韩国旧石器时代组合类型学的修订方案:以韩国临津-汉滩河地区为例

Yongwook Yoo
{"title":"韩国旧石器时代组合类型学的修订方案:以韩国临津-汉滩河地区为例","authors":"Yongwook Yoo","doi":"10.18040/sgs.2023.121.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely accepted the archaeological typology is one of the most important methodological instruments that can induce diverse research issues. Unfortunately, however, Korean palaeolithic research has witnessed few discussion and little endeavor to solve the ongoing typological problems. This article intends to establish a more refined Korean lithic typological scheme by addressing the conceptual issues and nature of archaeological types; and defines its role as a medium of communication among researchers. The Clark-Kleindienst scheme, widely accepted for the description of lithic assemblages from the Imjin-Hantan River area of Korea, is scrutinized and its major problems are articulated as: 1) over-emphasis of handaxe and its connection to other tools, 2) strong subjectivity of classifiers merely based on the “impresson” of lithic objects, and 3) semantic and grammatic fallacy of naming lithic types. In order to solve these problems, the reduction sequence and edge angles of lithic objects as well as the gestures to perform specific actions are taken into consideration in order to draw clearly defined types. As a result, total lithic objects can be integrated under a new typological scheme with hierarchical structure.","PeriodicalId":491062,"journal":{"name":"Han'gug sang'gosa hagbo","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Revised Typological Scheme of the Korean Palaeolithic Assemblages: The case of the Imjin-Hantan River Area, Korea\",\"authors\":\"Yongwook Yoo\",\"doi\":\"10.18040/sgs.2023.121.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is widely accepted the archaeological typology is one of the most important methodological instruments that can induce diverse research issues. Unfortunately, however, Korean palaeolithic research has witnessed few discussion and little endeavor to solve the ongoing typological problems. This article intends to establish a more refined Korean lithic typological scheme by addressing the conceptual issues and nature of archaeological types; and defines its role as a medium of communication among researchers. The Clark-Kleindienst scheme, widely accepted for the description of lithic assemblages from the Imjin-Hantan River area of Korea, is scrutinized and its major problems are articulated as: 1) over-emphasis of handaxe and its connection to other tools, 2) strong subjectivity of classifiers merely based on the “impresson” of lithic objects, and 3) semantic and grammatic fallacy of naming lithic types. In order to solve these problems, the reduction sequence and edge angles of lithic objects as well as the gestures to perform specific actions are taken into consideration in order to draw clearly defined types. As a result, total lithic objects can be integrated under a new typological scheme with hierarchical structure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":491062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Han'gug sang'gosa hagbo\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Han'gug sang'gosa hagbo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18040/sgs.2023.121.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Han'gug sang'gosa hagbo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18040/sgs.2023.121.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考古学类型学是一种重要的方法论工具,它可以引发各种各样的研究问题。然而,不幸的是,韩国旧石器时代的研究几乎没有讨论,也没有努力解决正在进行的类型学问题。本文试图通过解决考古类型的概念问题和性质,建立一个更完善的韩国石器类型方案;并将其定义为研究人员之间的交流媒介。Clark-Kleindienst方案被广泛接受,用于描述韩国临津汉滩河地区的石器组合,本文对其进行了仔细研究,并阐述了其主要问题:1)过度强调手斧及其与其他工具的联系,2)仅基于石器物体的“印象”的分类器的强烈主观性,以及3)命名石器类型的语义和语法谬误。为了解决这些问题,我们考虑了石器物体的还原顺序和边缘角度,以及执行特定动作的手势,从而绘制出明确的类型。因此,整个岩屑物体可以在一个具有层次结构的新类型方案下整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Revised Typological Scheme of the Korean Palaeolithic Assemblages: The case of the Imjin-Hantan River Area, Korea
It is widely accepted the archaeological typology is one of the most important methodological instruments that can induce diverse research issues. Unfortunately, however, Korean palaeolithic research has witnessed few discussion and little endeavor to solve the ongoing typological problems. This article intends to establish a more refined Korean lithic typological scheme by addressing the conceptual issues and nature of archaeological types; and defines its role as a medium of communication among researchers. The Clark-Kleindienst scheme, widely accepted for the description of lithic assemblages from the Imjin-Hantan River area of Korea, is scrutinized and its major problems are articulated as: 1) over-emphasis of handaxe and its connection to other tools, 2) strong subjectivity of classifiers merely based on the “impresson” of lithic objects, and 3) semantic and grammatic fallacy of naming lithic types. In order to solve these problems, the reduction sequence and edge angles of lithic objects as well as the gestures to perform specific actions are taken into consideration in order to draw clearly defined types. As a result, total lithic objects can be integrated under a new typological scheme with hierarchical structure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信