具有可证明安全参数的标准化椭圆曲线更有效的两轮多重签名方案

IF 0.4 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Kaoru TAKEMURE, Yusuke SAKAI, Bagus SANTOSO, Goichiro HANAOKA, Kazuo OHTA
{"title":"具有可证明安全参数的标准化椭圆曲线更有效的两轮多重签名方案","authors":"Kaoru TAKEMURE, Yusuke SAKAI, Bagus SANTOSO, Goichiro HANAOKA, Kazuo OHTA","doi":"10.1587/transfun.2023eap1045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existing discrete-logarithm-based two-round multi-signature schemes without using the idealized model, i.e., the Algebraic Group Model (AGM), have quite large reduction loss. This means that an implementation of these schemes requires an elliptic curve (EC) with a very large order for the standard 128-bit security when we consider concrete security. Indeed, the existing standardized ECs have orders too small to ensure 128-bit security of such schemes. Recently, Pan and Wagner proposed two two-round schemes based on the Decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption (EUROCRYPT 2023). For 128-bit security in concrete security, the first scheme can use the NIST-standardized EC P-256 and the second can use P-384. However, with these parameter choices, they do not improve the signature size and the communication complexity over the existing non-tight schemes. Therefore, there is no two-round scheme that (i) can use a standardized EC for 128-bit security and (ii) has high efficiency.","PeriodicalId":55003,"journal":{"name":"Ieice Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More Efficient Two-Round Multi-Signature Scheme with Provably Secure Parameters for Standardized Elliptic Curves\",\"authors\":\"Kaoru TAKEMURE, Yusuke SAKAI, Bagus SANTOSO, Goichiro HANAOKA, Kazuo OHTA\",\"doi\":\"10.1587/transfun.2023eap1045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The existing discrete-logarithm-based two-round multi-signature schemes without using the idealized model, i.e., the Algebraic Group Model (AGM), have quite large reduction loss. This means that an implementation of these schemes requires an elliptic curve (EC) with a very large order for the standard 128-bit security when we consider concrete security. Indeed, the existing standardized ECs have orders too small to ensure 128-bit security of such schemes. Recently, Pan and Wagner proposed two two-round schemes based on the Decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption (EUROCRYPT 2023). For 128-bit security in concrete security, the first scheme can use the NIST-standardized EC P-256 and the second can use P-384. However, with these parameter choices, they do not improve the signature size and the communication complexity over the existing non-tight schemes. Therefore, there is no two-round scheme that (i) can use a standardized EC for 128-bit security and (ii) has high efficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ieice Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ieice Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1587/transfun.2023eap1045\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ieice Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1587/transfun.2023eap1045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

现有的基于离散对数的两轮多重签名方案没有使用理想模型,即代数群模型(AGM),具有相当大的约简损失。这意味着当我们考虑具体安全性时,这些方案的实现需要具有非常大阶的标准128位安全性的椭圆曲线(EC)。事实上,现有的标准化ec的指令太小,无法保证此类方案的128位安全性。最近,Pan和Wagner提出了基于decision Diffie-Hellman (DDH)假设的两轮方案(EUROCRYPT 2023)。对于具体安全中的128位安全,第一种方案可以使用nist标准化的EC P-256,第二种方案可以使用P-384。然而,这些参数的选择并没有提高现有非紧密方案的签名大小和通信复杂度。因此,没有两轮方案(i)可以使用标准化的EC来实现128位安全性,(ii)具有很高的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
More Efficient Two-Round Multi-Signature Scheme with Provably Secure Parameters for Standardized Elliptic Curves
The existing discrete-logarithm-based two-round multi-signature schemes without using the idealized model, i.e., the Algebraic Group Model (AGM), have quite large reduction loss. This means that an implementation of these schemes requires an elliptic curve (EC) with a very large order for the standard 128-bit security when we consider concrete security. Indeed, the existing standardized ECs have orders too small to ensure 128-bit security of such schemes. Recently, Pan and Wagner proposed two two-round schemes based on the Decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption (EUROCRYPT 2023). For 128-bit security in concrete security, the first scheme can use the NIST-standardized EC P-256 and the second can use P-384. However, with these parameter choices, they do not improve the signature size and the communication complexity over the existing non-tight schemes. Therefore, there is no two-round scheme that (i) can use a standardized EC for 128-bit security and (ii) has high efficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: Includes reports on research, developments, and examinations performed by the Society''s members for the specific fields shown in the category list such as detailed below, the contents of which may advance the development of science and industry: (1) Reports on new theories, experiments with new contents, or extensions of and supplements to conventional theories and experiments. (2) Reports on development of measurement technology and various applied technologies. (3) Reports on the planning, design, manufacture, testing, or operation of facilities, machinery, parts, materials, etc. (4) Presentation of new methods, suggestion of new angles, ideas, systematization, software, or any new facts regarding the above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信