愿和投票的可能性进行比较。我们发现这种“害羞的受访者”的措施是有关表示愿意参与未来的调查。尽管“害羞的受访者”比其他人更不可能投票,但大多数人“总是”在总统选举中投票。总体而言,不太可能参与调查的“害羞受访者”约占总统选举“可能选民”的10%。这种调查羞怯也与政治异化措施有关,这可能导致更多民粹主义倾向的受访者在选前调查中代表性不足。调查害羞与人口统计学的关系通常很小,因此人口统计学加权不太可能纠正选举前民意调查中“害羞受访者”的代表性不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Shy Respondent and Propensity to Participate in Surveys: A Proof-of-Concept Study
The Democratic presidential support among voters was overstated in 88% of national polls in 2016 and 93% in 2020. The "shy voter" phenomenon from British electoral politics was one explanation offered in the 2016 elections. Although a similar pattern occurred in 2020 election polls, the evidence does not support misrepresentation of voting intent by Trump supporters as the explanation. However, an alternative hypothesis of a self-selection bias against Trump voters in pre-election surveys has been proposed. Moreover, if these Trump voters were less likely to participate in surveys due to a psychosocial predisposition, then their absence might not be corrected by sample weighting based on demographics and party affiliation. This study explores whether there is a segment of the population with a personality or behavioral predisposition that makes them want to avoid polls ("shy respondents") and whether this affects their likelihood of survey participation and voting. As part of a national survey of motivators and barriers to survey participation, we had a proxy measure of survey shyness: "I prefer to stay out of sight and not be counted in government surveys." We compare this stated predisposition to both willingness to participate in surveys and likelihood of voting. We find this "shy respondent" measure is related to stated willingness to participate in future surveys. Although "shy respondents" were less likely to vote than others, a majority "always" vote in presidential elections. Collectively, "shy respondents" who are unlikely to participate in surveys represent about 10% of "likely voters" in presidential elections. This survey shyness is also related to political alienation measures, which may lead to underrepresentation of more populist leaning respondents in pre-election surveys. The relationship of survey shyness to demographics is generally slight so demographic weighting is unlikely to correct for underrepresentation of "shy respondents" in pre-election polls.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信