“形象的背叛”:个人意志与个人意志宣言之间的故意差异

Alexander Y. Zezekalo
{"title":"“形象的背叛”:个人意志与个人意志宣言之间的故意差异","authors":"Alexander Y. Zezekalo","doi":"10.21638/spbu25.2023.304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper is intended to pursue the old issue of the underlying basis of contracts as well as legal transactions on the whole. The main idea is, consequently, to explore, using example of vices of will caused by intentional discrepancy between the internal will and its declaration, which theoretical pattern should be applied to the legislative regulation, which is in force nowadays first of all within the civil law legal space. In particular, with the aim of answering, in a way, the question whether it is really obvious that the dogma of the autonomy of the will here is no longer the basis of the rules of contract. Brief comparative overview demonstrates that despite the significantly different viewpoints of the doctrines as to the basis of legal transaction, and above all, a contract, many legal systems of continental Europe do take a serious account of the subjective element and proceed openly or implicitly from the necessity that the internal will should correspond to its external expression. At the same time, within the contract law, in some cases it is being spoken of consensus and its vices. However, if consensus in such cases means nothing but agreement on the parties’ intentions, we are still dealing with the same subjective approach, based to a large extent upon the central idea of the old will theory and its modifications, attaching at least considerable degree of importance to the individual will.","PeriodicalId":487551,"journal":{"name":"Правоведение","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“La Trahison des Images”: Intentional discrepancy between individual will and its declaration\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Y. Zezekalo\",\"doi\":\"10.21638/spbu25.2023.304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper is intended to pursue the old issue of the underlying basis of contracts as well as legal transactions on the whole. The main idea is, consequently, to explore, using example of vices of will caused by intentional discrepancy between the internal will and its declaration, which theoretical pattern should be applied to the legislative regulation, which is in force nowadays first of all within the civil law legal space. In particular, with the aim of answering, in a way, the question whether it is really obvious that the dogma of the autonomy of the will here is no longer the basis of the rules of contract. Brief comparative overview demonstrates that despite the significantly different viewpoints of the doctrines as to the basis of legal transaction, and above all, a contract, many legal systems of continental Europe do take a serious account of the subjective element and proceed openly or implicitly from the necessity that the internal will should correspond to its external expression. At the same time, within the contract law, in some cases it is being spoken of consensus and its vices. However, if consensus in such cases means nothing but agreement on the parties’ intentions, we are still dealing with the same subjective approach, based to a large extent upon the central idea of the old will theory and its modifications, attaching at least considerable degree of importance to the individual will.\",\"PeriodicalId\":487551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Правоведение\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Правоведение\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2023.304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Правоведение","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2023.304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在从整体上探讨合同和法律交易的基本基础这一老问题。因此,本文的主要思想是,首先以大陆法系的法律空间为例,以内部意志与声明意志的故意不符所导致的意志之恶为例,探讨在现行的立法规制中应采用何种理论模式。特别是,在某种程度上,为了回答这个问题,是否真的很明显,意志自治的教条不再是契约规则的基础。简要的比较概述表明,尽管关于法律交易的基础,尤其是关于合同的基础的学说有显著不同的观点,但欧洲大陆的许多法律体系确实认真考虑了主观因素,并公开或隐含地从内部意志应与其外部表达相对应的必要性出发。与此同时,在合同法中,在某些情况下,它被谈到共识及其缺点。然而,如果在这种情况下,协商一致仅仅意味着对当事人的意图达成一致,那么我们仍然在处理同样的主观方法,这种方法在很大程度上基于旧意志理论及其修正的中心思想,至少相当程度地重视个人意志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“La Trahison des Images”: Intentional discrepancy between individual will and its declaration
The paper is intended to pursue the old issue of the underlying basis of contracts as well as legal transactions on the whole. The main idea is, consequently, to explore, using example of vices of will caused by intentional discrepancy between the internal will and its declaration, which theoretical pattern should be applied to the legislative regulation, which is in force nowadays first of all within the civil law legal space. In particular, with the aim of answering, in a way, the question whether it is really obvious that the dogma of the autonomy of the will here is no longer the basis of the rules of contract. Brief comparative overview demonstrates that despite the significantly different viewpoints of the doctrines as to the basis of legal transaction, and above all, a contract, many legal systems of continental Europe do take a serious account of the subjective element and proceed openly or implicitly from the necessity that the internal will should correspond to its external expression. At the same time, within the contract law, in some cases it is being spoken of consensus and its vices. However, if consensus in such cases means nothing but agreement on the parties’ intentions, we are still dealing with the same subjective approach, based to a large extent upon the central idea of the old will theory and its modifications, attaching at least considerable degree of importance to the individual will.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信