组织双重性和知识管理:基于智能模型的治理的系统视角

IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Stefano Armenia, Sergio Barile, Francesca Iandolo, Alessandro Pompei, Luigi Maria Sicca
{"title":"组织双重性和知识管理:基于智能模型的治理的系统视角","authors":"Stefano Armenia, Sergio Barile, Francesca Iandolo, Alessandro Pompei, Luigi Maria Sicca","doi":"10.1002/sres.2985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this paper is to propose a new framework for the governance of ‘modern’ smart organisations that integrates IT‐based orientation to decision‐making, systems thinking through system dynamics modelling and cybernetics. The design of the proposed framework is based on the key role played by knowledge in the governance of organisations. The literature on ambidexterity, organisational learning, knowledge management and systems thinking is the adopted research background. A synthesis of the connection points between these fields is proposed within a theoretical framework named Smart Model‐based Organisations. The main result of this work is represented by the proposed Smart Model‐based Governance (SMbG) framework and an example of application. There are two main findings related to the contribution of the proposed framework: the overcoming of ‘data‐based’ approaches that favour rigidity in knowledge governance and the contribution of systems approaches that, increasing organisational involvement, improve knowledge governance.","PeriodicalId":47538,"journal":{"name":"SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE","volume":"16 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organisational ambidexterity and knowledge management: A systems perspective towards Smart Model‐based Governance\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Armenia, Sergio Barile, Francesca Iandolo, Alessandro Pompei, Luigi Maria Sicca\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sres.2985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The purpose of this paper is to propose a new framework for the governance of ‘modern’ smart organisations that integrates IT‐based orientation to decision‐making, systems thinking through system dynamics modelling and cybernetics. The design of the proposed framework is based on the key role played by knowledge in the governance of organisations. The literature on ambidexterity, organisational learning, knowledge management and systems thinking is the adopted research background. A synthesis of the connection points between these fields is proposed within a theoretical framework named Smart Model‐based Organisations. The main result of this work is represented by the proposed Smart Model‐based Governance (SMbG) framework and an example of application. There are two main findings related to the contribution of the proposed framework: the overcoming of ‘data‐based’ approaches that favour rigidity in knowledge governance and the contribution of systems approaches that, increasing organisational involvement, improve knowledge governance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2985\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2985","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是为“现代”智能组织的治理提出一个新的框架,该框架通过系统动力学建模和控制论将基于IT的导向与决策、系统思维相结合。所提出的框架的设计是基于知识在组织治理中所起的关键作用。本文采用了双元性、组织学习、知识管理和系统思维方面的文献作为研究背景。在一个名为基于智能模型的组织的理论框架内,提出了这些领域之间连接点的综合。这项工作的主要成果由提出的基于智能模型的治理(SMbG)框架和应用示例表示。有两个主要的发现与提出的框架的贡献有关:克服了“基于数据”的方法,这种方法有利于知识治理的刚性,以及系统方法的贡献,增加了组织的参与,改善了知识治理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Organisational ambidexterity and knowledge management: A systems perspective towards Smart Model‐based Governance
Abstract The purpose of this paper is to propose a new framework for the governance of ‘modern’ smart organisations that integrates IT‐based orientation to decision‐making, systems thinking through system dynamics modelling and cybernetics. The design of the proposed framework is based on the key role played by knowledge in the governance of organisations. The literature on ambidexterity, organisational learning, knowledge management and systems thinking is the adopted research background. A synthesis of the connection points between these fields is proposed within a theoretical framework named Smart Model‐based Organisations. The main result of this work is represented by the proposed Smart Model‐based Governance (SMbG) framework and an example of application. There are two main findings related to the contribution of the proposed framework: the overcoming of ‘data‐based’ approaches that favour rigidity in knowledge governance and the contribution of systems approaches that, increasing organisational involvement, improve knowledge governance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
14.80%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Systems Research and Behavioral Science publishes original articles on new theories, experimental research, and applications relating to all levels of living and non-living systems. Its scope is comprehensive, dealing with systems approaches to: the redesign of organisational and societal structures; the management of administrative and business processes; problems of change management; the implementation of procedures to increase the quality of work and life; the resolution of clashes of norms and values; social cognitive processes; modelling; the introduction of new scientific results, etc. The editors especially want manuscripts of a theoretical or empirical nature which have broad interdisciplinary implications not found in a journal devoted to a single discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信