Hamid Kayalha, Mohammad Movahed, Asghar Karbord, Ali Alizadeh
{"title":"0.5%布比卡因加咪达唑仑对单侧腹股沟疝手术脊髓麻醉时间的影响","authors":"Hamid Kayalha, Mohammad Movahed, Asghar Karbord, Ali Alizadeh","doi":"10.61440/jcrcs.2023.v1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Inguinal hernia is the most common type of abdominal hernia which is 7 times more common in men than women. Surgical treatment is performed under general or local anesthesia (spinal or epidural). Neuraxial anesthesia has a greater advantage than general anesthesia. Today, spinal block anesthetics with local drug anesthetics along with adjuvant drugs is widely used for surgery. Midazolam is one of these adjuvants whose spinal injection, in addition to its appropriate analgesic effect, enhances the effect of local anesthetics. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of intrathecal midazolam (1 mg) to bupivacaine (0.5%) on the quality and timing of sensory block, motor block and hemodynamic changes during of inguinal herniation surgery. Materials and Methods: 64 patients with ASAI / II criteria (30-70 years old) were randomly divided into two groups of 32 patients under spinal anesthesia for inguinal herniation surgery. The anesthesiologist and the patient did not know the status of the studied drugs. Group 1 received 0.5 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 0.2 ml of normal saline and group 2 received 3 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 0.2 ml of midazolam (1 mg). The return time of sensory block and the return time of motor block, the time of the first request for analgesics, the degree of satisfaction and the hemodynamic status were compared between these group. Results: The return time of sensory block in group 1 was 124.81 ± 16.15 minutes and in group 2 was 193.18± 34.53 minutes, which was statistically significant and in group 2 the return time of sensory block was longer (001 ≤. ˂P). reaction block return time: in group 2: (140.43 ± 27.46) minutes, group: 1 (107.78 ± 13.82) minutes were shorter and statistically significant (P≤ .001). The time of the first analgesic request by patients in group 1 was 157.87 ±16.32 minutes and in group 2, 264.59 ± 50.17 minutes, which was statistically significant (P ≤ .001). Satisfaction index and hemodynamic changes were not significant between groups (P ˃ 0.05). Conclusion: Addition of 1 mg of midazolam in spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine 0.5% increased of the duration of analgesia and the time of first request for analgesia without changing the hemodynamic status in patients with inguinal herniation surgery.","PeriodicalId":472378,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Research and Case Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Adding Midazolam to Bupivacaine (0.5%) on the Duration of Spinal Anesthesia in Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Hamid Kayalha, Mohammad Movahed, Asghar Karbord, Ali Alizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.61440/jcrcs.2023.v1.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Inguinal hernia is the most common type of abdominal hernia which is 7 times more common in men than women. Surgical treatment is performed under general or local anesthesia (spinal or epidural). Neuraxial anesthesia has a greater advantage than general anesthesia. Today, spinal block anesthetics with local drug anesthetics along with adjuvant drugs is widely used for surgery. Midazolam is one of these adjuvants whose spinal injection, in addition to its appropriate analgesic effect, enhances the effect of local anesthetics. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of intrathecal midazolam (1 mg) to bupivacaine (0.5%) on the quality and timing of sensory block, motor block and hemodynamic changes during of inguinal herniation surgery. Materials and Methods: 64 patients with ASAI / II criteria (30-70 years old) were randomly divided into two groups of 32 patients under spinal anesthesia for inguinal herniation surgery. The anesthesiologist and the patient did not know the status of the studied drugs. Group 1 received 0.5 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 0.2 ml of normal saline and group 2 received 3 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 0.2 ml of midazolam (1 mg). The return time of sensory block and the return time of motor block, the time of the first request for analgesics, the degree of satisfaction and the hemodynamic status were compared between these group. Results: The return time of sensory block in group 1 was 124.81 ± 16.15 minutes and in group 2 was 193.18± 34.53 minutes, which was statistically significant and in group 2 the return time of sensory block was longer (001 ≤. ˂P). reaction block return time: in group 2: (140.43 ± 27.46) minutes, group: 1 (107.78 ± 13.82) minutes were shorter and statistically significant (P≤ .001). The time of the first analgesic request by patients in group 1 was 157.87 ±16.32 minutes and in group 2, 264.59 ± 50.17 minutes, which was statistically significant (P ≤ .001). Satisfaction index and hemodynamic changes were not significant between groups (P ˃ 0.05). Conclusion: Addition of 1 mg of midazolam in spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine 0.5% increased of the duration of analgesia and the time of first request for analgesia without changing the hemodynamic status in patients with inguinal herniation surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":472378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Research and Case Studies\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Research and Case Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61440/jcrcs.2023.v1.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Research and Case Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61440/jcrcs.2023.v1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
腹股沟疝是最常见的腹疝类型,男性的发生率是女性的7倍。手术治疗在全身或局部麻醉(脊髓或硬膜外)下进行。轴突麻醉比全身麻醉有更大的优势。目前,脊髓阻滞麻醉剂与局部药物麻醉剂以及辅助药物被广泛应用于外科手术。咪达唑仑是这些佐剂之一,其脊髓注射,除了其适当的镇痛作用,增强局部麻醉剂的效果。目的:本研究的目的是确定鞘内咪达唑仑(1mg)与布比卡因(0.5%)对腹股沟疝手术过程中感觉阻滞、运动阻滞和血流动力学改变的质量和时间的影响。材料与方法:将符合ASAI / II标准的患者64例(年龄30 ~ 70岁)随机分为两组,每组32例在脊髓麻醉下行腹股沟疝手术。麻醉师和患者不知道所研究药物的状态。组1给予0.5%布比卡因0.5 ml +生理盐水0.2 ml,组2给予0.5%布比卡因3 ml +咪达唑仑0.2 ml (1 mg)。比较两组患者感觉阻滞恢复时间、运动阻滞恢复时间、首次请求镇痛药时间、满意度及血流动力学状况。结果:组1感觉阻滞恢复时间124.81±16.15 min,组2感觉阻滞恢复时间193.18±34.53 min,两组比较差异有统计学意义,且组2感觉阻滞恢复时间更长(001≤。˂P)。反应阻滞恢复时间:组2为(140.43±27.46)min,组1为(107.78±13.82)min,差异有统计学意义(P≤0.001)。组1患者首次请求镇痛时间为157.87±16.32 min,组2患者首次请求镇痛时间为264.59±50.17 min,差异有统计学意义(P≤0.001)。两组患者满意度及血流动力学变化差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:布比卡因腰麻中加入咪达唑仑1mg可使腹股沟疝手术患者的镇痛持续时间和首次请求镇痛时间增加0.5%,但不改变患者的血流动力学状态。
Efficacy of Adding Midazolam to Bupivacaine (0.5%) on the Duration of Spinal Anesthesia in Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Surgery
Introduction: Inguinal hernia is the most common type of abdominal hernia which is 7 times more common in men than women. Surgical treatment is performed under general or local anesthesia (spinal or epidural). Neuraxial anesthesia has a greater advantage than general anesthesia. Today, spinal block anesthetics with local drug anesthetics along with adjuvant drugs is widely used for surgery. Midazolam is one of these adjuvants whose spinal injection, in addition to its appropriate analgesic effect, enhances the effect of local anesthetics. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of intrathecal midazolam (1 mg) to bupivacaine (0.5%) on the quality and timing of sensory block, motor block and hemodynamic changes during of inguinal herniation surgery. Materials and Methods: 64 patients with ASAI / II criteria (30-70 years old) were randomly divided into two groups of 32 patients under spinal anesthesia for inguinal herniation surgery. The anesthesiologist and the patient did not know the status of the studied drugs. Group 1 received 0.5 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 0.2 ml of normal saline and group 2 received 3 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 0.2 ml of midazolam (1 mg). The return time of sensory block and the return time of motor block, the time of the first request for analgesics, the degree of satisfaction and the hemodynamic status were compared between these group. Results: The return time of sensory block in group 1 was 124.81 ± 16.15 minutes and in group 2 was 193.18± 34.53 minutes, which was statistically significant and in group 2 the return time of sensory block was longer (001 ≤. ˂P). reaction block return time: in group 2: (140.43 ± 27.46) minutes, group: 1 (107.78 ± 13.82) minutes were shorter and statistically significant (P≤ .001). The time of the first analgesic request by patients in group 1 was 157.87 ±16.32 minutes and in group 2, 264.59 ± 50.17 minutes, which was statistically significant (P ≤ .001). Satisfaction index and hemodynamic changes were not significant between groups (P ˃ 0.05). Conclusion: Addition of 1 mg of midazolam in spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine 0.5% increased of the duration of analgesia and the time of first request for analgesia without changing the hemodynamic status in patients with inguinal herniation surgery.