{"title":"心理健康服务使用者满意度评价:系统回顾","authors":"Lucas Subrinho, Elizangela Silva, Flavia Venâncio, Fabiana Xavier, Marcos Santos, Marluce Siqueira","doi":"10.56769/ijpn09204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: The idea of satisfaction as an indicator of quality of care has been expanding in Mental Health, since users have a unique perspective on services and the high satisfaction may be linked to greater treatment adherence and success, while the opposite may increase the user’s chance of abandoning the service. Objective: To evaluate which factors are evidenced by users in satisfaction with mental health services. This objective was developed to answer the following question: What factors are evidenced by users in satisfaction with mental health services? Method: A Systematic literature review was conducted by means of the databases PubMed, Scopus, Embase, SciELO, Web of Science, LILACS, Science Direct. The articles selected were evaluated for the level of evidence and quality of the studies. The selection of studies was performed by two reviewers' independence from each other, with the application of the criteria established in the protocol. In cases of disagreement, a third reviewer was consulted to make a final decision. After the search process and the selection of publications, the final sample consisted of 15 articles. Results: The studies demonstrated that users were satisfied with the healthcare in mental health services and the evidences were categorized into: interpersonal relationships, treatment strategies and organization of mental health services. The points for a greater degree of satisfaction were the comprehensive approach with effective communication between the professional-user, the ease of access to information, respect for autonomy, the co-participation of users in therapeutic planning, the active inclusion of family members and caregivers in the care process, the provision of a physical structure that provides comfort, privacy, as well as the development of outside activities. Conclusion: Due to the dynamic nature of the evaluation process, the search for user satisfaction should be ongoing and encompass process that beyond health professionals’ assistance, but also involve treatment strategies and organization of the service. Keywords: Patient satisfaction, Mental health services, Health evaluation.","PeriodicalId":92534,"journal":{"name":"International journal of psychology and neuroscience","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Users` Satisfaction with Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Lucas Subrinho, Elizangela Silva, Flavia Venâncio, Fabiana Xavier, Marcos Santos, Marluce Siqueira\",\"doi\":\"10.56769/ijpn09204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: The idea of satisfaction as an indicator of quality of care has been expanding in Mental Health, since users have a unique perspective on services and the high satisfaction may be linked to greater treatment adherence and success, while the opposite may increase the user’s chance of abandoning the service. Objective: To evaluate which factors are evidenced by users in satisfaction with mental health services. This objective was developed to answer the following question: What factors are evidenced by users in satisfaction with mental health services? Method: A Systematic literature review was conducted by means of the databases PubMed, Scopus, Embase, SciELO, Web of Science, LILACS, Science Direct. The articles selected were evaluated for the level of evidence and quality of the studies. The selection of studies was performed by two reviewers' independence from each other, with the application of the criteria established in the protocol. In cases of disagreement, a third reviewer was consulted to make a final decision. After the search process and the selection of publications, the final sample consisted of 15 articles. Results: The studies demonstrated that users were satisfied with the healthcare in mental health services and the evidences were categorized into: interpersonal relationships, treatment strategies and organization of mental health services. The points for a greater degree of satisfaction were the comprehensive approach with effective communication between the professional-user, the ease of access to information, respect for autonomy, the co-participation of users in therapeutic planning, the active inclusion of family members and caregivers in the care process, the provision of a physical structure that provides comfort, privacy, as well as the development of outside activities. Conclusion: Due to the dynamic nature of the evaluation process, the search for user satisfaction should be ongoing and encompass process that beyond health professionals’ assistance, but also involve treatment strategies and organization of the service. Keywords: Patient satisfaction, Mental health services, Health evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of psychology and neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of psychology and neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56769/ijpn09204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of psychology and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56769/ijpn09204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:满意度作为护理质量指标的概念在心理卫生领域得到了扩展,因为用户对服务有独特的看法,高满意度可能与更大的治疗依从性和成功有关,而反之则可能增加用户放弃服务的机会。目的:评价用户对心理卫生服务的满意度主要体现在哪些方面。制定这一目标是为了回答以下问题:用户对精神卫生服务的满意度证明了哪些因素?方法:利用PubMed、Scopus、Embase、SciELO、Web of Science、LILACS、Science Direct等数据库进行系统文献综述。对所选文章的证据水平和研究质量进行了评估。研究的选择是由两位独立的审稿人进行的,并采用了方案中建立的标准。如果意见不一致,则咨询第三位审稿人作出最终决定。经过检索过程和出版物的选择,最终样本包括15篇文章。结果:研究结果表明,心理健康服务使用者对心理健康服务感到满意,证据可分为人际关系、治疗策略和心理健康服务组织三个方面。满意度较高的点是专业用户之间有效沟通的综合方法,信息获取的便利性,对自主权的尊重,用户在治疗计划中的共同参与,家庭成员和护理人员在护理过程中的积极参与,提供舒适、隐私的物理结构,以及外部活动的发展。结论:由于评价过程的动态性,对用户满意度的追求应该是持续的,不仅包括卫生专业人员的帮助,还包括治疗策略和服务组织。关键词:患者满意度;心理卫生服务;健康评价
Evaluation of Users` Satisfaction with Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review
Abstract Background: The idea of satisfaction as an indicator of quality of care has been expanding in Mental Health, since users have a unique perspective on services and the high satisfaction may be linked to greater treatment adherence and success, while the opposite may increase the user’s chance of abandoning the service. Objective: To evaluate which factors are evidenced by users in satisfaction with mental health services. This objective was developed to answer the following question: What factors are evidenced by users in satisfaction with mental health services? Method: A Systematic literature review was conducted by means of the databases PubMed, Scopus, Embase, SciELO, Web of Science, LILACS, Science Direct. The articles selected were evaluated for the level of evidence and quality of the studies. The selection of studies was performed by two reviewers' independence from each other, with the application of the criteria established in the protocol. In cases of disagreement, a third reviewer was consulted to make a final decision. After the search process and the selection of publications, the final sample consisted of 15 articles. Results: The studies demonstrated that users were satisfied with the healthcare in mental health services and the evidences were categorized into: interpersonal relationships, treatment strategies and organization of mental health services. The points for a greater degree of satisfaction were the comprehensive approach with effective communication between the professional-user, the ease of access to information, respect for autonomy, the co-participation of users in therapeutic planning, the active inclusion of family members and caregivers in the care process, the provision of a physical structure that provides comfort, privacy, as well as the development of outside activities. Conclusion: Due to the dynamic nature of the evaluation process, the search for user satisfaction should be ongoing and encompass process that beyond health professionals’ assistance, but also involve treatment strategies and organization of the service. Keywords: Patient satisfaction, Mental health services, Health evaluation.