尼亚美国立医院糖尿病足溃疡分离细菌的细菌学特征和抗生素敏感性

Abdoulaye Ousmane, Sanda Souley, Biraima Ahamadou, Moumouni Aziz, Harouna Laouali, Guiet Fatima, Maman dou, Sidi Boukar, Laouli Boubou, Tapsoba ois
{"title":"尼亚美国立医院糖尿病足溃疡分离细菌的细菌学特征和抗生素敏感性","authors":"Abdoulaye Ousmane, Sanda Souley, Biraima Ahamadou, Moumouni Aziz, Harouna Laouali, Guiet Fatima, Maman dou, Sidi Boukar, Laouli Boubou, Tapsoba ois","doi":"10.5455/jmid.2023.v13.i3.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of our work was to determine the bacteriological profile and antibiotic sensitivity of bacteria isolated from diabetic foot wounds. Methods: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study from July 1 to December 31, 2020. During this period, all diabetic patients with wounds were sampled. The different samples were plated on appropriate media. The identification of the isolated bacterial strains as well as the study of their sensitivity to antibiotics was performed according to conventional methods. Results: A total of 689 diabetic patients were followed during this period, 58 (8.41%) had infected foot wounds. The average age was 53.6 years with a sex ratio (M/F) of 1.15. Bacteriological analyses allowed the isolation of 48 bacterial strains (10 different species) with a predominance of Staphylococcus aureus (35.42%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (20.84%), Escherichia coli (12.50%), Enterobacter aerogenes (10.42%). We observed a predominance of Gram-negative bacilli (56.25%). The sensitivity tests performed on the identified bacteria showed that 100% of the enterobacteria strains were sensitive to Ertapenem and Imipenem, except for Proteus mirabilis. Four strains were tested for extended-spectrum betalactamase (ESBL) and none were producers. All Gram positive cocci isolates were sensitive to vancomycin and resistant to penicillin G. Staphylococcus aureus strains were sensitive to erythromycin (82.35%), Kanamycin (82.35%) and Oxacillin (82.35%). Conclusion: These results show that diabetic foot wound infections are becoming more frequent. It is necessary to manage them with adequate antibiotic therapy based on an antibiogram to avoid the spread of multi-resistant bacterial strains.","PeriodicalId":16603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacteriological profile and antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria isolated from diabetic foot ulcers at the National Hospital of Niamey\",\"authors\":\"Abdoulaye Ousmane, Sanda Souley, Biraima Ahamadou, Moumouni Aziz, Harouna Laouali, Guiet Fatima, Maman dou, Sidi Boukar, Laouli Boubou, Tapsoba ois\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/jmid.2023.v13.i3.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The objective of our work was to determine the bacteriological profile and antibiotic sensitivity of bacteria isolated from diabetic foot wounds. Methods: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study from July 1 to December 31, 2020. During this period, all diabetic patients with wounds were sampled. The different samples were plated on appropriate media. The identification of the isolated bacterial strains as well as the study of their sensitivity to antibiotics was performed according to conventional methods. Results: A total of 689 diabetic patients were followed during this period, 58 (8.41%) had infected foot wounds. The average age was 53.6 years with a sex ratio (M/F) of 1.15. Bacteriological analyses allowed the isolation of 48 bacterial strains (10 different species) with a predominance of Staphylococcus aureus (35.42%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (20.84%), Escherichia coli (12.50%), Enterobacter aerogenes (10.42%). We observed a predominance of Gram-negative bacilli (56.25%). The sensitivity tests performed on the identified bacteria showed that 100% of the enterobacteria strains were sensitive to Ertapenem and Imipenem, except for Proteus mirabilis. Four strains were tested for extended-spectrum betalactamase (ESBL) and none were producers. All Gram positive cocci isolates were sensitive to vancomycin and resistant to penicillin G. Staphylococcus aureus strains were sensitive to erythromycin (82.35%), Kanamycin (82.35%) and Oxacillin (82.35%). Conclusion: These results show that diabetic foot wound infections are becoming more frequent. It is necessary to manage them with adequate antibiotic therapy based on an antibiogram to avoid the spread of multi-resistant bacterial strains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/jmid.2023.v13.i3.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jmid.2023.v13.i3.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究糖尿病足部创面分离细菌的细菌学特征和抗生素敏感性。方法:我们于2020年7月1日至12月31日进行了描述性横断面研究。在此期间,对所有有伤口的糖尿病患者进行采样。将不同的样品镀在合适的培养基上。按照常规方法对分离菌株进行鉴定和抗生素敏感性研究。结果:随访689例糖尿病患者,其中足部感染58例(8.41%)。平均年龄为53.6岁,性别比为1.15。细菌学分析共检出48株细菌(10种),以金黄色葡萄球菌(35.42%)为主,其次为肺炎克雷伯菌(20.84%)、大肠杆菌(12.50%)、产气肠杆菌(10.42%)。革兰氏阴性杆菌占优势(56.25%)。结果表明,除奇异变形杆菌外,其余肠杆菌对厄他培南和亚胺培南均敏感。4株菌株检测到广谱β -内酰胺酶(ESBL),均无产生菌。所有革兰氏阳性球菌对万古霉素敏感,对青霉素耐药。金黄色葡萄球菌对红霉素(82.35%)、卡那霉素(82.35%)和奥西林(82.35%)敏感。结论:糖尿病足部感染呈上升趋势。有必要根据抗生素谱对其进行适当的抗生素治疗,以避免多重耐药菌株的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bacteriological profile and antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria isolated from diabetic foot ulcers at the National Hospital of Niamey
Objective: The objective of our work was to determine the bacteriological profile and antibiotic sensitivity of bacteria isolated from diabetic foot wounds. Methods: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study from July 1 to December 31, 2020. During this period, all diabetic patients with wounds were sampled. The different samples were plated on appropriate media. The identification of the isolated bacterial strains as well as the study of their sensitivity to antibiotics was performed according to conventional methods. Results: A total of 689 diabetic patients were followed during this period, 58 (8.41%) had infected foot wounds. The average age was 53.6 years with a sex ratio (M/F) of 1.15. Bacteriological analyses allowed the isolation of 48 bacterial strains (10 different species) with a predominance of Staphylococcus aureus (35.42%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (20.84%), Escherichia coli (12.50%), Enterobacter aerogenes (10.42%). We observed a predominance of Gram-negative bacilli (56.25%). The sensitivity tests performed on the identified bacteria showed that 100% of the enterobacteria strains were sensitive to Ertapenem and Imipenem, except for Proteus mirabilis. Four strains were tested for extended-spectrum betalactamase (ESBL) and none were producers. All Gram positive cocci isolates were sensitive to vancomycin and resistant to penicillin G. Staphylococcus aureus strains were sensitive to erythromycin (82.35%), Kanamycin (82.35%) and Oxacillin (82.35%). Conclusion: These results show that diabetic foot wound infections are becoming more frequent. It is necessary to manage them with adequate antibiotic therapy based on an antibiogram to avoid the spread of multi-resistant bacterial strains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信