{"title":"全球动荡下的创新驱动经济增长:各国如何加强创新体系以应对威胁","authors":"Valeriya Vlasova, Anastasia Saprykina","doi":"10.1080/10438599.2023.2276318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe role of innovation as a major force of economic growth is not to doubt. Despite this, geopolitical challenges in recent years pose difficulties for countries, especially for those who struggle with lower GDP per-capita, to enhance innovative performance and grow. Building upon the national innovation system concept and using the methodological framework of country-level composite innovation indexes, this paper aims to explore features of innovation systems inherent in lagging economies and their relevance for economic growth. The analysis, based on a panel dataset comprising the Global Innovation Index elementary indicators on 76 countries during 2015–2021, demonstrates the lower initial state, but faster development of innovation system components in lagging economies. Crucial to their growth is the external validation of national innovation efforts, proxied by international trade and foreign investment indicators. In addition, a sustainable economic growth requires balanced and synergetic development of all components and functions. Therefore, bottom-up approaches are needed to sustain further growth of lagging economies, starting with the provision of effective resource allocation, knowledge creation and its diffusion.KEYWORDS: national innovation systemeconomic growthglobal innovation indexcross-country analysislagging economiesSUBJECT CLASSIFICATION CODES: O11O36O47O57P51 AcknowledgementsWe thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. We also express our gratitude to Dr. Vitaliy Roud (Zagreb School of Economics and Management) for his valuable suggestions on the initial stage of the study.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The World Bank Income Group Classification is yearly revised, which makes it impossible to use the division for the longitudinal analysis. Hence, the authors used alternative approach to classify the countries, applied for e.g. in (Fagerberg, Srholec, and Knell Citation2007).2 The choice of sample median as a threshold to classify countries is dictated by the presence of some outliers in the data that would produce a less balanced sample, in case the sample average was used.3 The ‘oblique' rotation type is preferred over orthogonal rotations such as ‘varimax normalized' rotation, since the latter assumes that the underlying factors are close to be completely uncorrelated, which is a too strong assumption (Fabrigar et al. Citation1999). The scree plot analysis was further conducted in order to define the resulting number of principal components to be retained.4 The model considers both the initial value for the period and the growth rate of the corresponding NIS componentsAdditional informationFundingThe article was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program of the HSE University.","PeriodicalId":51485,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Innovation and New Technology","volume":"8 22","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovation-driven economic growth under global turbulence: how countries strengthen innovation systems to deal with threats\",\"authors\":\"Valeriya Vlasova, Anastasia Saprykina\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10438599.2023.2276318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThe role of innovation as a major force of economic growth is not to doubt. Despite this, geopolitical challenges in recent years pose difficulties for countries, especially for those who struggle with lower GDP per-capita, to enhance innovative performance and grow. Building upon the national innovation system concept and using the methodological framework of country-level composite innovation indexes, this paper aims to explore features of innovation systems inherent in lagging economies and their relevance for economic growth. The analysis, based on a panel dataset comprising the Global Innovation Index elementary indicators on 76 countries during 2015–2021, demonstrates the lower initial state, but faster development of innovation system components in lagging economies. Crucial to their growth is the external validation of national innovation efforts, proxied by international trade and foreign investment indicators. In addition, a sustainable economic growth requires balanced and synergetic development of all components and functions. Therefore, bottom-up approaches are needed to sustain further growth of lagging economies, starting with the provision of effective resource allocation, knowledge creation and its diffusion.KEYWORDS: national innovation systemeconomic growthglobal innovation indexcross-country analysislagging economiesSUBJECT CLASSIFICATION CODES: O11O36O47O57P51 AcknowledgementsWe thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. We also express our gratitude to Dr. Vitaliy Roud (Zagreb School of Economics and Management) for his valuable suggestions on the initial stage of the study.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The World Bank Income Group Classification is yearly revised, which makes it impossible to use the division for the longitudinal analysis. Hence, the authors used alternative approach to classify the countries, applied for e.g. in (Fagerberg, Srholec, and Knell Citation2007).2 The choice of sample median as a threshold to classify countries is dictated by the presence of some outliers in the data that would produce a less balanced sample, in case the sample average was used.3 The ‘oblique' rotation type is preferred over orthogonal rotations such as ‘varimax normalized' rotation, since the latter assumes that the underlying factors are close to be completely uncorrelated, which is a too strong assumption (Fabrigar et al. Citation1999). The scree plot analysis was further conducted in order to define the resulting number of principal components to be retained.4 The model considers both the initial value for the period and the growth rate of the corresponding NIS componentsAdditional informationFundingThe article was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program of the HSE University.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Innovation and New Technology\",\"volume\":\"8 22\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Innovation and New Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2023.2276318\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Innovation and New Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2023.2276318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要创新作为经济增长的主要动力,其作用是毋庸置疑的。尽管如此,近年来的地缘政治挑战给各国,特别是那些人均GDP较低的国家,带来了提高创新绩效和增长的困难。本文以国家创新系统概念为基础,运用国家级综合创新指数的方法框架,探讨落后经济体创新系统的内在特征及其与经济增长的相关性。基于2015-2021年76个国家的全球创新指数基本指标的面板数据集的分析表明,落后经济体的创新体系组成部分的初始状态较低,但发展速度更快。对它们的增长至关重要的是,以国际贸易和外国投资指标为代表的国家创新努力得到外部认可。此外,可持续的经济增长需要各组成部分和功能的平衡和协同发展。因此,需要自下而上的方法来维持落后经济体的进一步增长,从提供有效的资源配置、知识创造及其传播开始。关键词:国家创新体系经济增长全球创新指数跨国分析经济体主题分类代码:O11O36O47O57P51致谢感谢编者和匿名审稿人提供的帮助。我们还要感谢萨格勒布经济管理学院的维塔利·鲁德博士在研究初期提出的宝贵建议。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1世界银行收入组别分类每年修订一次,因此无法使用该分类进行纵向分析。因此,作者使用替代方法对国家进行分类,例如在(Fagerberg, Srholec, and Knell Citation2007)中应用选择样本中位数作为对国家进行分类的阈值是由于数据中存在一些异常值,如果使用样本平均值,则会产生不太平衡的样本“倾斜”旋转类型比正交旋转(如“变大归一化”旋转)更受欢迎,因为正交旋转假设潜在因素接近完全不相关,这是一个过于强烈的假设(Fabrigar等人)。Citation1999)。为了确定要保留的主成分的数量,进一步进行了屏幕图分析该模型同时考虑了该时期的初始值和相应NIS组件的增长率。附加信息资金来源本文是在HSE大学基础研究计划的框架内编写的。
Innovation-driven economic growth under global turbulence: how countries strengthen innovation systems to deal with threats
ABSTRACTThe role of innovation as a major force of economic growth is not to doubt. Despite this, geopolitical challenges in recent years pose difficulties for countries, especially for those who struggle with lower GDP per-capita, to enhance innovative performance and grow. Building upon the national innovation system concept and using the methodological framework of country-level composite innovation indexes, this paper aims to explore features of innovation systems inherent in lagging economies and their relevance for economic growth. The analysis, based on a panel dataset comprising the Global Innovation Index elementary indicators on 76 countries during 2015–2021, demonstrates the lower initial state, but faster development of innovation system components in lagging economies. Crucial to their growth is the external validation of national innovation efforts, proxied by international trade and foreign investment indicators. In addition, a sustainable economic growth requires balanced and synergetic development of all components and functions. Therefore, bottom-up approaches are needed to sustain further growth of lagging economies, starting with the provision of effective resource allocation, knowledge creation and its diffusion.KEYWORDS: national innovation systemeconomic growthglobal innovation indexcross-country analysislagging economiesSUBJECT CLASSIFICATION CODES: O11O36O47O57P51 AcknowledgementsWe thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. We also express our gratitude to Dr. Vitaliy Roud (Zagreb School of Economics and Management) for his valuable suggestions on the initial stage of the study.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The World Bank Income Group Classification is yearly revised, which makes it impossible to use the division for the longitudinal analysis. Hence, the authors used alternative approach to classify the countries, applied for e.g. in (Fagerberg, Srholec, and Knell Citation2007).2 The choice of sample median as a threshold to classify countries is dictated by the presence of some outliers in the data that would produce a less balanced sample, in case the sample average was used.3 The ‘oblique' rotation type is preferred over orthogonal rotations such as ‘varimax normalized' rotation, since the latter assumes that the underlying factors are close to be completely uncorrelated, which is a too strong assumption (Fabrigar et al. Citation1999). The scree plot analysis was further conducted in order to define the resulting number of principal components to be retained.4 The model considers both the initial value for the period and the growth rate of the corresponding NIS componentsAdditional informationFundingThe article was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program of the HSE University.
期刊介绍:
Economics of Innovation and New Technology is devoted to the theoretical and empirical analysis of the determinants and effects of innovation, new technology and technological knowledge. The journal aims to provide a bridge between different strands of literature and different contributions of economic theory and empirical economics. This bridge is built in two ways. First, by encouraging empirical research (including case studies, econometric work and historical research), evaluating existing economic theory, and suggesting appropriate directions for future effort in theoretical work. Second, by exploring ways of applying and testing existing areas of theory to the economics of innovation and new technology, and ways of using theoretical insights to inform data collection and other empirical research. The journal welcomes contributions across a wide range of issues concerned with innovation, including: the generation of new technological knowledge, innovation in product markets, process innovation, patenting, adoption, diffusion, innovation and technology policy, international competitiveness, standardization and network externalities, innovation and growth, technology transfer, innovation and market structure, innovation and the environment, and across a broad range of economic activity not just in ‘high technology’ areas. The journal is open to a variety of methodological approaches ranging from case studies to econometric exercises with sound theoretical modelling, empirical evidence both longitudinal and cross-sectional about technologies, regions, firms, industries and countries.