评估人工淋巴引流配合泰式传统按摩对剖宫产后早产儿母亲母乳量、乳房疼痛和充血的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照试验

Q3 Nursing
Sutisa Sritas, Sudatip Kositamongkol, Sonthaya Nukaw, Pratya Phetkate
{"title":"评估人工淋巴引流配合泰式传统按摩对剖宫产后早产儿母亲母乳量、乳房疼痛和充血的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Sutisa Sritas, Sudatip Kositamongkol, Sonthaya Nukaw, Pratya Phetkate","doi":"10.2174/0118749445267207230919070638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Less breast milk, breast pain, and engorgement are issues that the majority of postpartum mothers have to confront and overcome. Objective: This study examined the efficacy of Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD), Thai Traditional Massage (TTM), and standard post-partum nursing care on breast milk volume, breast pain, and engorgement in post-cesarean mothers of preterm infants. Methods: Thirty-two participants were randomly divided into 2 groups: an intervention group receiving MLD, TTM, and standard post-partum nursing care (n=16), and a control group receiving standard post-partum nursing care alone (n=16). Outcomes were assessed through breast milk volume, breast pain and engorgement scores, and participant satisfaction. Results: The study showed that the group receiving MLD, TTM, and standard post-partum nursing care had a safe and equivalent level of breast milk production compared to the control group. Additionally, there were no significant differences between groups regarding daily milk expression frequency, breast pain, and engorgement over seven days (p>0.05). However, the experimental group expressed a high level of satisfaction with the MLD, TTM, and standard post-partum nursing care interventions. Conclusion: The combination of MLD, TTM, and standard post-partum nursing care could be a viable alternative for managing post-cesarean care in mothers with preterm infants. Clinical Trial Reg Number: TCTR20230330002.","PeriodicalId":38960,"journal":{"name":"Open Public Health Journal","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Manual Lymphatic Drainage with Thai Traditional Massage on Breast Milk Volume, Breast Pain and Engorgement in Post-Cesarean Mothers of Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Sutisa Sritas, Sudatip Kositamongkol, Sonthaya Nukaw, Pratya Phetkate\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0118749445267207230919070638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Less breast milk, breast pain, and engorgement are issues that the majority of postpartum mothers have to confront and overcome. Objective: This study examined the efficacy of Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD), Thai Traditional Massage (TTM), and standard post-partum nursing care on breast milk volume, breast pain, and engorgement in post-cesarean mothers of preterm infants. Methods: Thirty-two participants were randomly divided into 2 groups: an intervention group receiving MLD, TTM, and standard post-partum nursing care (n=16), and a control group receiving standard post-partum nursing care alone (n=16). Outcomes were assessed through breast milk volume, breast pain and engorgement scores, and participant satisfaction. Results: The study showed that the group receiving MLD, TTM, and standard post-partum nursing care had a safe and equivalent level of breast milk production compared to the control group. Additionally, there were no significant differences between groups regarding daily milk expression frequency, breast pain, and engorgement over seven days (p>0.05). However, the experimental group expressed a high level of satisfaction with the MLD, TTM, and standard post-partum nursing care interventions. Conclusion: The combination of MLD, TTM, and standard post-partum nursing care could be a viable alternative for managing post-cesarean care in mothers with preterm infants. Clinical Trial Reg Number: TCTR20230330002.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Public Health Journal\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Public Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118749445267207230919070638\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Public Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118749445267207230919070638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:母乳量减少,乳房疼痛和充血是大多数产后母亲必须面对和克服的问题。目的:探讨手工淋巴引流(MLD)、泰式传统按摩(TTM)和标准产后护理对剖宫产后早产儿母亲母乳量、乳房疼痛和充血的影响。方法:32名受试者随机分为两组:干预组(n=16)和对照组(n=16),分别接受MLD、TTM和标准产后护理。结果通过母乳量、乳房疼痛和充盈评分以及参与者满意度来评估。结果:研究表明,与对照组相比,接受MLD、TTM和标准产后护理的组母乳产量安全且相当。此外,在7天内,两组之间在每日泌乳频率、乳房疼痛和充血方面无显著差异(p>0.05)。然而,实验组对MLD、TTM和标准的产后护理干预措施表达了高水平的满意度。结论:MLD、TTM与标准的产后护理相结合,是处理早产母亲剖宫产后护理的可行选择。临床试验注册号:TCTR20230330002。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Manual Lymphatic Drainage with Thai Traditional Massage on Breast Milk Volume, Breast Pain and Engorgement in Post-Cesarean Mothers of Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: Less breast milk, breast pain, and engorgement are issues that the majority of postpartum mothers have to confront and overcome. Objective: This study examined the efficacy of Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD), Thai Traditional Massage (TTM), and standard post-partum nursing care on breast milk volume, breast pain, and engorgement in post-cesarean mothers of preterm infants. Methods: Thirty-two participants were randomly divided into 2 groups: an intervention group receiving MLD, TTM, and standard post-partum nursing care (n=16), and a control group receiving standard post-partum nursing care alone (n=16). Outcomes were assessed through breast milk volume, breast pain and engorgement scores, and participant satisfaction. Results: The study showed that the group receiving MLD, TTM, and standard post-partum nursing care had a safe and equivalent level of breast milk production compared to the control group. Additionally, there were no significant differences between groups regarding daily milk expression frequency, breast pain, and engorgement over seven days (p>0.05). However, the experimental group expressed a high level of satisfaction with the MLD, TTM, and standard post-partum nursing care interventions. Conclusion: The combination of MLD, TTM, and standard post-partum nursing care could be a viable alternative for managing post-cesarean care in mothers with preterm infants. Clinical Trial Reg Number: TCTR20230330002.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Public Health Journal
Open Public Health Journal Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: The Open Public Health Journal is an Open Access online journal which publishes original research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, short articles and guest edited single topic issues in the field of public health. Topics covered in this interdisciplinary journal include: public health policy and practice; theory and methods; occupational health and education; epidemiology; social medicine; health services research; ethics; environmental health; adolescent health; AIDS care; mental health care. The Open Public Health Journal, a peer reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and freely available worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信