这不是美国:在多党制中衡量两极分化。准复制研究

QOE-IJES Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.36253/qoe-14034
Luana Russo, Emma Turkenburg, Eelco Harteveld, Anna Heckhausen
{"title":"这不是美国:在多党制中衡量两极分化。准复制研究","authors":"Luana Russo, Emma Turkenburg, Eelco Harteveld, Anna Heckhausen","doi":"10.36253/qoe-14034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last decade, affective polarization (AP) has become an increasingly salient topic in both public discourse and political science. Several different measurement instruments have been developed to empirically capture this phenomenon. With the rising interest that affective polarization is now also enjoying in Europe, it has become of the utmost importance to assess what these different measures capture, and to what extent their application travels to different contexts. In this study we test several AP measures on a student population with various European nationalities. We assess their overlap and effectiveness in mapping AP, to help future research working towards greater empirical clarity, and making informed choices on which kind of measures to include in questionnaires and data collections. The results indicate that, while different items usually produce different point estimates and sometimes different answer patterns, the measurement of affective polarization appears relatively indifferent to the choice of items.","PeriodicalId":496861,"journal":{"name":"QOE-IJES","volume":"14 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"This is not US: measuring polarization in multiparty systems. A quasi-replication study\",\"authors\":\"Luana Russo, Emma Turkenburg, Eelco Harteveld, Anna Heckhausen\",\"doi\":\"10.36253/qoe-14034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the last decade, affective polarization (AP) has become an increasingly salient topic in both public discourse and political science. Several different measurement instruments have been developed to empirically capture this phenomenon. With the rising interest that affective polarization is now also enjoying in Europe, it has become of the utmost importance to assess what these different measures capture, and to what extent their application travels to different contexts. In this study we test several AP measures on a student population with various European nationalities. We assess their overlap and effectiveness in mapping AP, to help future research working towards greater empirical clarity, and making informed choices on which kind of measures to include in questionnaires and data collections. The results indicate that, while different items usually produce different point estimates and sometimes different answer patterns, the measurement of affective polarization appears relatively indifferent to the choice of items.\",\"PeriodicalId\":496861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"QOE-IJES\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"QOE-IJES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36253/qoe-14034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QOE-IJES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/qoe-14034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的十年中,情感极化(AP)已经成为公共话语和政治科学中日益突出的话题。已经开发了几种不同的测量仪器来经验地捕捉这一现象。随着欧洲对情感两极分化的兴趣日益浓厚,评估这些不同的测量方法所捕获的内容,以及它们在不同背景下的应用程度,变得至关重要。在这项研究中,我们对不同欧洲国籍的学生群体进行了几项AP测量。我们评估了它们在AP制图中的重叠和有效性,以帮助未来的研究朝着更大的经验清晰度工作,并在调查问卷和数据收集中做出明智的选择。结果表明,虽然不同的问题通常会产生不同的点估计,有时会产生不同的回答模式,但情感极化的测量与问题的选择相对无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
This is not US: measuring polarization in multiparty systems. A quasi-replication study
In the last decade, affective polarization (AP) has become an increasingly salient topic in both public discourse and political science. Several different measurement instruments have been developed to empirically capture this phenomenon. With the rising interest that affective polarization is now also enjoying in Europe, it has become of the utmost importance to assess what these different measures capture, and to what extent their application travels to different contexts. In this study we test several AP measures on a student population with various European nationalities. We assess their overlap and effectiveness in mapping AP, to help future research working towards greater empirical clarity, and making informed choices on which kind of measures to include in questionnaires and data collections. The results indicate that, while different items usually produce different point estimates and sometimes different answer patterns, the measurement of affective polarization appears relatively indifferent to the choice of items.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信