微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MI-TLIF)

IF 1 Q3 SURGERY
Stephen Saela, Michael Pompliano, Jeffrey Varghese, Kumar Sinha, Michael Faloon, Arash Emami
{"title":"微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MI-TLIF)","authors":"Stephen Saela, Michael Pompliano, Jeffrey Varghese, Kumar Sinha, Michael Faloon, Arash Emami","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.st.21.00065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) has been established as an excellent alternative to the traditional open approach for the treatment of degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine 1–3 . Description: The procedure is performed with the patient under general anesthesia and on a radiolucent table in order to allow for intraoperative fluoroscopy. The procedure is performed through small incisions made over the vertebral levels of interest, typically utilizing either a fixed or expandable type of tubular dilator, which is eventually seated against the facet joint complex 4 . A laminectomy and/or facetectomy is performed in order to expose the disc space, and the ipsilateral neural elements are visualized 5 . The end plates are prepared, and an interbody device is placed after the disc is removed. Pedicle screws and rods are then placed for posterior fixation. Alternatives: Nonoperative alternatives include physical therapy and corticosteroid injections. Other operative techniques include open TLIF or other types of lumbar fusion approaches, such as posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), anterior lumbar interbody fusion, lateral or extreme lateral interbody fusion, or oblique lumbar interbody fusion. Rationale: Open TLIF was developed in order to obtain a more lateral approach to the lumbar disc space than was previously possible with PLIF. The goal of this was to minimize the amount of thecal-sac and nerve-root retraction required during PLIF 4 . Additionally, as the number of patients who required revision after PLIF increased, the need arose for an approach to the lumbar spine that circumvented the posterior midline scarring from previous PLIF surgical sites 6 . MI-TLIF was introduced to reduce the approach-related paraspinal muscle damage of open TLIF 5 . Indications for MI-TLIF include most degenerative pathology of the lumbar spine, including disc herniation, low-grade spondylolisthesis, and spinal and foraminal stenosis 7 . However, MI-TLIF allows for less robust correction of deformity than other minimally invasive approaches; therefore, MI-TLIF may not be as effective in cases of substantial spinal deformity or high-grade spondylolisthesis 8 . Expected Outcomes: MI-TLIF results in significantly less blood loss, postoperative pain, and hospital length of stay compared with open TLIF 1–3 . Although some studies have suggested increased operative time for MI-TLIF 9,10 , meta-analyses have shown comparable operative times between the 2 techniques 1–3 . It is thought that the discrepancy in reported operative times is the result of a learning curve and that, once that is overcome, the difference in operative time between the 2 techniques becomes minimal 11,12 . One disadvantage of MI-TLIF that has remained constant in the literature is its increased intraoperative fluoroscopy time compared with open TLIF 3,13 . The complication rate has largely been found to be equivalent between open and MI-TLIF 1–3 or slightly lower with MI-TLIF 14 , especially in the hands of an experienced surgeon 15 . Finally, the fusion rate and improvement in patient outcome scores have also been found to be largely equivalent 1–3 . Important Tips: We suggest placing the ipsilateral pedicle screw after the interbody cage has been inserted. Fully visualize the Kambin triangle 16 prior to performing the facetectomy. Protect the exiting and traversing nerve roots by placing small cottonoids around them and retracting delicately. Bone removed during facetectomy can be utilized as autograft for the interbody cage. Avoid removing pedicle bone during decompression. If central stenosis is present, the neural decompression should be extended medial to the epidural fat so that the dura mater can be visualized all of the way to the contralateral pedicle. Perform an adequate end plate preparation prior to interbody insertion while being mindful to avoid injuring the end plate, to minimize the risk of future cage subsidence. Confirm correct placement of the interbody device on intraoperative fluoroscopy. If bone morphogenic protein is utilized, be careful not to pack too much posteriorly as this may cause nerve irritation. Acronyms and Abbreviations: TLIF = transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion MI-TLIF = minimally invasive TLIF PLIF = posterior lumbar interbody fusion ALIF = anterior lumbar interbody fusion LLIF = lateral lumbar interbody fusion XLIF = extreme lateral interbody fusion OLIF = oblique lumbar interbody fusion DLIF = direct lateral interbody fusion MRI = magnetic resonance imaging A/P = anteroposterior EMG = electromyographic BMP = bone morphogenic protein XR = x-ray (radiograph) OTC = over the counter DVT = deep vein thrombosis PE = pulmonary embolism MI = myocardial infarction MIS = minimally invasive surgery OR = operating room LOS = length of stay VAS = visual analog scale ODI = Oswestry Disability Index M-H = Mantel-Haenszel RR = risk ratio CI = confidence interval NSAIDs = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF)\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Saela, Michael Pompliano, Jeffrey Varghese, Kumar Sinha, Michael Faloon, Arash Emami\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/jbjs.st.21.00065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) has been established as an excellent alternative to the traditional open approach for the treatment of degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine 1–3 . Description: The procedure is performed with the patient under general anesthesia and on a radiolucent table in order to allow for intraoperative fluoroscopy. The procedure is performed through small incisions made over the vertebral levels of interest, typically utilizing either a fixed or expandable type of tubular dilator, which is eventually seated against the facet joint complex 4 . A laminectomy and/or facetectomy is performed in order to expose the disc space, and the ipsilateral neural elements are visualized 5 . The end plates are prepared, and an interbody device is placed after the disc is removed. Pedicle screws and rods are then placed for posterior fixation. Alternatives: Nonoperative alternatives include physical therapy and corticosteroid injections. Other operative techniques include open TLIF or other types of lumbar fusion approaches, such as posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), anterior lumbar interbody fusion, lateral or extreme lateral interbody fusion, or oblique lumbar interbody fusion. Rationale: Open TLIF was developed in order to obtain a more lateral approach to the lumbar disc space than was previously possible with PLIF. The goal of this was to minimize the amount of thecal-sac and nerve-root retraction required during PLIF 4 . Additionally, as the number of patients who required revision after PLIF increased, the need arose for an approach to the lumbar spine that circumvented the posterior midline scarring from previous PLIF surgical sites 6 . MI-TLIF was introduced to reduce the approach-related paraspinal muscle damage of open TLIF 5 . Indications for MI-TLIF include most degenerative pathology of the lumbar spine, including disc herniation, low-grade spondylolisthesis, and spinal and foraminal stenosis 7 . However, MI-TLIF allows for less robust correction of deformity than other minimally invasive approaches; therefore, MI-TLIF may not be as effective in cases of substantial spinal deformity or high-grade spondylolisthesis 8 . Expected Outcomes: MI-TLIF results in significantly less blood loss, postoperative pain, and hospital length of stay compared with open TLIF 1–3 . Although some studies have suggested increased operative time for MI-TLIF 9,10 , meta-analyses have shown comparable operative times between the 2 techniques 1–3 . It is thought that the discrepancy in reported operative times is the result of a learning curve and that, once that is overcome, the difference in operative time between the 2 techniques becomes minimal 11,12 . One disadvantage of MI-TLIF that has remained constant in the literature is its increased intraoperative fluoroscopy time compared with open TLIF 3,13 . The complication rate has largely been found to be equivalent between open and MI-TLIF 1–3 or slightly lower with MI-TLIF 14 , especially in the hands of an experienced surgeon 15 . Finally, the fusion rate and improvement in patient outcome scores have also been found to be largely equivalent 1–3 . Important Tips: We suggest placing the ipsilateral pedicle screw after the interbody cage has been inserted. Fully visualize the Kambin triangle 16 prior to performing the facetectomy. Protect the exiting and traversing nerve roots by placing small cottonoids around them and retracting delicately. Bone removed during facetectomy can be utilized as autograft for the interbody cage. Avoid removing pedicle bone during decompression. If central stenosis is present, the neural decompression should be extended medial to the epidural fat so that the dura mater can be visualized all of the way to the contralateral pedicle. Perform an adequate end plate preparation prior to interbody insertion while being mindful to avoid injuring the end plate, to minimize the risk of future cage subsidence. Confirm correct placement of the interbody device on intraoperative fluoroscopy. If bone morphogenic protein is utilized, be careful not to pack too much posteriorly as this may cause nerve irritation. Acronyms and Abbreviations: TLIF = transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion MI-TLIF = minimally invasive TLIF PLIF = posterior lumbar interbody fusion ALIF = anterior lumbar interbody fusion LLIF = lateral lumbar interbody fusion XLIF = extreme lateral interbody fusion OLIF = oblique lumbar interbody fusion DLIF = direct lateral interbody fusion MRI = magnetic resonance imaging A/P = anteroposterior EMG = electromyographic BMP = bone morphogenic protein XR = x-ray (radiograph) OTC = over the counter DVT = deep vein thrombosis PE = pulmonary embolism MI = myocardial infarction MIS = minimally invasive surgery OR = operating room LOS = length of stay VAS = visual analog scale ODI = Oswestry Disability Index M-H = Mantel-Haenszel RR = risk ratio CI = confidence interval NSAIDs = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs\",\"PeriodicalId\":44676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.st.21.00065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.st.21.00065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(mi - tliff)已被确立为传统开放入路治疗腰椎退行性疾病的绝佳选择1-3。描述:该手术是在全身麻醉下进行的,在放射光台上进行,以便术中透视。该手术通过在椎体感兴趣的水平上做小切口进行,通常使用固定或可膨胀型管状扩张器,最终固定在小关节复合体上4。行椎板切除术和/或面切除术以暴露椎间盘间隙,观察同侧神经元件5。准备端板,取出盘后放置体间装置。然后放置椎弓根螺钉和棒进行后路固定。替代方案:非手术替代方案包括物理治疗和皮质类固醇注射。其他手术技术包括开放式TLIF或其他类型的腰椎融合术,如后路腰椎椎体间融合术(PLIF)、前路腰椎椎体间融合术、外侧或极外侧椎体间融合术或斜位腰椎椎体间融合术。理由:与以前的PLIF相比,开放式TLIF的发展是为了获得更外侧的腰椎间盘间隙入路。这样做的目的是尽量减少PLIF 4期间所需的鞘囊和神经根牵伸量。此外,随着PLIF术后需要翻修的患者数量的增加,需要采用绕过先前PLIF手术部位后中线疤痕的腰椎入路6。引入MI-TLIF是为了减少开放性TLIF的入路相关棘旁肌损伤5。MI-TLIF的适应症包括大多数腰椎退行性病变,包括椎间盘突出、轻度椎体滑脱、脊柱和椎间孔狭窄7。然而,与其他微创入路相比,MI-TLIF的畸形矫正效果较差;因此,MI-TLIF在严重脊柱畸形或高度脊柱滑脱的病例中可能不那么有效8。预期结果:与开放式TLIF相比,MI-TLIF的出血量、术后疼痛和住院时间显著减少1-3。虽然一些研究建议增加MI-TLIF的手术时间9,10,但荟萃分析显示两种技术之间的手术时间相当1-3。据认为,报告的手术时间差异是学习曲线的结果,一旦克服了这一点,两种技术之间的手术时间差异就会变得最小。文献中MI-TLIF的一个缺点是术中透视时间较开放式TLIF增加3,13。在开放性和MI-TLIF 1-3之间的并发症发生率基本相当,而MI-TLIF 14的并发症发生率略低,特别是在经验丰富的外科医生手中15。最后,融合率和患者预后评分的改善也大致相同1-3。重要提示:我们建议在置入椎间保持器后再置入同侧椎弓根螺钉。在进行面部切除术之前,充分观察卡姆宾三角。在神经根周围放置小棉球,并小心地缩回,以保护其出口和穿过的神经根。在面部切除术中取出的骨可以用作体间笼的自体移植物。减压时避免取出椎弓根骨。如果存在中枢性狭窄,神经减压应延伸至硬膜外脂肪内侧,这样可以看到硬脑膜一直到对侧椎弓根。在椎体间插入前进行充分的终板准备,同时注意避免损伤终板,以尽量减少未来笼下沉的风险。术中透视检查确认椎间装置的正确放置。如果使用骨形态发生蛋白,注意不要在后部包装太多,因为这可能会引起神经刺激。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF)
Background: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) has been established as an excellent alternative to the traditional open approach for the treatment of degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine 1–3 . Description: The procedure is performed with the patient under general anesthesia and on a radiolucent table in order to allow for intraoperative fluoroscopy. The procedure is performed through small incisions made over the vertebral levels of interest, typically utilizing either a fixed or expandable type of tubular dilator, which is eventually seated against the facet joint complex 4 . A laminectomy and/or facetectomy is performed in order to expose the disc space, and the ipsilateral neural elements are visualized 5 . The end plates are prepared, and an interbody device is placed after the disc is removed. Pedicle screws and rods are then placed for posterior fixation. Alternatives: Nonoperative alternatives include physical therapy and corticosteroid injections. Other operative techniques include open TLIF or other types of lumbar fusion approaches, such as posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), anterior lumbar interbody fusion, lateral or extreme lateral interbody fusion, or oblique lumbar interbody fusion. Rationale: Open TLIF was developed in order to obtain a more lateral approach to the lumbar disc space than was previously possible with PLIF. The goal of this was to minimize the amount of thecal-sac and nerve-root retraction required during PLIF 4 . Additionally, as the number of patients who required revision after PLIF increased, the need arose for an approach to the lumbar spine that circumvented the posterior midline scarring from previous PLIF surgical sites 6 . MI-TLIF was introduced to reduce the approach-related paraspinal muscle damage of open TLIF 5 . Indications for MI-TLIF include most degenerative pathology of the lumbar spine, including disc herniation, low-grade spondylolisthesis, and spinal and foraminal stenosis 7 . However, MI-TLIF allows for less robust correction of deformity than other minimally invasive approaches; therefore, MI-TLIF may not be as effective in cases of substantial spinal deformity or high-grade spondylolisthesis 8 . Expected Outcomes: MI-TLIF results in significantly less blood loss, postoperative pain, and hospital length of stay compared with open TLIF 1–3 . Although some studies have suggested increased operative time for MI-TLIF 9,10 , meta-analyses have shown comparable operative times between the 2 techniques 1–3 . It is thought that the discrepancy in reported operative times is the result of a learning curve and that, once that is overcome, the difference in operative time between the 2 techniques becomes minimal 11,12 . One disadvantage of MI-TLIF that has remained constant in the literature is its increased intraoperative fluoroscopy time compared with open TLIF 3,13 . The complication rate has largely been found to be equivalent between open and MI-TLIF 1–3 or slightly lower with MI-TLIF 14 , especially in the hands of an experienced surgeon 15 . Finally, the fusion rate and improvement in patient outcome scores have also been found to be largely equivalent 1–3 . Important Tips: We suggest placing the ipsilateral pedicle screw after the interbody cage has been inserted. Fully visualize the Kambin triangle 16 prior to performing the facetectomy. Protect the exiting and traversing nerve roots by placing small cottonoids around them and retracting delicately. Bone removed during facetectomy can be utilized as autograft for the interbody cage. Avoid removing pedicle bone during decompression. If central stenosis is present, the neural decompression should be extended medial to the epidural fat so that the dura mater can be visualized all of the way to the contralateral pedicle. Perform an adequate end plate preparation prior to interbody insertion while being mindful to avoid injuring the end plate, to minimize the risk of future cage subsidence. Confirm correct placement of the interbody device on intraoperative fluoroscopy. If bone morphogenic protein is utilized, be careful not to pack too much posteriorly as this may cause nerve irritation. Acronyms and Abbreviations: TLIF = transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion MI-TLIF = minimally invasive TLIF PLIF = posterior lumbar interbody fusion ALIF = anterior lumbar interbody fusion LLIF = lateral lumbar interbody fusion XLIF = extreme lateral interbody fusion OLIF = oblique lumbar interbody fusion DLIF = direct lateral interbody fusion MRI = magnetic resonance imaging A/P = anteroposterior EMG = electromyographic BMP = bone morphogenic protein XR = x-ray (radiograph) OTC = over the counter DVT = deep vein thrombosis PE = pulmonary embolism MI = myocardial infarction MIS = minimally invasive surgery OR = operating room LOS = length of stay VAS = visual analog scale ODI = Oswestry Disability Index M-H = Mantel-Haenszel RR = risk ratio CI = confidence interval NSAIDs = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques (JBJS EST) is the premier journal describing how to perform orthopaedic surgical procedures, verified by evidence-based outcomes, vetted by peer review, while utilizing online delivery, imagery and video to optimize the educational experience, thereby enhancing patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信