对母乳储备和哺乳辅助设备的知识、态度和实践——印度一家三级医院医护人员的异同

Q4 Medicine
Srijan Singh, Sushant Mane, Srishti Singh, Rohit Rai
{"title":"对母乳储备和哺乳辅助设备的知识、态度和实践——印度一家三级医院医护人员的异同","authors":"Srijan Singh, Sushant Mane, Srishti Singh, Rohit Rai","doi":"10.1177/09732179231204777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Lactation education is an integral part of healthcare. In order to recognise and address the inconsistencies in perceptions, attitudes and delivery of lactation care, we developed the Lactation Aids and Milk Banking (LAMB) survey. Aim The purpose of the study was to compare the knowledge, attitude and practices of doctors and nurses about human milk banking and lactation aids and to examine institutional and individual barriers to and facilitators of the delivery of lactation care. Methods It was a cross-sectional study, and the survey questionnaire was administered electronically to neonatal physicians and nurses in a tertiary care hospital in India. Results There were 86 participants, including 54 doctors (63%) and 32 (37%) nurses. There was no significant difference in the knowledge score of doctors and nurses ( p = .61), although doctors scored significantly higher on the attitude and practices score as compared to nurses ( p < .0001). Amongst the doctors, the knowledge score was higher for faculty than residents ( p < .0001), though residents scored significantly higher on the attitude and practices score than faculty ( p = .0002). This study highlighted five facilitators and two barriers to LAMB and also revealed that physicians and nurses have relatively inadequate knowledge about lactational aids and milk banking. Conclusion Lactation education for staff can reinforce support for milk banking and lactation aids, thereby achieving the goal of exclusive breastfeeding. It is also important to mitigate barriers by establishing policies and guidelines in the unit for milk banking and the use of lactation aids.","PeriodicalId":16516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neonatology","volume":"6 S1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Towards Milk Banking and Lactation Aids – Similarities and Differences of Medical and Nursing Staff in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India\",\"authors\":\"Srijan Singh, Sushant Mane, Srishti Singh, Rohit Rai\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09732179231204777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Lactation education is an integral part of healthcare. In order to recognise and address the inconsistencies in perceptions, attitudes and delivery of lactation care, we developed the Lactation Aids and Milk Banking (LAMB) survey. Aim The purpose of the study was to compare the knowledge, attitude and practices of doctors and nurses about human milk banking and lactation aids and to examine institutional and individual barriers to and facilitators of the delivery of lactation care. Methods It was a cross-sectional study, and the survey questionnaire was administered electronically to neonatal physicians and nurses in a tertiary care hospital in India. Results There were 86 participants, including 54 doctors (63%) and 32 (37%) nurses. There was no significant difference in the knowledge score of doctors and nurses ( p = .61), although doctors scored significantly higher on the attitude and practices score as compared to nurses ( p < .0001). Amongst the doctors, the knowledge score was higher for faculty than residents ( p < .0001), though residents scored significantly higher on the attitude and practices score than faculty ( p = .0002). This study highlighted five facilitators and two barriers to LAMB and also revealed that physicians and nurses have relatively inadequate knowledge about lactational aids and milk banking. Conclusion Lactation education for staff can reinforce support for milk banking and lactation aids, thereby achieving the goal of exclusive breastfeeding. It is also important to mitigate barriers by establishing policies and guidelines in the unit for milk banking and the use of lactation aids.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neonatology\",\"volume\":\"6 S1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neonatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09732179231204777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09732179231204777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

哺乳期教育是医疗保健的重要组成部分。为了认识和解决观念、态度和哺乳护理的不一致,我们开发了哺乳辅助和母乳银行(LAMB)调查。目的比较医生和护士对母乳库和助乳器的知识、态度和做法,探讨机构和个人对哺乳护理提供的障碍和促进因素。方法采用横断面研究,以电子方式对印度某三级医院的新生儿医师和护士进行问卷调查。结果共86人,其中医生54人(63%),护士32人(37%)。医生和护士的知识得分无显著差异(p = 0.61),但医生的态度和实践得分明显高于护士(p <。)。在医生中,教师的知识得分高于住院医师(p <.0001),尽管住院医生的态度和实践得分明显高于教师(p = .0002)。这项研究强调了五个促进因素和两个障碍,也揭示了医生和护士对哺乳辅助和母乳银行的知识相对不足。结论对工作人员进行哺乳教育,可以加强对母乳库和哺乳辅助设备的支持,从而达到纯母乳喂养的目的。同样重要的是,通过制定政策和指导方针,在单位母乳银行和使用哺乳助剂减少障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Towards Milk Banking and Lactation Aids – Similarities and Differences of Medical and Nursing Staff in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India
Introduction Lactation education is an integral part of healthcare. In order to recognise and address the inconsistencies in perceptions, attitudes and delivery of lactation care, we developed the Lactation Aids and Milk Banking (LAMB) survey. Aim The purpose of the study was to compare the knowledge, attitude and practices of doctors and nurses about human milk banking and lactation aids and to examine institutional and individual barriers to and facilitators of the delivery of lactation care. Methods It was a cross-sectional study, and the survey questionnaire was administered electronically to neonatal physicians and nurses in a tertiary care hospital in India. Results There were 86 participants, including 54 doctors (63%) and 32 (37%) nurses. There was no significant difference in the knowledge score of doctors and nurses ( p = .61), although doctors scored significantly higher on the attitude and practices score as compared to nurses ( p < .0001). Amongst the doctors, the knowledge score was higher for faculty than residents ( p < .0001), though residents scored significantly higher on the attitude and practices score than faculty ( p = .0002). This study highlighted five facilitators and two barriers to LAMB and also revealed that physicians and nurses have relatively inadequate knowledge about lactational aids and milk banking. Conclusion Lactation education for staff can reinforce support for milk banking and lactation aids, thereby achieving the goal of exclusive breastfeeding. It is also important to mitigate barriers by establishing policies and guidelines in the unit for milk banking and the use of lactation aids.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neonatology
Journal of Neonatology Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信