现实主义审判的奇怪案例:方法论矛盾修饰法还是独角兽?

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Steffen Bohni Nielsen, Sofie Østergaard Jaspers, Sebastian Lemire
{"title":"现实主义审判的奇怪案例:方法论矛盾修饰法还是独角兽?","authors":"Steffen Bohni Nielsen, Sofie Østergaard Jaspers, Sebastian Lemire","doi":"10.1177/13563890231200291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Realist evaluation and experimental designs are both well-established approaches to evaluation. Over the past 10 years, realist trials—evaluations purposefully combining realist evaluation and experimental designs—have emerged. Informed by a comprehensive review of published realist trials, this article examines to what extent and how realist trials align with quality standards for realist evaluations and randomized controlled trials and to what extent and how the realist and trial aspects of realist trials are integrated. We identified only few examples that met high-quality standards for both experimental and realist studies and that merged the two designs.","PeriodicalId":47511,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The curious case of the realist trial: Methodological oxymoron or unicorn?\",\"authors\":\"Steffen Bohni Nielsen, Sofie Østergaard Jaspers, Sebastian Lemire\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13563890231200291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Realist evaluation and experimental designs are both well-established approaches to evaluation. Over the past 10 years, realist trials—evaluations purposefully combining realist evaluation and experimental designs—have emerged. Informed by a comprehensive review of published realist trials, this article examines to what extent and how realist trials align with quality standards for realist evaluations and randomized controlled trials and to what extent and how the realist and trial aspects of realist trials are integrated. We identified only few examples that met high-quality standards for both experimental and realist studies and that merged the two designs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890231200291\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890231200291","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现实评价和实验设计都是公认的评价方法。在过去的10年里,现实主义试验——有目的地将现实主义评估和实验设计结合起来的评估——已经出现。通过对已发表的现实主义试验的全面回顾,本文研究了现实主义试验在多大程度上以及如何与现实主义评估和随机对照试验的质量标准保持一致,以及在多大程度上以及如何整合现实主义试验的现实主义和试验方面。我们只确定了几个符合实验和现实研究的高质量标准的例子,并将两种设计合并在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The curious case of the realist trial: Methodological oxymoron or unicorn?
Realist evaluation and experimental designs are both well-established approaches to evaluation. Over the past 10 years, realist trials—evaluations purposefully combining realist evaluation and experimental designs—have emerged. Informed by a comprehensive review of published realist trials, this article examines to what extent and how realist trials align with quality standards for realist evaluations and randomized controlled trials and to what extent and how the realist and trial aspects of realist trials are integrated. We identified only few examples that met high-quality standards for both experimental and realist studies and that merged the two designs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation
Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信