2017-2022年印尼扶贫增长指数和贫困当量增长率分析

Kartini Kartini, Ferica Christinawati Putri, Rizky Agusriyanti Irna, Sulistya Rini Pratiwi, Meylin Rahmawati
{"title":"2017-2022年印尼扶贫增长指数和贫困当量增长率分析","authors":"Kartini Kartini, Ferica Christinawati Putri, Rizky Agusriyanti Irna, Sulistya Rini Pratiwi, Meylin Rahmawati","doi":"10.37638/bima.4.2.165-172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze whether Indonesia is included in the pro poor, trickle down, or anti pro poor growth. The population of this study is all provinces in Indonesia in 2017-2022. Data collection techniques used are documentation and observation, in addition to the use of secondary data to answer research questions. The analytical tool used in this study is statistical analysis using the Pro Poor Growth Index (PPGI) and Poverty Equivalent Growth Rate (PEGR) methods. The results of this study indicate that Indonesia is classified as pro-poor growth where the benefits of growth are greater for the poor than non-poor people so that growth can help reduce poverty in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":487493,"journal":{"name":"Bima Journal","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALYSIS OF INDONESIA'S PRO POOR GROWTH INDEX AND POVERTY EQUIVALENT GROWTH RATE 2017-2022\",\"authors\":\"Kartini Kartini, Ferica Christinawati Putri, Rizky Agusriyanti Irna, Sulistya Rini Pratiwi, Meylin Rahmawati\",\"doi\":\"10.37638/bima.4.2.165-172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to analyze whether Indonesia is included in the pro poor, trickle down, or anti pro poor growth. The population of this study is all provinces in Indonesia in 2017-2022. Data collection techniques used are documentation and observation, in addition to the use of secondary data to answer research questions. The analytical tool used in this study is statistical analysis using the Pro Poor Growth Index (PPGI) and Poverty Equivalent Growth Rate (PEGR) methods. The results of this study indicate that Indonesia is classified as pro-poor growth where the benefits of growth are greater for the poor than non-poor people so that growth can help reduce poverty in Indonesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":487493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bima Journal\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bima Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37638/bima.4.2.165-172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bima Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37638/bima.4.2.165-172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析印尼是否属于亲贫增长、涓滴效应增长或反亲贫增长。本研究的人口是2017-2022年印度尼西亚所有省份的人口。除了使用二手数据来回答研究问题外,所使用的数据收集技术还包括记录和观察。本研究使用的分析工具是统计分析,采用亲贫困增长指数(PPGI)和贫困等效增长率(PEGR)方法。本研究的结果表明,印度尼西亚被归类为有利于贫困人口的增长,即增长对贫困人口的好处大于非贫困人口,因此增长可以帮助减少印度尼西亚的贫困。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALYSIS OF INDONESIA'S PRO POOR GROWTH INDEX AND POVERTY EQUIVALENT GROWTH RATE 2017-2022
This study aims to analyze whether Indonesia is included in the pro poor, trickle down, or anti pro poor growth. The population of this study is all provinces in Indonesia in 2017-2022. Data collection techniques used are documentation and observation, in addition to the use of secondary data to answer research questions. The analytical tool used in this study is statistical analysis using the Pro Poor Growth Index (PPGI) and Poverty Equivalent Growth Rate (PEGR) methods. The results of this study indicate that Indonesia is classified as pro-poor growth where the benefits of growth are greater for the poor than non-poor people so that growth can help reduce poverty in Indonesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信