体外生命支持组织国际成人ECMO课程的发展:通过修改德尔菲法创建初始学习目标

Jenelle Badulak MD , Jonah Rubin MD , Elizabeth Moore BSN, RN, MBA , Matthew Cunningham PhD , Jonathan S. Ilgen MD, PhD , Başak Çoruh MD , Bishoy Zakhary MD
{"title":"体外生命支持组织国际成人ECMO课程的发展:通过修改德尔菲法创建初始学习目标","authors":"Jenelle Badulak MD ,&nbsp;Jonah Rubin MD ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Moore BSN, RN, MBA ,&nbsp;Matthew Cunningham PhD ,&nbsp;Jonathan S. Ilgen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Başak Çoruh MD ,&nbsp;Bishoy Zakhary MD","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2023.100026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>No international consensus exists for standardized learning objectives (LOs) for curricular development nor certification to recognize clinical qualifications for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>Could consensus on LOs for an international ECMO curriculum and examination be reached?</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><p>A modified four-phase Delphi consensus study with 12 international experts aimed to identify comprehensive LOs for curriculum development and high-priority objectives for an examination. In three phases, experts rated the relative importance of objectives using a web-based survey instrument with a four-point Likert scale and opportunities for free-text commentary. In the final phase, experts could agree or disagree with the final product.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All 12 invited experts agreed to participate. An initial set of 64 proposed LOs based on prior ECMO courses was submitted. In phase 1, the experts added, removed, or modified the LOs. Fifty-three LOs with a Likert score of ≥ 3.0 were identified as being of moderate or high importance. In phase 2, experts identified 29 LOs to emphasize on examinations. In phase 3, experts voted on the final list of comprehensive and high-priority LOs and suggested modifications. In phase 4, experts voted to finalize the list generated from phase 3. With 100% consensus in the final phase, we identified 53 LOs of at least moderate importance for inclusion in curricula and 32 of high priority for inclusion in an examination.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>A consensus was reached regarding the initial LOs for an international ECMO curriculum and examination, contributing to the creation of the first international certification program developed by the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO), the ELSO Adult ECMO Certification. This process paves the way for unified efforts around global ECMO course development and practitioner assessment. This also may strengthen efforts to standardize worldwide ECMO training expectations and practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":"1 3","pages":"Article 100026"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788423000266/pdfft?md5=e02829b26d95f7801c8bb1a1b0c2e3ff&pid=1-s2.0-S2949788423000266-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization International Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Curriculum\",\"authors\":\"Jenelle Badulak MD ,&nbsp;Jonah Rubin MD ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Moore BSN, RN, MBA ,&nbsp;Matthew Cunningham PhD ,&nbsp;Jonathan S. Ilgen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Başak Çoruh MD ,&nbsp;Bishoy Zakhary MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chstcc.2023.100026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>No international consensus exists for standardized learning objectives (LOs) for curricular development nor certification to recognize clinical qualifications for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>Could consensus on LOs for an international ECMO curriculum and examination be reached?</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><p>A modified four-phase Delphi consensus study with 12 international experts aimed to identify comprehensive LOs for curriculum development and high-priority objectives for an examination. In three phases, experts rated the relative importance of objectives using a web-based survey instrument with a four-point Likert scale and opportunities for free-text commentary. In the final phase, experts could agree or disagree with the final product.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All 12 invited experts agreed to participate. An initial set of 64 proposed LOs based on prior ECMO courses was submitted. In phase 1, the experts added, removed, or modified the LOs. Fifty-three LOs with a Likert score of ≥ 3.0 were identified as being of moderate or high importance. In phase 2, experts identified 29 LOs to emphasize on examinations. In phase 3, experts voted on the final list of comprehensive and high-priority LOs and suggested modifications. In phase 4, experts voted to finalize the list generated from phase 3. With 100% consensus in the final phase, we identified 53 LOs of at least moderate importance for inclusion in curricula and 32 of high priority for inclusion in an examination.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>A consensus was reached regarding the initial LOs for an international ECMO curriculum and examination, contributing to the creation of the first international certification program developed by the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO), the ELSO Adult ECMO Certification. This process paves the way for unified efforts around global ECMO course development and practitioner assessment. This also may strengthen efforts to standardize worldwide ECMO training expectations and practices.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHEST critical care\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788423000266/pdfft?md5=e02829b26d95f7801c8bb1a1b0c2e3ff&pid=1-s2.0-S2949788423000266-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHEST critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788423000266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788423000266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于课程发展的标准化学习目标(LOs)和体外膜氧合(ECMO)临床资格的认证,目前还没有国际共识。研究问题:是否可以就国际ECMO课程和考试的LOs达成共识?研究设计和方法一项由12位国际专家参与的修改后的四阶段德尔菲共识研究旨在确定课程开发的综合LOs和考试的高优先级目标。在三个阶段中,专家们使用基于网络的调查工具,使用李克特量表和自由文本评论的机会,对目标的相对重要性进行评级。在最后阶段,专家可以同意或不同意最终产品。结果12位受邀专家均同意参加。根据先前的ECMO课程,提交了一套最初的64个拟议LOs。在第一阶段,专家们添加、移除或修改LOs。53例李克特评分≥3.0的LOs被确定为中度或高度重要。在第二阶段,专家们确定了29个LOs,以强调检查。在第三阶段,专家们对全面和高度优先的LOs的最终清单进行投票,并提出修改建议。在第四阶段,专家们投票确定了第三阶段产生的名单。在最后阶段,我们达成了100%的共识,确定了53个LOs对于纳入课程至少具有中等重要性,32个对于纳入考试具有高优先级。关于国际ECMO课程和考试的初始LOs达成了共识,这有助于创建由体外生命支持组织(ELSO)开发的第一个国际认证项目,即ELSO成人ECMO认证。这一过程为围绕全球ECMO课程开发和从业者评估的统一努力铺平了道路。这也可能加强标准化全球ECMO培训期望和实践的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization International Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Curriculum

Background

No international consensus exists for standardized learning objectives (LOs) for curricular development nor certification to recognize clinical qualifications for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

Research Question

Could consensus on LOs for an international ECMO curriculum and examination be reached?

Study Design and Methods

A modified four-phase Delphi consensus study with 12 international experts aimed to identify comprehensive LOs for curriculum development and high-priority objectives for an examination. In three phases, experts rated the relative importance of objectives using a web-based survey instrument with a four-point Likert scale and opportunities for free-text commentary. In the final phase, experts could agree or disagree with the final product.

Results

All 12 invited experts agreed to participate. An initial set of 64 proposed LOs based on prior ECMO courses was submitted. In phase 1, the experts added, removed, or modified the LOs. Fifty-three LOs with a Likert score of ≥ 3.0 were identified as being of moderate or high importance. In phase 2, experts identified 29 LOs to emphasize on examinations. In phase 3, experts voted on the final list of comprehensive and high-priority LOs and suggested modifications. In phase 4, experts voted to finalize the list generated from phase 3. With 100% consensus in the final phase, we identified 53 LOs of at least moderate importance for inclusion in curricula and 32 of high priority for inclusion in an examination.

Interpretation

A consensus was reached regarding the initial LOs for an international ECMO curriculum and examination, contributing to the creation of the first international certification program developed by the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO), the ELSO Adult ECMO Certification. This process paves the way for unified efforts around global ECMO course development and practitioner assessment. This also may strengthen efforts to standardize worldwide ECMO training expectations and practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CHEST critical care
CHEST critical care Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信