以责任辩护为基础对法律主观性的批判性思考

Ivan Raičević
{"title":"以责任辩护为基础对法律主观性的批判性思考","authors":"Ivan Raičević","doi":"10.55836/pip_23312a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inspired by the different theoretical positions from which he was taught by the professors in the subjects of Obligation Law and Commercial Law, as a student of the third and fourth year of studies, the author critically analyzes the argumentation according to which contractual liability is a subjective one and tries to answer the question of whether that argumentation fully supports the conclusion of debtor’s fault as a general basis of contractual liability. In this context, the author analyzes not only the Obligation Relationships Act , but also individual solutions from the Draft of the Serbian Civil Code as well as the Draft Code on Obligations and Contracts of 1969 (in Serbian: Skica za zakonik o obligacijama i ugovorima). Also, the author analyzes provisions of the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods in the context of the application of the aforementioned argumentation. After considering the positions present in the legal theory, the author concludes that the mentioned interpretation is inconsistent and based on unstable, unreliable and legally uncertain foundations.","PeriodicalId":306662,"journal":{"name":"Pravo i privreda","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kritički osvrt na tumačenje o subjektivnoj prirodi opšteg osnova ugovorne odgovornosti\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Raičević\",\"doi\":\"10.55836/pip_23312a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inspired by the different theoretical positions from which he was taught by the professors in the subjects of Obligation Law and Commercial Law, as a student of the third and fourth year of studies, the author critically analyzes the argumentation according to which contractual liability is a subjective one and tries to answer the question of whether that argumentation fully supports the conclusion of debtor’s fault as a general basis of contractual liability. In this context, the author analyzes not only the Obligation Relationships Act , but also individual solutions from the Draft of the Serbian Civil Code as well as the Draft Code on Obligations and Contracts of 1969 (in Serbian: Skica za zakonik o obligacijama i ugovorima). Also, the author analyzes provisions of the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods in the context of the application of the aforementioned argumentation. After considering the positions present in the legal theory, the author concludes that the mentioned interpretation is inconsistent and based on unstable, unreliable and legally uncertain foundations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pravo i privreda\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pravo i privreda\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55836/pip_23312a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravo i privreda","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55836/pip_23312a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为一名三年级和四年级的学生,受《义务法》和《商法》两门学科教授所教的不同理论立场的启发,作者批判性地分析了合同责任是主观责任的论点,并试图回答该论点是否完全支持债务人过错作为合同责任的一般基础的结论。在此背景下,作者不仅分析了《义务关系法》,而且还分析了塞尔维亚民法典草案和1969年义务和合同法草案(塞尔维亚语:Skica za zakonik o Obligation acijama i ugovorima)中的个别解决办法。并结合上述论证的适用,对《联合国国际货物销售公约》的规定进行了分析。综合法理上的立场,笔者认为上述解释是不一致的,是建立在不稳定、不可靠和法律不确定的基础上的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kritički osvrt na tumačenje o subjektivnoj prirodi opšteg osnova ugovorne odgovornosti
Inspired by the different theoretical positions from which he was taught by the professors in the subjects of Obligation Law and Commercial Law, as a student of the third and fourth year of studies, the author critically analyzes the argumentation according to which contractual liability is a subjective one and tries to answer the question of whether that argumentation fully supports the conclusion of debtor’s fault as a general basis of contractual liability. In this context, the author analyzes not only the Obligation Relationships Act , but also individual solutions from the Draft of the Serbian Civil Code as well as the Draft Code on Obligations and Contracts of 1969 (in Serbian: Skica za zakonik o obligacijama i ugovorima). Also, the author analyzes provisions of the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods in the context of the application of the aforementioned argumentation. After considering the positions present in the legal theory, the author concludes that the mentioned interpretation is inconsistent and based on unstable, unreliable and legally uncertain foundations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信