阿里阿德娜诗歌中的怪诞未来与矛盾情感García

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, ROMANCE
Paul Cahill
{"title":"阿里阿德娜诗歌中的怪诞未来与矛盾情感García","authors":"Paul Cahill","doi":"10.1080/08831157.2023.2252805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe work of Spanish poet Ariadna G. García (Madrid, 1977) occupies an unusual place within the archive of modern queer Spanish poetry. Collections like Construyéndome en ti (1997), Napalm. Cortometraje poético (2001), La Guerra de Invierno (2013), Helio (2014), and Ciudad sumergida (2018) are the product of a changing society in which poets can engage with questions surrounding queer participation in social institutions like couples and families as a concrete reality instead of imagined and anticipated future possibilities. The past(s), present(s), and future(s) that García’s poems explore highlight the potential that both negative and positive emotions have as sources of meaning for queer subjects and vehicles through which to imagine and think through potential alternative roles, identities, and opportunities. This poetry traces how poetic subjects who seek out social benefits and strive to make the most of fleeting moments of happiness and record past and present struggles for future generations stake out a complex position between hetero- and homonormativity and look beyond what José Esteban Muñoz has termed “the quagmire of the present.” Futurity in García’s work thus builds on positive affect in the present to imagine, project and cope with future moments, in the process demonstrating that queer utopianism need not rely on a negative view of the present to imagine a more inclusive future.Keywords: AffectAriadna G. Garcíacontemporary Spanish poetryfuturityqueer poetry AcknowledgmentI would like to thank Enrique Álvarez, Alfredo Martínez Expósito, and Gema Pérez-Sánchez for their thorough and insightful feedback on earlier versions of this article.Notes1 Following the publication of her first collection, García won the prestigious Premio Hiperión de Poesía with her next collection, Napalm. Cortometraje poético (2001), followed four years later by Apátrida, which received the Premio de Arte Joven –Poesía– de la Comunidad de Madrid. Almost a decade later she published La Guerra de Invierno (2013), which received the Premio Internacional «Miguel Hernández-Comunidad Valenciana» and was a finalist for the Premio de la Crítica de Madrid. This collection was followed by Helio a year later and then by Línea de flotación (2017) and Ciudad sumergida (2018). García is also the author of two novels, Inercia (2014) and El año cero (2019), in addition to a volume of children’s poetry, Las noches de Ugglebo (2016). Her work has appeared in both generational and gendered anthologies like Veinticinco poetas españoles jóvenes (2003) and (Tras)lúcidas. Poesía escrita por mujeres (1980–2016) (2016).2 Perhaps the clearest example of this approach can be found in García Montero’s 1992 essay entitled “¿Por qué no sirve para nada la poesía? (Observaciones en defensa de una poesía para los seres normales),” included in ¿Por qué no es útil la literatura? (1993), a volume co-authored with Spanish novelist Antonio Muñoz Molina. For a thorough overview of the tenets and tendencies of the poesía de la experiencia, see “Palabras de familia gastadas tibiamente (Notas para la historia de un paradigma lírico),” the introduction to Araceli Iravedra’s anthology of this school of poetry.3 Particularly notable examples of this same sort of critique can be found in Jorge Riechmann’s “El derrotado duerme en el campo de batalla” (31), the Colectivo Alicia Bajo Cero’s Poesía y poder, and Vicente Luis Mora’s Singularidades. Ética y poética de la literatura española actual (49–52).4 Proponents of Queer Utopianism include critics like Tim Dean, José Esteban Muñoz, and Michael D. Snediker, while those whose work privileges negativity include Leo Bersani, Lee Edelman, and Jack Halberstam.5 Some of the contemporary poets Castro puts in this category include Cristina Peri Rossi (1941–), Pureza Canelo (1946-), Concha García, Katy Parra (1964–), María Eloy-García (1972–), and Txus García (1974–).6 Duggan’s term follows Susan Stryker’s earlier use of the term homonormativity “to articulate the double sense of marginalization and displacement experienced within transgender political and cultural activism” (145).7 In Dentro/Fuera. El espacio homosexual masculino en la poesía española del siglo XX, his study of gay male Spanish poets Federico García Lorca (1898–1936), Cernuda, Gil de Biedma, and Luis Antonio de Villena (1951–), Enrique Álvarez attributes a similar potential for “reworking […] the heteronormative” to queer identities, identifying “un reverso táctico que transforma los territorios del trauma y de la marginación homosexual en el distintivo de una subjetividad queer que, si por un lado reafirma el modelo de sociabilidad heterosexual, cuestiona por el otro su eficacia” (17).8 The intertextual dialogue between García’s work and that of gay male poets like Cernuda and Gil de Biedma could be the object of its own study. For our purposes, it is worth pointing out that the work of both Cernuda and García presents a basic trajectory made up of anticipated experiences and encounters, actual encounters, and imagined encounters in distant and isolated spaces. One of the most significant differences between Cernuda’s and García’s representation of queer affect and experience, though, is the more antisocial approach that characterizes much of Cernuda’s work.9 In a study dedicated to the poetry of Francisco Brines, Mayhew explains that “[p]ronouns of ambiguous gender . . . are more frequent in gay than in heterosexual love poetry, in which there is no particular reason to conceal the sex of the object of desire” (“Francisco Brines,” 142). For a discussion of Cernuda’s use of tú as a splitting technique, see Michael Ugarte’s Shifting Ground: Spanish Civil War Exile Literature (170–71).10 While to a certain extent one could draw a parallel between this poem from Construyéndome en ti and Gil de Biedma’s “Albada” (84-85), which is itself built upon an intertextual dialogue with a medieval form, it is also important to ask whether the social consequences faced by each couple would be the same.11 A similar phenomenon appears in “Nevada” and “Daytona,” two poems included in Cernuda’s Un río, un amor (147; 154–55).","PeriodicalId":41843,"journal":{"name":"ROMANCE QUARTERLY","volume":"248 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Queer Futurity and Conflicted Feeling(s) in the Poetry of Ariadna G. García\",\"authors\":\"Paul Cahill\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08831157.2023.2252805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThe work of Spanish poet Ariadna G. García (Madrid, 1977) occupies an unusual place within the archive of modern queer Spanish poetry. Collections like Construyéndome en ti (1997), Napalm. Cortometraje poético (2001), La Guerra de Invierno (2013), Helio (2014), and Ciudad sumergida (2018) are the product of a changing society in which poets can engage with questions surrounding queer participation in social institutions like couples and families as a concrete reality instead of imagined and anticipated future possibilities. The past(s), present(s), and future(s) that García’s poems explore highlight the potential that both negative and positive emotions have as sources of meaning for queer subjects and vehicles through which to imagine and think through potential alternative roles, identities, and opportunities. This poetry traces how poetic subjects who seek out social benefits and strive to make the most of fleeting moments of happiness and record past and present struggles for future generations stake out a complex position between hetero- and homonormativity and look beyond what José Esteban Muñoz has termed “the quagmire of the present.” Futurity in García’s work thus builds on positive affect in the present to imagine, project and cope with future moments, in the process demonstrating that queer utopianism need not rely on a negative view of the present to imagine a more inclusive future.Keywords: AffectAriadna G. Garcíacontemporary Spanish poetryfuturityqueer poetry AcknowledgmentI would like to thank Enrique Álvarez, Alfredo Martínez Expósito, and Gema Pérez-Sánchez for their thorough and insightful feedback on earlier versions of this article.Notes1 Following the publication of her first collection, García won the prestigious Premio Hiperión de Poesía with her next collection, Napalm. Cortometraje poético (2001), followed four years later by Apátrida, which received the Premio de Arte Joven –Poesía– de la Comunidad de Madrid. Almost a decade later she published La Guerra de Invierno (2013), which received the Premio Internacional «Miguel Hernández-Comunidad Valenciana» and was a finalist for the Premio de la Crítica de Madrid. This collection was followed by Helio a year later and then by Línea de flotación (2017) and Ciudad sumergida (2018). García is also the author of two novels, Inercia (2014) and El año cero (2019), in addition to a volume of children’s poetry, Las noches de Ugglebo (2016). Her work has appeared in both generational and gendered anthologies like Veinticinco poetas españoles jóvenes (2003) and (Tras)lúcidas. Poesía escrita por mujeres (1980–2016) (2016).2 Perhaps the clearest example of this approach can be found in García Montero’s 1992 essay entitled “¿Por qué no sirve para nada la poesía? (Observaciones en defensa de una poesía para los seres normales),” included in ¿Por qué no es útil la literatura? (1993), a volume co-authored with Spanish novelist Antonio Muñoz Molina. For a thorough overview of the tenets and tendencies of the poesía de la experiencia, see “Palabras de familia gastadas tibiamente (Notas para la historia de un paradigma lírico),” the introduction to Araceli Iravedra’s anthology of this school of poetry.3 Particularly notable examples of this same sort of critique can be found in Jorge Riechmann’s “El derrotado duerme en el campo de batalla” (31), the Colectivo Alicia Bajo Cero’s Poesía y poder, and Vicente Luis Mora’s Singularidades. Ética y poética de la literatura española actual (49–52).4 Proponents of Queer Utopianism include critics like Tim Dean, José Esteban Muñoz, and Michael D. Snediker, while those whose work privileges negativity include Leo Bersani, Lee Edelman, and Jack Halberstam.5 Some of the contemporary poets Castro puts in this category include Cristina Peri Rossi (1941–), Pureza Canelo (1946-), Concha García, Katy Parra (1964–), María Eloy-García (1972–), and Txus García (1974–).6 Duggan’s term follows Susan Stryker’s earlier use of the term homonormativity “to articulate the double sense of marginalization and displacement experienced within transgender political and cultural activism” (145).7 In Dentro/Fuera. El espacio homosexual masculino en la poesía española del siglo XX, his study of gay male Spanish poets Federico García Lorca (1898–1936), Cernuda, Gil de Biedma, and Luis Antonio de Villena (1951–), Enrique Álvarez attributes a similar potential for “reworking […] the heteronormative” to queer identities, identifying “un reverso táctico que transforma los territorios del trauma y de la marginación homosexual en el distintivo de una subjetividad queer que, si por un lado reafirma el modelo de sociabilidad heterosexual, cuestiona por el otro su eficacia” (17).8 The intertextual dialogue between García’s work and that of gay male poets like Cernuda and Gil de Biedma could be the object of its own study. For our purposes, it is worth pointing out that the work of both Cernuda and García presents a basic trajectory made up of anticipated experiences and encounters, actual encounters, and imagined encounters in distant and isolated spaces. One of the most significant differences between Cernuda’s and García’s representation of queer affect and experience, though, is the more antisocial approach that characterizes much of Cernuda’s work.9 In a study dedicated to the poetry of Francisco Brines, Mayhew explains that “[p]ronouns of ambiguous gender . . . are more frequent in gay than in heterosexual love poetry, in which there is no particular reason to conceal the sex of the object of desire” (“Francisco Brines,” 142). For a discussion of Cernuda’s use of tú as a splitting technique, see Michael Ugarte’s Shifting Ground: Spanish Civil War Exile Literature (170–71).10 While to a certain extent one could draw a parallel between this poem from Construyéndome en ti and Gil de Biedma’s “Albada” (84-85), which is itself built upon an intertextual dialogue with a medieval form, it is also important to ask whether the social consequences faced by each couple would be the same.11 A similar phenomenon appears in “Nevada” and “Daytona,” two poems included in Cernuda’s Un río, un amor (147; 154–55).\",\"PeriodicalId\":41843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ROMANCE QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"248 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ROMANCE QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08831157.2023.2252805\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, ROMANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ROMANCE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08831157.2023.2252805","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要西班牙诗人阿里阿德娜·g·García(马德里,1977)的作品在现代西班牙酷儿诗歌档案中占有不同寻常的地位。比如1997年的《幻影》和《凝固汽油弹》。《Cortometraje po》(2001年)、《La Guerra de Invierno》(2013年)、《Helio》(2014年)和《Ciudad sumergida》(2018年)是一个不断变化的社会的产物,在这个社会中,诗人可以将同性恋参与社会机构(如夫妻和家庭)的问题作为具体的现实,而不是想象和预期的未来可能性。García的诗歌探索了过去、现在和未来,强调了消极和积极情绪作为酷儿主题的意义来源的潜力,以及通过想象和思考潜在的替代角色、身份和机会的工具。这首诗追溯了诗歌的主题是如何寻求社会利益,努力最大限度地利用转瞬即逝的幸福时刻,为后代记录过去和现在的斗争,在异性恋和同性之间找到一个复杂的位置,并超越了约瑟·埃斯特班Muñoz所说的“现在的泥潭”。因此,García作品中的未来建立在当下的积极影响上,以想象、规划和应对未来时刻,在这个过程中,酷儿乌托邦主义不需要依赖于对当下的消极看法来想象一个更具包容性的未来。关键词:affectarina G. Garcíacontemporary西班牙诗歌未来酷儿诗歌致谢我要感谢Enrique Álvarez、Alfredo Martínez Expósito和Gema Pérez-Sánchez对本文早期版本的全面而深刻的反馈。在她的第一个系列出版后,García凭借她的下一个系列Napalm赢得了享有声望的Premio Hiperión de Poesía。Cortometraje potico(2001年),四年后,Apátrida获得了马德里社区艺术奖-Poesía。近十年后,她出版了La Guerra de Invierno(2013),获得了国际Premio«Miguel Hernández-Comunidad Valenciana»,并入围了马德里Premio de La Crítica。一年后,Helio推出了这个系列,然后是Línea de flotación(2017)和Ciudad sumergida(2018)。García还著有两部小说《惯性》(2014)和《año cero》(2019),以及一本儿童诗歌《Las noches de Ugglebo》(2016)。她的作品出现在诸如Veinticinco poetas españoles jóvenes(2003)和(Tras)lúcidas等代际和性别选集中。Poesía escrita por mujeres (1980-2016) (2016).2也许这种方法最清晰的例子可以在García蒙特罗1992年题为“¿Por ququeno sirve para nada la poesía?”(《关于保护人权的观察》poesía《关于人权的观察》),载于《关于人权的观察》útil《文学》?(1993),与西班牙小说家安东尼奥Muñoz莫利纳合著。关于poesía经验派的原则和倾向的全面概述,请参见Araceli Iravedra的这一诗歌流派选集的介绍“Palabras de familia gastadas tibiamente (Notas para la historia de un paradigm lírico)”这种批判的特别显著的例子可以在Jorge Riechmann的“El derrotado duerme en El campo de batalla”(31)、Alicia Bajo Cero的《Poesía y粉》和Vicente Luis Mora的《Singularidades》中找到。3 . Ética y poacimtica de la literatura española actual (49-52)酷儿乌托邦主义的支持者包括Tim Dean, jos<s:1> Esteban Muñoz和Michael D. Snediker等评论家,而那些工作特权负面的人包括Leo Bersani, Lee Edelman和Jack halberstamm。卡斯特罗认为这一类的当代诗人包括Cristina Peri Rossi (1941 -), Pureza Canelo (1946-), Concha García, Katy Parra (1964 -), María Eloy-García(1972 -)和Txus García (1974 -)杜根的术语遵循苏珊·斯崔克(Susan Stryker)早期使用的术语“同性性”(homonormativity),“以阐明跨性别者在政治和文化活动中所经历的边缘化和流离失所的双重感觉”(145)在Dentro / Fuera。他对西班牙男同性恋诗人Federico García Lorca(1898-1936)、Cernuda、Gil de Biedma和Luis Antonio de Villena(1951 -)的研究中,恩里克Álvarez认为同性恋身份具有类似的“重新工作[…]异性恋标准”的潜力,认为“unreverso táctico que transforma los territorios del trauma y de la marginación homosexual en El specitivo de una subtivad queer que”。“我认为联合国应该重申异性恋的社会模式”,“我认为这是一种社会模式”(17)García的作品与像Cernuda和Gil de Biedma这样的男同性恋诗人的作品之间的互文对话可以成为它自己研究的对象。 为了我们的目的,值得指出的是,Cernuda和García的工作都呈现了一个基本的轨迹,由预期的经验和遭遇,实际的遭遇,以及在遥远和孤立的空间中想象的遭遇组成。然而,瑟尔努达和García对酷儿情感和经历的表现最显著的区别之一是,瑟尔努达的大部分作品都采用了反社会的方法在一项专门研究弗朗西斯科·布里恩斯诗歌的研究中,梅休解释说:“性别模糊的代名词……在同性恋爱情诗中比在异性恋爱情诗中更常见,在异性恋爱情诗中,没有特别的理由隐瞒欲望对象的性别”(“弗朗西斯科·布里恩斯,”142)。关于切尔努达使用tú作为分裂技巧的讨论,请参见迈克尔·乌加特的《转移的土地:西班牙内战流亡文学》(170-71)虽然在某种程度上,人们可以将这首诗与吉尔·德·比德玛的《阿尔巴达》(84-85)进行比较,这首诗本身就是建立在与中世纪形式的互文对话之上的,但同样重要的是要问每对夫妇面临的社会后果是否相同类似的现象也出现在《内华达》和《代托纳》中,这两首诗收录在瑟尔努达的《爱》río,《爱》(147;154 - 55)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Queer Futurity and Conflicted Feeling(s) in the Poetry of Ariadna G. García
AbstractThe work of Spanish poet Ariadna G. García (Madrid, 1977) occupies an unusual place within the archive of modern queer Spanish poetry. Collections like Construyéndome en ti (1997), Napalm. Cortometraje poético (2001), La Guerra de Invierno (2013), Helio (2014), and Ciudad sumergida (2018) are the product of a changing society in which poets can engage with questions surrounding queer participation in social institutions like couples and families as a concrete reality instead of imagined and anticipated future possibilities. The past(s), present(s), and future(s) that García’s poems explore highlight the potential that both negative and positive emotions have as sources of meaning for queer subjects and vehicles through which to imagine and think through potential alternative roles, identities, and opportunities. This poetry traces how poetic subjects who seek out social benefits and strive to make the most of fleeting moments of happiness and record past and present struggles for future generations stake out a complex position between hetero- and homonormativity and look beyond what José Esteban Muñoz has termed “the quagmire of the present.” Futurity in García’s work thus builds on positive affect in the present to imagine, project and cope with future moments, in the process demonstrating that queer utopianism need not rely on a negative view of the present to imagine a more inclusive future.Keywords: AffectAriadna G. Garcíacontemporary Spanish poetryfuturityqueer poetry AcknowledgmentI would like to thank Enrique Álvarez, Alfredo Martínez Expósito, and Gema Pérez-Sánchez for their thorough and insightful feedback on earlier versions of this article.Notes1 Following the publication of her first collection, García won the prestigious Premio Hiperión de Poesía with her next collection, Napalm. Cortometraje poético (2001), followed four years later by Apátrida, which received the Premio de Arte Joven –Poesía– de la Comunidad de Madrid. Almost a decade later she published La Guerra de Invierno (2013), which received the Premio Internacional «Miguel Hernández-Comunidad Valenciana» and was a finalist for the Premio de la Crítica de Madrid. This collection was followed by Helio a year later and then by Línea de flotación (2017) and Ciudad sumergida (2018). García is also the author of two novels, Inercia (2014) and El año cero (2019), in addition to a volume of children’s poetry, Las noches de Ugglebo (2016). Her work has appeared in both generational and gendered anthologies like Veinticinco poetas españoles jóvenes (2003) and (Tras)lúcidas. Poesía escrita por mujeres (1980–2016) (2016).2 Perhaps the clearest example of this approach can be found in García Montero’s 1992 essay entitled “¿Por qué no sirve para nada la poesía? (Observaciones en defensa de una poesía para los seres normales),” included in ¿Por qué no es útil la literatura? (1993), a volume co-authored with Spanish novelist Antonio Muñoz Molina. For a thorough overview of the tenets and tendencies of the poesía de la experiencia, see “Palabras de familia gastadas tibiamente (Notas para la historia de un paradigma lírico),” the introduction to Araceli Iravedra’s anthology of this school of poetry.3 Particularly notable examples of this same sort of critique can be found in Jorge Riechmann’s “El derrotado duerme en el campo de batalla” (31), the Colectivo Alicia Bajo Cero’s Poesía y poder, and Vicente Luis Mora’s Singularidades. Ética y poética de la literatura española actual (49–52).4 Proponents of Queer Utopianism include critics like Tim Dean, José Esteban Muñoz, and Michael D. Snediker, while those whose work privileges negativity include Leo Bersani, Lee Edelman, and Jack Halberstam.5 Some of the contemporary poets Castro puts in this category include Cristina Peri Rossi (1941–), Pureza Canelo (1946-), Concha García, Katy Parra (1964–), María Eloy-García (1972–), and Txus García (1974–).6 Duggan’s term follows Susan Stryker’s earlier use of the term homonormativity “to articulate the double sense of marginalization and displacement experienced within transgender political and cultural activism” (145).7 In Dentro/Fuera. El espacio homosexual masculino en la poesía española del siglo XX, his study of gay male Spanish poets Federico García Lorca (1898–1936), Cernuda, Gil de Biedma, and Luis Antonio de Villena (1951–), Enrique Álvarez attributes a similar potential for “reworking […] the heteronormative” to queer identities, identifying “un reverso táctico que transforma los territorios del trauma y de la marginación homosexual en el distintivo de una subjetividad queer que, si por un lado reafirma el modelo de sociabilidad heterosexual, cuestiona por el otro su eficacia” (17).8 The intertextual dialogue between García’s work and that of gay male poets like Cernuda and Gil de Biedma could be the object of its own study. For our purposes, it is worth pointing out that the work of both Cernuda and García presents a basic trajectory made up of anticipated experiences and encounters, actual encounters, and imagined encounters in distant and isolated spaces. One of the most significant differences between Cernuda’s and García’s representation of queer affect and experience, though, is the more antisocial approach that characterizes much of Cernuda’s work.9 In a study dedicated to the poetry of Francisco Brines, Mayhew explains that “[p]ronouns of ambiguous gender . . . are more frequent in gay than in heterosexual love poetry, in which there is no particular reason to conceal the sex of the object of desire” (“Francisco Brines,” 142). For a discussion of Cernuda’s use of tú as a splitting technique, see Michael Ugarte’s Shifting Ground: Spanish Civil War Exile Literature (170–71).10 While to a certain extent one could draw a parallel between this poem from Construyéndome en ti and Gil de Biedma’s “Albada” (84-85), which is itself built upon an intertextual dialogue with a medieval form, it is also important to ask whether the social consequences faced by each couple would be the same.11 A similar phenomenon appears in “Nevada” and “Daytona,” two poems included in Cernuda’s Un río, un amor (147; 154–55).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ROMANCE QUARTERLY
ROMANCE QUARTERLY LITERATURE, ROMANCE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Lorca and Baudelaire, Chrétien de Troyes and Borges. The articles in Romance Quarterly provide insight into classic and contemporary works of literature originating in the Romance languages. The journal publishes historical and interpretative articles primarily on French and Spanish literature but also on Catalan, Italian, Portuguese, and Brazilian literature. RQ contains critical essays and book reviews, mostly in English but also in Romance languages, by scholars from universities all over the world. Romance Quarterly belongs in every department and library of Romance languages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信