急诊气道管理与牙龈弹性鼓包手术室外:叙述性回顾

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Signa Vitae Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.22514/sv.2023.074
{"title":"急诊气道管理与牙龈弹性鼓包手术室外:叙述性回顾","authors":"","doi":"10.22514/sv.2023.074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ongoing coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has increased the need for healthcare professionals to perform emergency endotracheal intubation (ETI) in patients with COVID-19-related respiratory failure outside of the operating room. Difficult airways and severe airway-related adverse events occur much more frequently in such settings due to limited time and resources as well as the patient’s reduced physiological reserve. The gum elastic bougie (GEB) intubation tube is an inexpensive, simple, and readily transportable aid to intubation, but its effectiveness in emergency airway management has not been comprehensively evaluated in recent years. Here, we performed a literature review and have updated the available evidence on the utility of GEB in emergency airway management. After a systematic MEDLINE search, we identified 36 relevant reports that compared GEB with alternative airway management approaches in a variety of real-world and simulated settings. In most studies, GEB increased the first-pass ETI success rate and decreased the force applied on the tongue and incisors during laryngoscopy. GEB also increased the speed, safety, and reliability of emergency cricothyrotomy. Conflicting results were obtained in studies examining GEB use for ETI during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and other special circumstances such as selective lung ventilation, the presence of vomitus, and the use of personal protective equipment. These results suggest that GEB use could be expanded beyond difficult airways and rescue after failed ETI attempts, but further studies will be necessary to determine the utility of GEB under special conditions. Because fatal airway-related adverse events can in part be attributed to limited accessibility of proper airway management equipment, devices such as GEB may increase successful outcomes, especially under the overwhelmingly challenging conditions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":49522,"journal":{"name":"Signa Vitae","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency airway management with the gum elastic bougie outside of the operating room: a narrative review\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.22514/sv.2023.074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ongoing coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has increased the need for healthcare professionals to perform emergency endotracheal intubation (ETI) in patients with COVID-19-related respiratory failure outside of the operating room. Difficult airways and severe airway-related adverse events occur much more frequently in such settings due to limited time and resources as well as the patient’s reduced physiological reserve. The gum elastic bougie (GEB) intubation tube is an inexpensive, simple, and readily transportable aid to intubation, but its effectiveness in emergency airway management has not been comprehensively evaluated in recent years. Here, we performed a literature review and have updated the available evidence on the utility of GEB in emergency airway management. After a systematic MEDLINE search, we identified 36 relevant reports that compared GEB with alternative airway management approaches in a variety of real-world and simulated settings. In most studies, GEB increased the first-pass ETI success rate and decreased the force applied on the tongue and incisors during laryngoscopy. GEB also increased the speed, safety, and reliability of emergency cricothyrotomy. Conflicting results were obtained in studies examining GEB use for ETI during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and other special circumstances such as selective lung ventilation, the presence of vomitus, and the use of personal protective equipment. These results suggest that GEB use could be expanded beyond difficult airways and rescue after failed ETI attempts, but further studies will be necessary to determine the utility of GEB under special conditions. Because fatal airway-related adverse events can in part be attributed to limited accessibility of proper airway management equipment, devices such as GEB may increase successful outcomes, especially under the overwhelmingly challenging conditions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Signa Vitae\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Signa Vitae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22514/sv.2023.074\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signa Vitae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22514/sv.2023.074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

持续的2019冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行增加了医疗保健专业人员在手术室外对COVID-19相关呼吸衰竭患者进行紧急气管内插管(ETI)的需求。由于时间和资源有限以及患者生理储备减少,气道困难和严重气道相关不良事件在这种情况下发生的频率要高得多。GEB插管是一种廉价、简单、易于运输的插管辅助工具,但近年来其在急诊气道管理中的有效性尚未得到全面评价。在这里,我们进行了文献综述,并更新了GEB在急诊气道管理中的应用的现有证据。经过系统的MEDLINE搜索,我们确定了36份相关报告,将GEB与各种现实世界和模拟环境中的替代气道管理方法进行了比较。在大多数研究中,GEB增加了第一次通过ETI的成功率,并减少了喉镜检查时舌头和门牙的受力。GEB还提高了紧急环甲环切开术的速度、安全性和可靠性。在心肺复苏期间使用GEB进行ETI以及其他特殊情况(如选择性肺通气、呕吐物的存在和使用个人防护装备)的研究中,得到了相互矛盾的结果。这些结果表明,GEB的使用可以扩展到困难气道和失败的ETI尝试后的抢救,但需要进一步的研究来确定GEB在特殊条件下的效用。由于致命的气道相关不良事件在一定程度上可归因于适当气道管理设备的可及性有限,因此GEB等设备可能会增加成功的结果,特别是在COVID-19大流行带来的极具挑战性的条件下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emergency airway management with the gum elastic bougie outside of the operating room: a narrative review
The ongoing coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has increased the need for healthcare professionals to perform emergency endotracheal intubation (ETI) in patients with COVID-19-related respiratory failure outside of the operating room. Difficult airways and severe airway-related adverse events occur much more frequently in such settings due to limited time and resources as well as the patient’s reduced physiological reserve. The gum elastic bougie (GEB) intubation tube is an inexpensive, simple, and readily transportable aid to intubation, but its effectiveness in emergency airway management has not been comprehensively evaluated in recent years. Here, we performed a literature review and have updated the available evidence on the utility of GEB in emergency airway management. After a systematic MEDLINE search, we identified 36 relevant reports that compared GEB with alternative airway management approaches in a variety of real-world and simulated settings. In most studies, GEB increased the first-pass ETI success rate and decreased the force applied on the tongue and incisors during laryngoscopy. GEB also increased the speed, safety, and reliability of emergency cricothyrotomy. Conflicting results were obtained in studies examining GEB use for ETI during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and other special circumstances such as selective lung ventilation, the presence of vomitus, and the use of personal protective equipment. These results suggest that GEB use could be expanded beyond difficult airways and rescue after failed ETI attempts, but further studies will be necessary to determine the utility of GEB under special conditions. Because fatal airway-related adverse events can in part be attributed to limited accessibility of proper airway management equipment, devices such as GEB may increase successful outcomes, especially under the overwhelmingly challenging conditions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Signa Vitae
Signa Vitae 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Signa Vitae is a completely open-access,peer-reviewed journal dedicate to deliver the leading edge research in anaesthesia, intensive care and emergency medicine to publics. The journal’s intention is to be practice-oriented, so we focus on the clinical practice and fundamental understanding of adult, pediatric and neonatal intensive care, as well as anesthesia and emergency medicine. Although Signa Vitae is primarily a clinical journal, we welcome submissions of basic science papers if the authors can demonstrate their clinical relevance. The Signa Vitae journal encourages scientists and academicians all around the world to share their original writings in the form of original research, review, mini-review, systematic review, short communication, case report, letter to the editor, commentary, rapid report, news and views, as well as meeting report. Full texts of all published articles, can be downloaded for free from our web site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信