Ali Zubair, Imama Shakoor, Muhammad Saad Hassan, Shumaila Tahreem, Mehwish Iqbal, Kiran Haq, Muhammad Salman
{"title":"肌能技术单独及联合干预治疗非特异性腰痛的疗效观察","authors":"Ali Zubair, Imama Shakoor, Muhammad Saad Hassan, Shumaila Tahreem, Mehwish Iqbal, Kiran Haq, Muhammad Salman","doi":"10.54393/pjhs.v4i10.1122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-specific back pain is one of the prevalent musculoskeletal disorders in general population worldwide and also a major contributor of days lost from the work. It is considered one of the major causes of financial burden on the healthcare. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of muscle energy technique alone and in combination with interferential therapy in the management of non-specific back pain. Methods: After getting the review ethical committee approval from The Neurocounsel Clinics, current RCT was initiated from 21 May, 2023 to 20 September 2023 and registered at ClinicalTrails.gov under NCT06098053. Sample size was calculated by Epitool which came 30. Simple random sampling technique was used to randomize participants into two equal groups. Group A was given muscle energy technique and group B was given muscle energy technique plus interferential therapy. 2 sessions/week for 4 & half weeks. Evaluation was done at pain numeric scale & EQ-5D-5L (QoL). Pre and post-test analysis was done by use of SPSS version 21 and level of significance was kept p<0.05. Results: The mean age in group A was 31.40±10.91 whereas in group B it was 26.93±11.69. Mann Whitney U test showed significant difference (p<0.05) between groups on the basis of PNS and insignificant difference (p>0.05) between groups on the basis of QoL. Conclusions: It was concluded from the results of this study that MET and IFT are more effective in alleviating patient’s pain but are equally effective in improving quality of life in patients suffering from non-specific back pain.","PeriodicalId":45690,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences","volume":"34 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Muscle Energy Technique alone and in combination with Interferential Therapy for the Treatment of Non-specific Low Back Pain\",\"authors\":\"Ali Zubair, Imama Shakoor, Muhammad Saad Hassan, Shumaila Tahreem, Mehwish Iqbal, Kiran Haq, Muhammad Salman\",\"doi\":\"10.54393/pjhs.v4i10.1122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Non-specific back pain is one of the prevalent musculoskeletal disorders in general population worldwide and also a major contributor of days lost from the work. It is considered one of the major causes of financial burden on the healthcare. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of muscle energy technique alone and in combination with interferential therapy in the management of non-specific back pain. Methods: After getting the review ethical committee approval from The Neurocounsel Clinics, current RCT was initiated from 21 May, 2023 to 20 September 2023 and registered at ClinicalTrails.gov under NCT06098053. Sample size was calculated by Epitool which came 30. Simple random sampling technique was used to randomize participants into two equal groups. Group A was given muscle energy technique and group B was given muscle energy technique plus interferential therapy. 2 sessions/week for 4 & half weeks. Evaluation was done at pain numeric scale & EQ-5D-5L (QoL). Pre and post-test analysis was done by use of SPSS version 21 and level of significance was kept p<0.05. Results: The mean age in group A was 31.40±10.91 whereas in group B it was 26.93±11.69. Mann Whitney U test showed significant difference (p<0.05) between groups on the basis of PNS and insignificant difference (p>0.05) between groups on the basis of QoL. Conclusions: It was concluded from the results of this study that MET and IFT are more effective in alleviating patient’s pain but are equally effective in improving quality of life in patients suffering from non-specific back pain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i10.1122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i10.1122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
非特异性背部疼痛是世界范围内普遍存在的肌肉骨骼疾病之一,也是造成工作损失的主要原因。它被认为是医疗保健财政负担的主要原因之一。目的:比较单用肌能技术与联合干预治疗非特异性腰痛的疗效。方法:在获得the Neurocounsel Clinics的审查伦理委员会批准后,本RCT于2023年5月21日至2023年9月20日启动,并在ClinicalTrails.gov注册,编号为NCT06098053。样本大小由Epitool计算,结果为30。采用简单随机抽样技术将参与者随机分为两组。A组采用肌能技术,B组采用肌能技术加干预治疗。2节/周,4 &半周。评估是在疼痛数值量表&EQ-5D-5L (QoL)。采用SPSS version 21进行前后分析,显著性水平为p<0.05。结果:A组平均年龄为31.40±10.91岁,B组平均年龄为26.93±11.69岁。Mann Whitney U检验显示PNS组间差异显著(p>0.05), QoL组间差异不显著(p>0.05)。结论:本研究结果表明MET和IFT在缓解患者疼痛方面更有效,但在改善非特异性腰痛患者的生活质量方面同样有效。
Efficacy of Muscle Energy Technique alone and in combination with Interferential Therapy for the Treatment of Non-specific Low Back Pain
Non-specific back pain is one of the prevalent musculoskeletal disorders in general population worldwide and also a major contributor of days lost from the work. It is considered one of the major causes of financial burden on the healthcare. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of muscle energy technique alone and in combination with interferential therapy in the management of non-specific back pain. Methods: After getting the review ethical committee approval from The Neurocounsel Clinics, current RCT was initiated from 21 May, 2023 to 20 September 2023 and registered at ClinicalTrails.gov under NCT06098053. Sample size was calculated by Epitool which came 30. Simple random sampling technique was used to randomize participants into two equal groups. Group A was given muscle energy technique and group B was given muscle energy technique plus interferential therapy. 2 sessions/week for 4 & half weeks. Evaluation was done at pain numeric scale & EQ-5D-5L (QoL). Pre and post-test analysis was done by use of SPSS version 21 and level of significance was kept p<0.05. Results: The mean age in group A was 31.40±10.91 whereas in group B it was 26.93±11.69. Mann Whitney U test showed significant difference (p<0.05) between groups on the basis of PNS and insignificant difference (p>0.05) between groups on the basis of QoL. Conclusions: It was concluded from the results of this study that MET and IFT are more effective in alleviating patient’s pain but are equally effective in improving quality of life in patients suffering from non-specific back pain.
期刊介绍:
Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences is an international biomedical journal from Pakistan. We publish materials of interest to the practitioners and scientists in the broad field of medicine. Articles describing original qualitative, quantitative, human/animal clinical or laboratory studies are considered for publication.