Mulligan (Nags) &;(Snags)和McKenzie(自我伸展)关于改善慢性颈部疼痛患者的疼痛和功能能力

Q4 Medicine
Sania Naz, Nargis Jamali, Arooj Iftikhar, Hira Nawaz, Touseef Iqbal, Faisal Ghafoor
{"title":"Mulligan (Nags) &;(Snags)和McKenzie(自我伸展)关于改善慢性颈部疼痛患者的疼痛和功能能力","authors":"Sania Naz, Nargis Jamali, Arooj Iftikhar, Hira Nawaz, Touseef Iqbal, Faisal Ghafoor","doi":"10.54393/pjhs.v4i08.501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neck pain is Consider the major problems and the prevalence of this musculoskeletal disorders are very common in people. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of mulligan and McKenzie on improving pain and functional ability in chronic neck patient. Methods: This trial was registered with Iranian trail registry with reference no: IRCT20220414054537N4. It’s a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial that was conducted in DHQ Hospital Shadrah a affiliated teaching hospital attached with Afro-Asia University Lahore from 1 May 2022 to 30 June 2022.The sample size was calculated and total 26 patients were divided into two groups. The ages of the patients were around 20-55 years old. The entire patient having the mechanical neck pain was included in this study. Patients were selected from DHQ hospital in May to June 2022 duration. In group A we applied the mulligan technique of manual therapy treatment that included the Natural apophyseal glides, sustained natural apophyseal glides and Self SNAGs in sitting position of the patient. The second group of 13 patients had applied the Mackenzie exercises in seven motions like 4 movement of neck extension,2 movements in lateral flexion and rotation and one movement in flexion direction. Results: Overall the post Numeric pain rating scale and Neck Disability index was significantly improved in group A which received the NAGs & SNAGs Mobilization technique. Conclusion: Mulligan (NAGs SNAGS) is effective than Mackenzie (self-stretching) treatment technique to improve the functional ability and reducing pain in chronic neck patient.","PeriodicalId":45690,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compare the Effectiveness of Mulligan (Nags & Snags) and McKenzie (Self-Stretching) On Improving the Pain and Functional Ability in Patient with Chronic Neck Pain\",\"authors\":\"Sania Naz, Nargis Jamali, Arooj Iftikhar, Hira Nawaz, Touseef Iqbal, Faisal Ghafoor\",\"doi\":\"10.54393/pjhs.v4i08.501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neck pain is Consider the major problems and the prevalence of this musculoskeletal disorders are very common in people. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of mulligan and McKenzie on improving pain and functional ability in chronic neck patient. Methods: This trial was registered with Iranian trail registry with reference no: IRCT20220414054537N4. It’s a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial that was conducted in DHQ Hospital Shadrah a affiliated teaching hospital attached with Afro-Asia University Lahore from 1 May 2022 to 30 June 2022.The sample size was calculated and total 26 patients were divided into two groups. The ages of the patients were around 20-55 years old. The entire patient having the mechanical neck pain was included in this study. Patients were selected from DHQ hospital in May to June 2022 duration. In group A we applied the mulligan technique of manual therapy treatment that included the Natural apophyseal glides, sustained natural apophyseal glides and Self SNAGs in sitting position of the patient. The second group of 13 patients had applied the Mackenzie exercises in seven motions like 4 movement of neck extension,2 movements in lateral flexion and rotation and one movement in flexion direction. Results: Overall the post Numeric pain rating scale and Neck Disability index was significantly improved in group A which received the NAGs & SNAGs Mobilization technique. Conclusion: Mulligan (NAGs SNAGS) is effective than Mackenzie (self-stretching) treatment technique to improve the functional ability and reducing pain in chronic neck patient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i08.501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i08.501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颈部疼痛是考虑的主要问题和患病率,这种肌肉骨骼疾病是很常见的人。目的:比较mulligan和McKenzie在改善慢性颈部疼痛和功能能力方面的效果。方法:本试验在伊朗试验注册中心注册,参考编号:IRCT20220414054537N4。这是一项双盲随机临床试验,于2022年5月1日至2022年6月30日在拉合尔亚非大学附属教学医院沙德拉DHQ医院进行。计算样本量,将26例患者分为两组。患者年龄在20-55岁之间。所有机械颈痛患者均纳入本研究。患者于2022年5月至6月期间从DHQ医院选择。A组采用mulligan手法治疗,包括自然椎体滑移、持续自然椎体滑移和患者坐位自我阻滞。第二组13例患者进行了颈部伸展4个动作、侧屈旋转2个动作、屈曲方向1个动作等7个动作的Mackenzie练习。结果:A组患者术后疼痛评定量表及颈部功能障碍指数均有明显改善;动员技术。结论:Mulligan (NAGs - SNAGS)比Mackenzie(自拉伸)治疗技术更能提高慢性颈部患者的功能能力,减轻疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compare the Effectiveness of Mulligan (Nags & Snags) and McKenzie (Self-Stretching) On Improving the Pain and Functional Ability in Patient with Chronic Neck Pain
Neck pain is Consider the major problems and the prevalence of this musculoskeletal disorders are very common in people. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of mulligan and McKenzie on improving pain and functional ability in chronic neck patient. Methods: This trial was registered with Iranian trail registry with reference no: IRCT20220414054537N4. It’s a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial that was conducted in DHQ Hospital Shadrah a affiliated teaching hospital attached with Afro-Asia University Lahore from 1 May 2022 to 30 June 2022.The sample size was calculated and total 26 patients were divided into two groups. The ages of the patients were around 20-55 years old. The entire patient having the mechanical neck pain was included in this study. Patients were selected from DHQ hospital in May to June 2022 duration. In group A we applied the mulligan technique of manual therapy treatment that included the Natural apophyseal glides, sustained natural apophyseal glides and Self SNAGs in sitting position of the patient. The second group of 13 patients had applied the Mackenzie exercises in seven motions like 4 movement of neck extension,2 movements in lateral flexion and rotation and one movement in flexion direction. Results: Overall the post Numeric pain rating scale and Neck Disability index was significantly improved in group A which received the NAGs & SNAGs Mobilization technique. Conclusion: Mulligan (NAGs SNAGS) is effective than Mackenzie (self-stretching) treatment technique to improve the functional ability and reducing pain in chronic neck patient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences
Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences is an international biomedical journal from Pakistan. We publish materials of interest to the practitioners and scientists in the broad field of medicine. Articles describing original qualitative, quantitative, human/animal clinical or laboratory studies are considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信