{"title":"基于微软数学与传统学习的水的比较研究","authors":"Masdelima Azizah Sormin, Lisna Agustina, Benny Sofyan Samosir, Lilik Herawati Parapat, Khairunnisa Khairunnisa, Aisyah Karimah","doi":"10.35568/naturalistic.v8i1.4092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to see differences in learning outcomes in mathematics using AIR learning based on Microsoft Mathematics and traditional learning in class XI MAS Pondok Pesantren Modern K.H. Ahmad Dahlan Sipirok. This type of quantitative research uses test instruments. The sample consisted of 2 classes, namely the experimental class (AIR learning based on Microsoft Mathematics) and the control class (Traditional learning). Analysis of the data used is a prerequisite test using the average similarity test and hypothesis testing by calculating the average. The research hypotheses: 1) Knowing the increase in students' mathematics learning outcomes by using Water-Based Microsoft Mathematics learning and Traditional learning, 2) Knowing the differences in increasing mathematics learning outcomes between Water-Based Microsoft Mathematics learning and Traditional learning. After the research was carried out, the results showed that there were differences between learning Water-Based Microsoft Mathematics and Traditional learning. The average test of students' mathematics learning outcomes through AIR learning based on Microsoft Mathematics was obtained by 76.66% of the 30 students who took the test or met the minimum completeness criteria (KKM), namely 75%. And for the results of student activities to obtain an overall percentage value of 81%, and for the results of student activities to obtain an overall percentage value of 80%.
 Meanwhile, the average test score for students' mathematics learning outcomes through traditional learning reached 84.6% of the 25 students who took the test or met the minimum completeness criteria (KKM), namely 75%. And for the results of student activities to obtain an overall percentage value of 80%. Both learning are equally good to use in the learning learning process. However, it can be seen from the results obtained that traditional learning has higher results compared to AIR learning based on Microsoft Mathematics. One of the obstacles that causes this to happen is the lack of an internet network and frequent power outages. And for today's students, they miss the process of learning while playing. And they get it during the traditional learning process (bombing games)—Target Outcome of Scientific Publication in Sinta National Journal with ISSN.","PeriodicalId":493528,"journal":{"name":"Naturalistic : jurnal kajian dan penelitian pendidikan dan pembelajaran","volume":"513 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Water Based on Microsoft Mathematics With Traditional Learning\",\"authors\":\"Masdelima Azizah Sormin, Lisna Agustina, Benny Sofyan Samosir, Lilik Herawati Parapat, Khairunnisa Khairunnisa, Aisyah Karimah\",\"doi\":\"10.35568/naturalistic.v8i1.4092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aimed to see differences in learning outcomes in mathematics using AIR learning based on Microsoft Mathematics and traditional learning in class XI MAS Pondok Pesantren Modern K.H. Ahmad Dahlan Sipirok. This type of quantitative research uses test instruments. The sample consisted of 2 classes, namely the experimental class (AIR learning based on Microsoft Mathematics) and the control class (Traditional learning). Analysis of the data used is a prerequisite test using the average similarity test and hypothesis testing by calculating the average. The research hypotheses: 1) Knowing the increase in students' mathematics learning outcomes by using Water-Based Microsoft Mathematics learning and Traditional learning, 2) Knowing the differences in increasing mathematics learning outcomes between Water-Based Microsoft Mathematics learning and Traditional learning. After the research was carried out, the results showed that there were differences between learning Water-Based Microsoft Mathematics and Traditional learning. The average test of students' mathematics learning outcomes through AIR learning based on Microsoft Mathematics was obtained by 76.66% of the 30 students who took the test or met the minimum completeness criteria (KKM), namely 75%. And for the results of student activities to obtain an overall percentage value of 81%, and for the results of student activities to obtain an overall percentage value of 80%.
 Meanwhile, the average test score for students' mathematics learning outcomes through traditional learning reached 84.6% of the 25 students who took the test or met the minimum completeness criteria (KKM), namely 75%. And for the results of student activities to obtain an overall percentage value of 80%. Both learning are equally good to use in the learning learning process. However, it can be seen from the results obtained that traditional learning has higher results compared to AIR learning based on Microsoft Mathematics. One of the obstacles that causes this to happen is the lack of an internet network and frequent power outages. And for today's students, they miss the process of learning while playing. And they get it during the traditional learning process (bombing games)—Target Outcome of Scientific Publication in Sinta National Journal with ISSN.\",\"PeriodicalId\":493528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Naturalistic : jurnal kajian dan penelitian pendidikan dan pembelajaran\",\"volume\":\"513 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Naturalistic : jurnal kajian dan penelitian pendidikan dan pembelajaran\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35568/naturalistic.v8i1.4092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naturalistic : jurnal kajian dan penelitian pendidikan dan pembelajaran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35568/naturalistic.v8i1.4092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这种类型的定量研究使用测试仪器。样本由2个班组成,即实验班(基于微软数学的AIR学习)和控制班(传统学习)。使用的数据分析是一个前提检验使用平均相似检验和假设检验通过计算平均值。研究假设:1)了解基于水的微软数学学习与传统学习对学生数学学习成果的提高;2)了解基于水的微软数学学习与传统学习在提高数学学习成果方面的差异。研究开展后,结果表明,学习基于水的微软数学与传统学习存在差异。在30名参加测试或达到最低完备标准(KKM)的学生中,通过微软数学AIR学习的学生数学学习成果的平均测试率为76.66%,即75%。并且对于学生活动的结果获得的总体百分比值为81%,对于学生活动的结果获得的总体百分比值为80%。
同时,在25名参加测试或达到最低完整性标准(KKM)的学生中,学生通过传统学习获得的数学学习成果的平均测试分数达到84.6%,即75%。而对于学生活动结果获得的总体百分比值为80%。两种学习都同样好用在学习学习的过程中。然而,从得到的结果可以看出,传统学习比基于微软数学的AIR学习有更高的效果。导致这种情况发生的障碍之一是缺乏互联网网络和频繁的停电。而对于今天的学生来说,他们错过了边玩边学的过程。他们在传统的学习过程(轰炸游戏)中得到了它——ISSN Sinta National Journal上科学出版物的目标结果。
Comparative Study of Water Based on Microsoft Mathematics With Traditional Learning
The study aimed to see differences in learning outcomes in mathematics using AIR learning based on Microsoft Mathematics and traditional learning in class XI MAS Pondok Pesantren Modern K.H. Ahmad Dahlan Sipirok. This type of quantitative research uses test instruments. The sample consisted of 2 classes, namely the experimental class (AIR learning based on Microsoft Mathematics) and the control class (Traditional learning). Analysis of the data used is a prerequisite test using the average similarity test and hypothesis testing by calculating the average. The research hypotheses: 1) Knowing the increase in students' mathematics learning outcomes by using Water-Based Microsoft Mathematics learning and Traditional learning, 2) Knowing the differences in increasing mathematics learning outcomes between Water-Based Microsoft Mathematics learning and Traditional learning. After the research was carried out, the results showed that there were differences between learning Water-Based Microsoft Mathematics and Traditional learning. The average test of students' mathematics learning outcomes through AIR learning based on Microsoft Mathematics was obtained by 76.66% of the 30 students who took the test or met the minimum completeness criteria (KKM), namely 75%. And for the results of student activities to obtain an overall percentage value of 81%, and for the results of student activities to obtain an overall percentage value of 80%.
Meanwhile, the average test score for students' mathematics learning outcomes through traditional learning reached 84.6% of the 25 students who took the test or met the minimum completeness criteria (KKM), namely 75%. And for the results of student activities to obtain an overall percentage value of 80%. Both learning are equally good to use in the learning learning process. However, it can be seen from the results obtained that traditional learning has higher results compared to AIR learning based on Microsoft Mathematics. One of the obstacles that causes this to happen is the lack of an internet network and frequent power outages. And for today's students, they miss the process of learning while playing. And they get it during the traditional learning process (bombing games)—Target Outcome of Scientific Publication in Sinta National Journal with ISSN.