瘟疫标记:门和疾病

IF 0.2 Q2 HISTORY
Edward Brookes
{"title":"瘟疫标记:门和疾病","authors":"Edward Brookes","doi":"10.3366/cult.2023.0285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout history marking the home has often been used to convey urgent information about the ‘health’ of its inhabitants. These strategies frequently target the door or entrance to the household, as it presents a porous boundary between public and private spheres. This chapter engages with several historical examples that examine how the door has been marked during periods of ‘death’ and ‘disease’ in order to prevent further spread of contagion. Specifically, it explores the use of the Plague Cross during the Great Plague of London in 1665, which became a means to regulate the movement of the infected. This is compared with modern-day forms of inscribing the door and how ‘Plague Markings’ have re-emerged in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The discussion considers that while these forms of inscription often serve valuable public health functions, they are also embroiled in a distinct politics of regulation. In many cases, marking sites of ‘contamination’ facilitates the categorisation of the ‘Other’ which defines who and what is able to enter society. Inscribing the door thus becomes an act of ‘the powerful’, signalling who is able to exert control over the body and the threshold.","PeriodicalId":41779,"journal":{"name":"Cultural History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plague Markings: Doors and Disease\",\"authors\":\"Edward Brookes\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/cult.2023.0285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Throughout history marking the home has often been used to convey urgent information about the ‘health’ of its inhabitants. These strategies frequently target the door or entrance to the household, as it presents a porous boundary between public and private spheres. This chapter engages with several historical examples that examine how the door has been marked during periods of ‘death’ and ‘disease’ in order to prevent further spread of contagion. Specifically, it explores the use of the Plague Cross during the Great Plague of London in 1665, which became a means to regulate the movement of the infected. This is compared with modern-day forms of inscribing the door and how ‘Plague Markings’ have re-emerged in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The discussion considers that while these forms of inscription often serve valuable public health functions, they are also embroiled in a distinct politics of regulation. In many cases, marking sites of ‘contamination’ facilitates the categorisation of the ‘Other’ which defines who and what is able to enter society. Inscribing the door thus becomes an act of ‘the powerful’, signalling who is able to exert control over the body and the threshold.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/cult.2023.0285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/cult.2023.0285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纵观历史,房屋的标志经常被用来传达关于其居民“健康”的紧急信息。这些策略通常针对家庭的门或入口,因为它在公共和私人领域之间呈现出多孔的边界。本章涉及几个历史例子,这些例子研究了在“死亡”和“疾病”时期如何标记门,以防止传染病的进一步传播。具体来说,它探讨了1665年伦敦大瘟疫期间鼠疫十字架的使用,它成为了一种调节感染者运动的手段。这与现代形式的门上铭文以及“瘟疫标记”如何在COVID-19大流行之后重新出现进行了比较。讨论认为,虽然这些形式的铭文往往具有宝贵的公共卫生功能,但它们也卷入了一种独特的监管政治。在许多情况下,标记“污染”地点有助于对“他者”进行分类,这定义了谁和什么能够进入社会。因此,在门上刻字成为一种“强者”的行为,表明谁能够控制身体和门槛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Plague Markings: Doors and Disease
Throughout history marking the home has often been used to convey urgent information about the ‘health’ of its inhabitants. These strategies frequently target the door or entrance to the household, as it presents a porous boundary between public and private spheres. This chapter engages with several historical examples that examine how the door has been marked during periods of ‘death’ and ‘disease’ in order to prevent further spread of contagion. Specifically, it explores the use of the Plague Cross during the Great Plague of London in 1665, which became a means to regulate the movement of the infected. This is compared with modern-day forms of inscribing the door and how ‘Plague Markings’ have re-emerged in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The discussion considers that while these forms of inscription often serve valuable public health functions, they are also embroiled in a distinct politics of regulation. In many cases, marking sites of ‘contamination’ facilitates the categorisation of the ‘Other’ which defines who and what is able to enter society. Inscribing the door thus becomes an act of ‘the powerful’, signalling who is able to exert control over the body and the threshold.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cultural History
Cultural History HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信