基于数学学习风格的高阶思维技能线性规划主题中学生策略能力的探索

Sabri Sabri, Suradi Suradi, Abdilla Nurul Azisah M.N.
{"title":"基于数学学习风格的高阶思维技能线性规划主题中学生策略能力的探索","authors":"Sabri Sabri, Suradi Suradi, Abdilla Nurul Azisah M.N.","doi":"10.35877/sainsmat1773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is descriptive-explorative in nature employing a mixed-method approach and aiming to know students’ strategic competence in HOTS-based linear programming topic in terms of mathematics learning styles. There were 6 subjects in grade XI in Polewali Mandar that represent each learning style-strategic competence category. The instruments were questionnaire, test, and interview guidance. The questionnaire and test scores were analyzed quantitatively whereas test answers and interview results were analyzed qualitatively. The results show that of the 58 students who answered the test, they had low strategic competence in average also lack ability in each component. Visual learners are unable to formulate problem, incorrect in representing problem and unable to solve it correctly, tend to misinterpret verbal information and to involve visual presentations. An auditory learner formulated problem, however, the auditory learners are not completely correct in representing problem and unable to solve it correctly, tend to narrate the strategy, and are the best in interpreting verbal information. Meanwhile, kinesthetic learners are unable to formulate problem, not completely correct in representing problem and unable to solve it correctly, are the best in problem representation approach, but tend to be rigid in doing the strategy.","PeriodicalId":484254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Sciences, Mathematics, and Its Education","volume":"440 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of Students’ Strategic Competence in Higher-Order Thinking Skills Based Linear Programming Topic in terms of Mathematics Learning Styles\",\"authors\":\"Sabri Sabri, Suradi Suradi, Abdilla Nurul Azisah M.N.\",\"doi\":\"10.35877/sainsmat1773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study is descriptive-explorative in nature employing a mixed-method approach and aiming to know students’ strategic competence in HOTS-based linear programming topic in terms of mathematics learning styles. There were 6 subjects in grade XI in Polewali Mandar that represent each learning style-strategic competence category. The instruments were questionnaire, test, and interview guidance. The questionnaire and test scores were analyzed quantitatively whereas test answers and interview results were analyzed qualitatively. The results show that of the 58 students who answered the test, they had low strategic competence in average also lack ability in each component. Visual learners are unable to formulate problem, incorrect in representing problem and unable to solve it correctly, tend to misinterpret verbal information and to involve visual presentations. An auditory learner formulated problem, however, the auditory learners are not completely correct in representing problem and unable to solve it correctly, tend to narrate the strategy, and are the best in interpreting verbal information. Meanwhile, kinesthetic learners are unable to formulate problem, not completely correct in representing problem and unable to solve it correctly, are the best in problem representation approach, but tend to be rigid in doing the strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":484254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Sciences, Mathematics, and Its Education\",\"volume\":\"440 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Sciences, Mathematics, and Its Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35877/sainsmat1773\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Sciences, Mathematics, and Its Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35877/sainsmat1773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用描述-探索性的混合方法,旨在了解学生在基于hots的线性规划主题的数学学习风格方面的策略能力。工具有问卷调查、测试和访谈指导。问卷和测试成绩是定量分析,而测试答案和访谈结果是定性分析。结果表明,58名应试学生的策略能力水平平均较低,且各部分能力均存在不足。视觉学习者不能表述问题,表述问题不正确,不能正确解决问题,容易误解口头信息,涉及视觉呈现。听觉学习者提出问题,但不能完全正确地表述问题,不能正确地解决问题,倾向于叙述策略,在口头信息的解释上表现最好。同时,动觉型学习者不能表述问题,不能完全正确地表征问题,不能正确地解决问题,在问题表征方法上是最好的,但在做策略上往往比较死板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploration of Students’ Strategic Competence in Higher-Order Thinking Skills Based Linear Programming Topic in terms of Mathematics Learning Styles
This study is descriptive-explorative in nature employing a mixed-method approach and aiming to know students’ strategic competence in HOTS-based linear programming topic in terms of mathematics learning styles. There were 6 subjects in grade XI in Polewali Mandar that represent each learning style-strategic competence category. The instruments were questionnaire, test, and interview guidance. The questionnaire and test scores were analyzed quantitatively whereas test answers and interview results were analyzed qualitatively. The results show that of the 58 students who answered the test, they had low strategic competence in average also lack ability in each component. Visual learners are unable to formulate problem, incorrect in representing problem and unable to solve it correctly, tend to misinterpret verbal information and to involve visual presentations. An auditory learner formulated problem, however, the auditory learners are not completely correct in representing problem and unable to solve it correctly, tend to narrate the strategy, and are the best in interpreting verbal information. Meanwhile, kinesthetic learners are unable to formulate problem, not completely correct in representing problem and unable to solve it correctly, are the best in problem representation approach, but tend to be rigid in doing the strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信